Zis is a light vehicle and medium tank SOFT COUNTER but the Pak is a Light Vehicle and Medium Tank HARD COUNTER. Arent we trying to normalize and make everything Micro dependant? Where is the great Micro on the Pak required to make it Perform better than the Zis? o.O
Edit: I put Pak required to perform better than the Pak I meant better than the Zis
A question easily answered. The micro intensive play of the PaK lies within the fact that if you leave it in the same place for longer than 5sec youll get precision strike-fucked, by either mortars or arty. Maybe the heavens rain fire or a wild KV8 might appear from behind the bushed. Then again, it could also die to soviet snipers, a barking combat engineer or just drop dead cause it realizes just how shit it is when it comes to anything but DPS.
In all seriousness though. The PaK cant keep infantry at a distance with arty, cant kill suppressed squads with arty, cant survive a single mortar shot if it lands right on top. You get flanked by just one conscript squad that focuses fire, even with grens around, and your PaK dies. It also goes down to soviet tanks too easily. T70, when not fausted or completely retarded due to pathing, easily avoids and outruns a PaK. T34 AOE is enough to decrew it, bigger tanks like KV8 and IS2 completely rape it without breaking a sweat.
Yes, the Zis underperforms against heavier armour like Tigers and vet2 Panthers. No questioning that. But the PaK40 underperforms just as much vs anything that isnt a badly managed t70 or an SU85. Most other vehicles can easily outrun/avoid/kill it. You make it look like the PaK40 is some sort of wunderwaffe while the Zis is shit. Thats just not true man. Its relatively fast rof is a gods gift, but that is also due to the fact that the PaK sucks at survivability and may just aswell die to rain drops...