Profile of Rosbone

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 2145 | Subs: 2

General Information
Register Time: 26 Aug 2017, 18:38 PM
Last Visit Time: Yesterday, 03:17 AM
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/Rosbone_Mako
Steam: 76561198351782810
Residence:

United States
Timezone: America/New_York

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Balance 2018 2vs210 Apr 2018, 10:58 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Apr 2018, 10:35 AMSweetrollNearTheDoor While not necessarily a balance issue I find the new squad formations and garrison mechanics pretty frustrating from time to time with every faction and is probably the number one thing that tilts me ingame. NUMBER 5 Your close quarters units refusing to fight close quarters because there is some yellow cover nearby so they snap to it like magnets while you are trying to close ground on the enemy. It is very annoying to rush Sturms into a squad just to have them turn around and move back 5 meters cause a stick is on the ground. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Balance 2018 2vs29 Apr 2018, 16:59 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Apr 2018, 15:53 PMSully My thoughts on 2v2 balance since the latest patch: USF Jackson is over-performing, especially coupled with popcap manipulation allowing them to be spammed. Indirect fire options are very strong compared to OKW, Ost can keep up for the most part. Infantry is in a good spot. Brits Double bren Tommies are overperforming, they should be limited to one LMG. Indirect fire options are lacking now that the mortar pit has been nerfed into the ground. Lack of vehicle snare can be really painful. Firefly feels very balanced compared to the Jackson. Soviets All openers (Cons/T1/T2) are very strong. Sniper being OP on most maps. Katyusha is way too effective at long range. It can safely get wipes and vets up very quickly. SU76 is over-performing. Its range/pen need to go down, and the barrage needs to cost munitions. SU85 is a monster with vet, possibly over-performing. PPSH cons are too cost-effective, leaving Shocks with no place in the game. Guards are back to being the jack of all trades elite inf. The buff to PTRS damage vs infantry was completely unnecessary. Ost Mortar is over-performing, especially vs Brits early game. Grens are incredibly fragile mid/late game; I'd love to see a 5th man either via vet like REs or via upgrade like Brits. 222 is a joke unit that really needs some love vs snipers especially. Panther is in an awkward spot. Is it a TD, or is it a brawler? Pick one and give it the same treatment that its allied counterparts get. OKW Good aggressive early game. Vet system needs an overhaul, right now it's inconsistent and often detrimental. Make vet levels 1-3 equal in strength and attainability to other factions and levels 4 & 5 unlock abilities across the board. Popcap numbers need to be brought down on a lot of units now that they're not nearly as strong; vehicles mostly. Struggles vs both maxim and sniper openers from Soviets. Same Panther issues as Ost. This post was too well written, not overtly biased, and efficiently presented. It also failed to mock noobs or incite hatred. Please leave In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Need help7 Apr 2018, 16:25 PM SH1 You may want to post your video settings as well. This game is brutal on PCs. Any laptop may struggle to play it as it needs a decent CPU to calc unit vision and movement. And a decent videocard to draw the multi-layered graphics. The slowest Videocard I have is a GTX 760 which plays decently at LOW settings. And your GT525M is about 1/10th as fast as a GTX 760. Sometimes laptop GPUs share main memory with the CPU and therefore do not perform anywhere near what they should. easiest thing to do is set everything to LOW and start from there. Maybe turn off Physics as well. You can start here until Cyanara responds to your post: COH2 PERFORMANCE GUIDE In: New Members
Thread: An Apology to the Community7 Apr 2018, 16:06 PM Quick Lock the thread! Kappa In: Lobby
Thread: COH2 STREAMER ETIQUETTE5 Apr 2018, 01:27 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Apr 2018, 06:37 AMTheMachine Yeah... oversimplified polls like these aren't constructive. Yeah... oversimplified statements like these aren't constructive. In: Lobby
Thread: An open letter to the CoHmmunity about rebroadcasting4 Apr 2018, 17:07 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Apr 2018, 17:01 PMHooligan How about just stop letting this helpinghans guy play in tounaments you organize if he is just undermining them? Or do you need him more than he needs you? Another reason I made the poll. So that it does not become a popularity contest. So it is not decided behind closed doors by a select few (most of which are against Hans in this thread). Because the obvious answer is have a ruling body as part of COH2.Org that makes the tournament, rules, allowable times, who is banned from play, etc. So each tourney could have a seal of approval that it is legit. Thus removing any grey areas. But it may divide the community further because most of the people making the rulings would be people against Hans, etc. So I nominate Sturmpanther as Lord and Dictator of all COH2. Heil Sturmpanther! In: Lobby
Thread: An open letter to the CoHmmunity about rebroadcasting4 Apr 2018, 14:53 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Apr 2018, 13:56 PMd0ggY And we should just talk about this in a Discord / Teamspeak. Make agreements, don't fight about what happened, because now we cannot turn back time and change the events. Come on COH2 Community, Coh2 Twitch community, let's all help each other out, pull on the same Strings, and we are going to be more than we could imagine. This was the point of the poll. So when this meeting happens, you know where the community stands. In: Lobby
Thread: An open letter to the CoHmmunity about rebroadcasting4 Apr 2018, 14:27 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Apr 2018, 13:05 PMStormless This is a good discussion to have. I wouldn't say that nothing good is going to come out of this because we as organisers are speaking out about how we feel about this. The most important thing is that instead of this 'unspoken code of conduct' we have opened a debate so everyone can have their say about it. Following all the points here. Rules will be updated, guidelines will be established and sanctions created to ensure that situations like this are clear cut when someone breaks the rules. This is exactly what I hoped would come of this discussion and poll I created (against my will). TOs could get a feel for what the community wants and create some rules posted on this site somewhere in the streaming area. To go even further there could be an official COH2.ORG seal that could bee added to your broadcast to help create a place where viewers/streamers could get to this information easily. In: Lobby
Thread: COH2 STREAMER ETIQUETTE4 Apr 2018, 05:08 AM For MMA fans, Joe Rogan routinely does a podcast during a UFC event. He is just chatting with friends as THEY watch. None of the broadcast is shown or heard in the podcast. So it is a casual party atmosphere. This seems like a possible option for COH2 streamers. This would allow for viewers to hang out, to hear the streamers thoughts, AND would encourage them to watch the original tournament stream. I also like this approach because my Inet sucks. And sometimes I can not watch multiple streams. So I could have audio/chat only from the streamer and full broadcast of the tourney. More available options for everyone. In: Lobby
Thread: COH2 STREAMER ETIQUETTE3 Apr 2018, 23:34 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2018, 23:31 PMA_E Rosbone this poll misses the mark horribly, I don't think you've fully read the thread have you? This is not about the Stormless thread. But the thread touched on streaming during others broadcasts. And I thought some of that would get hashed out in the Stormless thread, but it got locked before any good could come of it. EDIT: And Hans has an even greyer twist in that he is a variety streamer. So many of his viewers may never watch the tournament anyway. They tune in for Hans only. In: Lobby