How do you make a custom signature?
This isn't the place for this question, but you're new here and may/may not fully understand all our rules yet. Microsoft paint is what I use. You can crop, edit, resize just about anything you like. |
Just a garbage grenade that's been overlooked. It didn't need to be buffed previously before the fusi nerfs because fusi's were off the wall bonkers infantry. |
The KV-8 IIRC received similar treatment last patch no? |
I buld it reactionary to a luchs, which is reactionary occasioinally to your m20. If you can place your bets on an M20 mine to kill the luchs, I'd avoid the stuart. But if you cannot and want a more secure unit to deal with the luchs, go stuart.
Unfortunatly it probably won't kill the luchs or puma by itself due to low damage per shot, so it may require a zook volley inorder to secure kills.
Understanding engagements with pumas is rather crucial. The puma has both 50 sight and range and typically has the advantage over the stuart because of this + smoke canister. However the stuart can take a win with correct support and a stun shot. |
Map is "crossing in the woods" IIRC |
I think Pgrens are literally the most balanced unit ingame. Although balanced doesn't mean perfect, they're damn close. What I love about them is that, as opposed to grenadiers, their veterancy bonuses are swapped. Where grens get acc and RA at vet 2/3 respectivley, pgrens get their RA first to allow for closing in without dropping valuable DPS.
I think a lot of the reason players don't get them is due to the G43 access on grenadiers. G43s allow for highly mobile grenadiers but also bolster their CQC DPS substantially. They won't be beating rangers, but they can very much hold their own against closing squads. I think this causes no real reason to select pgrens over just getting another cheaper grenadier and tossing 45 munis into the upgrade. I think the G43 upgrade needs to be looked at as well, as I beleive it does too much for too little cost.
Pgren G43s are just redundant, unless it's overhauled like you suggested. |
Unless it's the latest latest changes, it "should" be up to date. Mortars did in fact changed but that has been quite some time ago.
Problem with mod tools is accessibility and readability. For specific things i also jump straight to the files (i always had the extractor tool).
Yeah it just doesn't include Dec 2018 patches (JLI, brummbar nerfs, etc). |
Also, it's better to check here before spouting X unit is ACTUALLY the worst/best.
https://coh2db.com/stats/
I tend to ignore all stat sources that isn't the mod tools. I've never seen any source 100% up to date that isn't the mod tools, that site included. |
Again? Opening the thread was ok, the derailment isn't.
Unfortunately allowing the opening of another thread here was a mistake, and shouldn't be done again, at least for this topic.
/locked |
Which is why OKW should have gotten an AT-themed doctrine instead of "Grand Offensive". But whatever, a shiny Tiger Tank is probably just more attractive for the average COH2 player.
I mean you can't deny that the way these new commanders have gone through reworks, said shiny tank is probably gonna be omegastrong, or at least better than KT LUL |