Profile of Cresc

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 378

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/crescent_bretzel
Steam: 76561198162641695


Thread: Panzer Tactician too strong, prove me wrong.25 Sep 2018, 23:55 PM Nobody is saying that Panzer Tactician should get a nerf, just some balancing in order to force players to put micro in place when using this ability, just like any other doctrinal ability in the game. You don't just press a button with near no ammo spent to magically disappear in an engagement, it's just like back when people said that target weak point was fine, press one button freeze tanks... It didn't take them that much time to nerf button on guards right? I mean seriously. Jump back to quoted post25 Sep 2018, 22:56 PMdistrofio since this post complaints about some synergy of axis tanks, also pointing out that the smoke is doctrinal... then in order to "balance" things out then also remove the self spotting ability of SU85 or make it doctrinal. Im saying that many changes should be made, because 2 abilitys of axis are considered ""Overpowered"" doesnt make its winrate skyrise neither. OP isnt posting a fair point I must address... How is this balanced in anyway? Make the only reason to build a SU85 doctrinal? Care to post your playercard? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panzer Tactician too strong, prove me wrong.24 Sep 2018, 18:48 PM I love it when you spend these 40ap in a useless ability like button and it just cancels when the smoke is pulled out. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panzer Tactician too strong, prove me wrong.24 Sep 2018, 18:16 PM THe solution is already there in every faction. Either increase the cost or put a delay on it, I don't see whats so hard about this, so that players who chose to use panzer tactician have to commit to that choice, not simply pull a middle finger on somebody who had to play carefully in an engagement to win. If you want to escape? You commit to that choice, you don't wait for the last second to save yourself. We all had that situation where panzer tactician didn't only save a panzer but even let the axis player win the engagement at the last moment. Can you imagine having to manage and prepare for a battle and lose it because of a gimmick all that effort going to waste because that one commander lets you press a button to pull out a smoke screen instantly? Some other morons also tell you that you should use ground attack...Thanks genius. The thing is that the problem relies on reaction and micromanagement, anything can happen in that short period of time where a smoke is used to cover your tank. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panzer Tactician too strong, prove me wrong.24 Sep 2018, 17:41 PM I wish I could insert some nice words here for you tobis. You should know what else is fine if panzer tactician is. Also the winrates are really ambiguous, leaves absolutely no room to show a clear unbalance between faction. USF is blatantly shit in 1v1. Like I said, there always going to be morons(not you eh) showing off stats when it's completely irrelevant to the current topic. Panzer Tactician would only be fine if it required actual micromanaging either in reaction time or ammunitions. It doesn't penalize you for either, it's a card you can pull out at anytime whenever you should be losing a tank for any reason this is. it's hard enough to kill german tanks in this game on top of that you give them an ability to escape an engagement they are losing with 0 consequence or effort put in, this is not balanced. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panzer Tactician too strong, prove me wrong.24 Sep 2018, 15:03 PM Don't sweat it, I've been complainig about this ability for years, the community don't want to admit that panzer tactician is braindead and offers an unfair advantage. As always you also have that one moron (or two, or three...) who will share stats about how allies dominate the game... At least making it using actual micro would be a good change, right now is just press a button and gone. You would think that using it would bleed the ammunition, it's doesn't. I understand this ability on fragile units though. Playing against idiots who can simply pull off and save their tanks when you win the encounter is way too frustrating, it doesn't pay off for good players. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Flame Halftrack20 Sep 2018, 17:35 PM flame HT is just the old T70, I don't see how this is ok, but since it's an axis unit nobody cries op. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How to play soviet in 1v1 (MUST WATCH)20 Sep 2018, 17:23 PM This replay shows you all about how you can save yourself using the weakest faction in the game. In: Replays
Thread: Flame Halftrack17 Sep 2018, 14:10 PM Light vehicles are a problem no matter what faction we're talking about. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch15 Sep 2018, 11:26 AM Also please don't forget to change the Tiger Ace painting, I'm pointing out a serious flaw here. In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch15 Sep 2018, 11:17 AM I think the problem with Soviet Industry is that they removed the ability to produce tanks in a second, which was the whole point of picking the commander (besides the twice nerfed fuel boost that is now replaced with supply drops). The commander should have a perk that increase the build time of tanks like it used to. The KV2 isn't bad, but there is simply no real use for it, if you reached late game with soviet industry, chances are you already have an army that can sustain itself without the need of an expensive tank like the KV2. I mean when I pick this commander I never go with the thought that I'm going to build it in late game or include it in my build. In: Lobby