Make strumtiger fire a nuke instead of scary fireworks. 
I mean if we're actually going to attempt at that problem you just need some kind of AI on an armor piece that isn't the P4. Either making the KT good again or adding the ostwind. Right now if your opponet has TDs and rocket arty your 4 man obers and tanks just get rolled. Only to be saved by cloak rak cheese. |
I understand the concept of this changes. Idea is good, won't be used often, but can do their job. Even if it kills 1 t34 and then packed up it will still be worth it BUT Thing is that pak43 in that specific form can't be used effectively becouse build time and packing up takes too much time, way too much time. Where is the shock value if building time takes 2 years to finish?
Personally i;m a bigger fan of making this specific pak43 in defensive doctrine as a emplacement.
Personally I don't like it nor understand it. I mean I don't want 88mm creep like bunker spam is currently, and ideally I wouldn't want a 17pdr clone but I'd take the clone over 88 creep any day. What it is now is just a half baked idea imo. |
You just solved all USF early game problems.
If only I could solve OKWs lategame problems too  |
|
Get pershing -> delete shit. 60% of the time it works everytime |
|
Pak 43 is supposed to be shock value and then scuttle? At the very most you'll get a single medium kill from it and at the very least you'll get 1 shot off. Not worth the resources even remotely to inflict 1 320 damage shot. |
On any other map, lightning war (the one with JU87 AT loiter, panzer tactician and command p4) is never a wrong choice.
Blitzkrieg is what you're describing. Lightning war is G43s, JU87 and Tiger 1.
@OP Your goal as wehrmacht is to tech T4, get a brummbar, and obliterate the capitalist pigs. |
So it's nothing strange when after failed surrender you continue to play, then one enemy drops and you get a defeat right at that moment [maybe because surrendering gets unbugged somehow and finishes successfully with only one vote]? 
What do you call 'the end'? The end wasn't when we or they dropped to 0 vp, the end came when enemy dropped and it scored us defeat right then.
I mean anythings possible with the code in this game. It's possible it was a drophack by that one player, although you would've gotten a defeat before they dropped, or while, not after. Yes the surrender bug could've become "unstuck" although I personally have never seen that bug be fixed. |
|
What is strange about this?
According to your list, you tried to surrender and failed because it was bugged, but you lose in the end anyways?
The surrender bug often occurs when a team spams surrender and its declined, and then too quickly a new surrender is attempted.
|
No, Currahee tried to partner us previous 2v2 tourney and now I asked him if he wanted to partner and we played a couple matches, but we forgot to sign up because we didnt read the tourney post dates. Now he got permabanned for something
You told me you weren't gonna play. Now u say u were gonna play with Andres? Why don't you like me  |
You mean you don't pay muni to nerf your squad? How else will we let the enemy win?
Idunnoman I guess we're supposed to balance out the great AI DPS by always purchasing PTRS. Any who don't are aboosing n00bs and should be banned from tournies. |
United States
Siddolio
Talisman
Talisman
EXPERTSVonIvan
Theodosios
Relic Entertainment
