Again, I understand that you are upset. You see the Mark 2.0 version as a copy paste of your work and you feel entitled to have credit. That you have. The work you did can still be seen. We have made no claims to take that from you.
It is obvious to me that upon comparing the original to this "2.0" version CookiesNCream should have his credits re-added an author, perhaps jointly with the person who has added new text and made edits, but certainly not omitted.