Profile of ullumulu

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2243

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/ullumulu


Thread: Revamping the revamped Firestorm doctrine 1 Mar 2019, 12:31 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Mar 2019, 11:34 AMKatitof Yes, AT satchels on allied side is ok. If one side has weaker infantry AT, it gets better supplemental abilities. That's how balance works. are you seriuos? This days mostly every allie blobb run around with pitas/ PTRS/ zooks...mostly 4-6 on the count. this blobbs are more cancer than axis blobbs where you have 2 schrecks on pgrens(very expansive) with AT weapons which misses so much on far and mid range...its not funny.. 2 zooks/ piats > 2 schrecks (except close combat/ not moving tanks) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer MG/Early1 Mar 2019, 11:10 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Mar 2019, 11:07 AMelnur009 Ostheer is completely broken in 1v1 few days ago i grabbed double bars on all riflemen and tried to take down the mg from front, guess what, it suppressed all my infantry, and then i lost map control. shouldn't i won that game easily by taking op weapons and rush? First game in coh2? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Revamping the revamped Firestorm doctrine 1 Mar 2019, 11:02 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Mar 2019, 10:56 AMKatitof So... satchel does exactly what it was meant to do and its op now? Pull your head out of your rear please. You are the guy which bring the the "op" in this discussion, not me. I only said that is funny that AT satchels ok on allie side..but you need only thinking about to give them on stpios ...allie fanbois come a sec later cry it is not needed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Revamping the revamped Firestorm doctrine 1 Mar 2019, 10:34 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Mar 2019, 10:24 AMSeductiveCardbordBox No, they're not. They are a one in a few hundred chance of wiping a squad for a normal satchel, and the AT stachel is just a worse AT grenade in the majority of cases it gets thrown. If it gets thrown at all. dude. noone (not many) use satchel to wipe units. its the 45muni atombomb to kill every bunker or building. And if you would ook the last tournements...AT satchels was very succesfully..much more in teamgames. Go on and look In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Revamping the revamped Firestorm doctrine 1 Mar 2019, 10:02 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Mar 2019, 09:33 AMKatitof If you want to have shrecks removed and AT rifle instead, you can have sticky satchel. If you meant regular one, what abuse? You'd have to be deaf, blind and have about 2 APM to not avoid it 100% of the time. You might want to learn the difference between "abuse" of something and you being horribly bad. oh boi---you try it evertime, right? But i can repeat me evertime..maybe you will undertand it ...in some years: once more...ONLY for YOU: > satchels are very effective..even in high rank games vs the best players > AT Satchels are much more effective ...even in high ranks vs the best players In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer MG/Early1 Mar 2019, 09:17 AM i dont know why do you think maxim is weak..it is great at the sov faction and can on most maps counter every okw easily. and have acces to an AT gun with barrage abilty, good mortars to cunter other mgs..and callin guards..is the greatest and easiest strat to win the early and midgame In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Revamping the revamped Firestorm doctrine 1 Mar 2019, 07:05 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Feb 2019, 11:43 AMblancat AT rifle is weaker than panzershrek That is not buff, just make them worse also there is no need to AT satchel just lowering the price is enough (90->70) it's funny like every allie player satchels abuse and fear of it the axis player got something similar .... and AT rifles would be a buff..cause schrecks misses mostly everytime u try to hit somehting except in close combat....one shot and must mostly retreat vs most allie tank. the rifles can shot from far range and an AT satchel would be good vs dive ins...like other AT satchels from USF and sov In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Revamping the revamped Firestorm doctrine 28 Feb 2019, 11:34 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Feb 2019, 11:32 AMLago The problem here's the Panzershreck package imo. The Sweeper upgrade's offset by being stowable and giving a repair boost. The Panzershreck package is expensive and cripples your expensive Sturmpio. You need two to be effective, but two Panzershreck Sturmpios is a ridiculous investment and double Panzershrecks on a single Sturmpio would be 140 MU, meaning it isn't accessible early on when you actually need it. The AT upgrade just needs something more. Sticky satchels, maybe? Or swap the Panzerschreck for two Panzerbusche AT rifles (they're in the game) and give them Button at Vet 2? Great suggestions! +1 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Revamping the revamped Firestorm doctrine 28 Feb 2019, 10:58 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Feb 2019, 10:51 AMSeductiveCardbordBox Sturmpios also get to put away their minesweeper and come with four brand new STG44's right out of the box. They do not need a firepower upgrade to accompany their Sweepers. They can freely stow it for another assault rifle. someone forget the high price...you can get a penal with miniatombombs, 6 model squads for the same price...while pio at other faction cost mostly under 200mp In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Revamping the revamped Firestorm doctrine 28 Feb 2019, 10:18 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Feb 2019, 11:22 AMSeductiveCardbordBox If you cannot bear to lose minesweeprs for flamethrowers, again, that's on you. RE and Sappers face the same choice. hmm...but RE and sappers can carry their minesweeper AND 2 weapon upgrades from racks... stpio can carry only one out of the box...a schreck or a minesweeper...because you know OKW has no racks. it would be fair when it can upgrade both... In: COH2 Balance