Profile of Cresc

you know that even wiht g43s grens are designed to have support weapons to help them? Gren spam with g43 does not compensate their shortcomings

It's true, as any other infantry.
Still the g43 doesn't do enough damage.
or else we can just admit that once you upgrade to g43, you are turning your gren into a support unit.

I think you guys might possibly be afflicted mentally.
I was rank 120 with ostheer, I got bored so I decided to incorporate grens+g43 strats and now I'm losing endlessly.

"hurrr maybe its cuz u need to L2P?"
Whatever you think, try to consider this.

My thoughts so far on them:

-Grenadiers are trash
-MG42 is too fragile (and lose one = lose game)
-Panzer 4 is mildly effective
-Most of these new dogshit maps they shove up our butt offer the worst play for AT gun placement, yet, it's the only choice you have against heavy tanks because: STUGS ARE UTTERLY BAD
-You will get butt fucked by zis guns barrage faster than you can hit that retreat/backtrack button.

As Ostheer, getting a Tiger takes so much time, go figure why, then you wonder why OKW was the first pick in GCS.
Ask yourself, why whenever you watch footage of top players, they are now using osttruppens(best way to try an early baselock) or ass grens?

Let me ask you this: Why would you trade a g43 over a lmg? I don't get it.
Do you never see that in green cover the lmg will win the engagement even when your unit is the one closing in?

Oh! great! g43 can fire on the move, so what? It's going to counter shocks? You're going to fight on par against cons and riflemen in close combat?
None of this will happen, cut out the bullshit.

If gren g43s were good you would see them more often.

Except for the 6,000 games that were played on them recently. We will ignore those people

But I have to thank you for getting people talking about the maps. There has not been much chatter about them.

Yes, why not ignore the minority?

These people couldn't care less, people don't chose what map they play on, that's what it's all about.
But you can just go and ask GCS contenders their opinion on bayeux for instance, I'm sure you will find nothing but favorable feedback on this map that everybody has put a veto on...

Karkov is the most played map 2v2, there was a time in 1v1 where they wouldn't remove it for a long time, for the same reason, using these stats claiming that it's still vastly played.

These two maps are below anything I've seen since Caen and need to be removed.
I haven't seen somebody on stream not putting a veto to Bayeux so far, I'm pretty sure this is by far the worst map in the pool.