Profile of Jae For Jett

Just from some quick browsing:

The deflection damage for AT sections BOYS rifles gives too many digits of precision.

The comet vet 3 reload bonus is not reflected in the stats (unless there was a mistake in implementation and the bonus was never actually added...).

The luchs 2cm cannon does not list its target table (an accuracy multiplier against vehicles).

Some OKW units (mostly the vehicles) only have stats for up to vet 3, even when they receive relevant combat buffs at vet levels 4 and 5. For these units, tables for vet 5 would be very useful to have, if possible.

The ostheer 222 doesn't have the 2cm autocannon listed under its weapons, only a (presumably 221) pintle mg34. Odd since the pintles are clearly mg42s to begin with...

Partisan tank hunters are missing their panzerschreck. They only list their KARs currently.

Shock troop ppshs (found on shocks and airborne guards) are listed, but lack an actual name in their entry.

Trying to select the KV8 seemingly redirects to the KV2.

Assault guards do not have thompsons listed under their weapons, only svts.

Trying to select cavalry riflemen or penal battallions causes the website to hard lock/freeze.

Regular pathfinders aren't pulling the correct sniper weapon, and I&R pathfinders are missing it entirely.

Vehicle crews are missing the (doctrinally possible) thompsons and only have grease guns listed.

The WC51 lists only its gun stats at vet 1. It gets combat bonuses at vet 3, so listing the gun stats at vet 3 would be useful.

There are also a lot of dummy/unused/cut weapons, though I'm sure most people are aware of that fact since it was true of the last unit stats site too.

This also applies to indirect fire such as mortars.

Its not just mortars as well, its also tank shells. Its all explosives, and in fact, its all weapons.

As far as I'm aware, cover works by one simple rule: which direction was the projectile originally fired from. When you realize this, it becomes a little bit more intuitive imo.

ninja fixing

It wasnt even ninja fixed. It was documented in the patch notes under bug fixes but people just passed over it for some reason.

So what advice do u have for us if u claim we've been attack grounding wrong?

It was already included in the post. He said that you want to be attack-grounding at max range behind the target.

That said, I was under the impression that around half of the top level players knew to attack ground behind the target. Given air shots and the possible vertical component that was mentioned in this thread, I assume targeting max range many not always be ideal though, especially for vehicles with a smaller hitbox.

Considering the conversations ive had with noggano and kimbo (The latter who thinks you basically lose the game if you dont kill the AEC valentine combo before 13 min you lose, and the former who when asked about what to do vs brits was "So far i think only 5 man are a good answer") i can with certainty say they used brits a significant part for a good reason.

Then say that instead of pointing out that a more or less expected number of players in the top 4 used UKF. My issue isn't that you don't have a point. My issue is that half of the points you bring up are misguided.