Most expensive stock mainline infantry "are not expensive".
You literally are arguing numerical facts.
That is a level of denial scientists believed can't exist.
How many years are we repeating to you drones that it is not how reinforcement costs work?
Its balanced on SQUAD basis.
And reinforcing penals from 1 man to full is adequately expensive to their price, just like all other allied infantry, because for "reasons" all the axis infantry except volks and grens needs to have a discount on reinforcement.
Have you ever seen volksgrenadiers?
Or Panzerfussiliers?
If losing a bunker is such an issue for you, stop spamming them, they need to be counterable by T1 soviets as well.
And can you stop pretending that penals do not have an actual grenade?
Satchel is useless in infantry combat, unless you go AFK when fight starts.
Except, there never are 2-3, its always 4-5 due to how cheap, strong and excellently scaling they are.
You are comparing an investment of 500-750 mp to investment of well over 1500 mp.
Maybe you should use that additional 750mp you just floated and get more units on field yourself?
You know, like Luchs or AAHT, which can be countered pretty much only by T-70 if you do not have 80 year old grandpa micro.
Do you see how retardedly stupid your point is?
Stop doing meth.
You didnt look the last 2 torunements, right? Or maybe u look them..but didnt realize how versatile and NOT USELESS stachels was. They wiped a lot.
OR do u wanna tell us that the tournements-player are brain afk player? When will we see your next game? This yeahr? When will we see that you show us your skill, when battling me?
You are a forum troll which dont play this game active. Not more. You should prove your skill. Say when u ready. |
|
Penals arent expansive like some members here want to tell us.Yes, they have a higher pricetag. But their reinforce cost per model is totally cheap. 2-3 penals are so much cancer ...not one other infntery squad can run around the battlefield and make so much pressure. hey there is forwards building...or a cache. lets satchel it with cheap 45muni. or lets flank a bunker: dead. or lets kill teamweapons and recrew it..and have 3 men left.
2-3 volks? no problem!
combine them with sniper and/ or a at gun..and ur enemy has so much trouble to deal with this. because the AT gun can not only fight armor..no it kills much better teamweopans and enemy squads than some other dedicated indirect fire units. |
|
All brits defense their emplacement to have a brace ability with the fact: it cant move. So it must survive a attack.
what is with other emplacements from other faction? like pak43 ? can it move? have it 900 hp like a 17pdr? no..it has the half of it!
and cant brace...and cant shoot flares, and dont aim they 360 alone, and need a doc and 8cp! |
Doctrinal, optional gimmick vs a stock unit that needs to be reliable, is expensive and costs a hefty amount of fuel and pop cap.
Yeah, you go boy, compare them apples to oranges.
Don't like it, just go for ele/jt.
Are u drunk?
- the pak43 and the 17pdr cost THE SAME (when i remeber right: even the popcap goes down on the 17pdr to the near same lvl from pak43.)!
- pak43 comes late at 8cp. 17pdr is ready after building the sec buidling.
|
|
its funny that brits gets a nondoc 17pdr which can:
- brace
- selfaiming 360
- flares
- and even the shot through shootblocker abilty (for a time...but thats whats u need when tank rushes (no all the time))
while axis get it pak43 only through docs, no brace, no flares, no self aiming...only stun and shot through shotblocker...once it shot one time...a good player will delete it easily.
|
|
10sec behind...awefull unit. a centaur push infntery effectily away. a ostwind take ages to do the same. u even push back the ostwind with handheld AT infantery easily. while the centaur will kill your squdad when u try to faust it. |
|
Didnt u said that more axis chances will come in later patches? When? |
You do realize it was within context of same archetype units?
Last time I have checked, ostwind was much better then M5 quad in dealing damage and especially taking damage.
And another time I have checked, Bofors was better version of OKW buildable flak, which happens to be also cheaper.
So, quit your mental gymnastics before you pull these last 2 grey cells.
Now that we're done here, got any more of them silly noob statements with arguments pullet straight out of your rear escape hatch?
Once more: do u wanna tell us ostwind is super ok like it is now??
U are most boy here which never played this game in actually version months ago. Show us a game wghere whe seee: yesss...the ostwind is really good and we all only to dumb to play it.
|
Sure, the moment it locks P4 from being built and makes it immobile.
Why? thats the price for the tripple fuel needed. We learned from u in the past: expansiver units should be much better. Ostmust not better tahn bofors..only havent it penalty from locking units. It hasent the huge amount of defence abilty from bofors..(indirect fire, brace, high HP) ..only its offense. sound legit.
we learned form u in the past: bofors isnt dangerous. So it should be fully ok on ostwind.
if u cry more..mabye it shoudl get a cost increase...than it should be ok to have the same performanche, ok? |
|
give it the performanche from a bofors...since it cost tripple the fuel cost from it. |
Relic Entertainment
