Profile of CaPoNe7i8

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 8

General Information


Thread: Re-crewed MG-42 (maybe the 34) becomes broken unit7 Dec 2015, 22:05 PM I don't sorry, if I encounter it again I'll be sure to save it. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: CoH2 Content Wishlist6 Dec 2015, 01:06 AM 1. Greater received damage for units out of cover, with more dynamic cover added to maps, instantly makes for more strategy and less blobbing. 2. As others mentioned, tanks to ferry infantry, and also provide Green cover for any infantry around it! 3. Cumulative record of stats for damage dealt, kills, losses, points captured. Just like wins/losses per faction and game mode are tracked. This can't be that hard to implement and it would be fun! In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Re-crewed MG-42 (maybe the 34) becomes broken unit4 Dec 2015, 15:53 PM Hello. Just played a game as the Americans, I captured an MG with echelons, I forgot to check if it was 42 or 34. When I gave it instructions to face, it didn't show an arc, that tipped me off to something strange. And then I noticed it wouldn't even fire. Sorry for no replay, but this exists! In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: pro at micro, suck at macro, advice?21 Nov 2015, 17:54 PM Good points above like watching others, and your own replays, as well as rethinking your resource management, and unit composition. Also remember: - Only engage in fights you can win, unless the distraction is part of some larger strategy. Otherwise it is pointless to fight draws, or where you can lose easily. Fight when you have cover and they don't, fight when you are 2:1, otherwise withdraw or retreat. - Cap off cutoff points, use the extra time they take to try to destroy it to mobilize a force against them, thus preventing the cutoff. - All things being equal, the size of your army is the size of their army. Use this knowledge to help track where his units may be or where they may not be. For example: Early game, about 4-5 units on the field for each side. He spams 3 mgs, and has 2 inf units to your 4-5 riflemen. You engage his mgs on one side of the map and try to outmaneuver them. His inf are nowhere to be found. His inf have had plenty of time to heal and move across the map. He is NOT capping any of your points. What the hell is his inf doing then? Probably the flank on your open side. If he is capping your points, you can be sure he won't have enough to flank. If you just made them retreat from somewhere, you can be sure he won't have them available to flank. Look at yourself, and how you play, and you will then understand more or less how your opponent plays. Of course there will be difference especially due to skill, but this is the starting point for understanding what your opponent is doing. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Quitters Need to Be Shamed9 Nov 2015, 17:40 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Nov 2015, 17:33 PMvan Voort Also check 1.3 of the site rules: 1.3 Defamation of other users◦ Calling names or insulting other users by referring to them with a degrading/humiliating name is not allowed. ◦ This also includes being disrespectful to developers. ◦ Actions:◾ Any content directly or indirectly related to defamation of other users may be removed and in excessive cases the user may be banned for up to 7 days. Understood. It's not defamation if it's true. The dude quit. I didn't call him any names, neither did I insult him, in game or in this thread. He quit, that's a fact. In: Lobby
Thread: Quitters Need to Be Shamed9 Nov 2015, 17:38 PM I agree matchmaking, ideally, should pair us up with equally skilled teammates against equally skilled opponents. Not a surprise to anyone that life isn't ideal. So we just quit? You don't see a problem with this attitude? That's why people lose. They don't even try because "this is not fair, or this isn't working right." You are the one not working right. Your attitude is not right. Your behavior is not right. You showed up to the play the game, so play the game! It's not going to be ideal. (I say "you", not you personally, but the general audience) In: Lobby
Thread: Quitters Need to Be Shamed9 Nov 2015, 17:26 PM TL;DR - STOP GARDENING QUITTING! ARE THE ONLY GAMES YOU QUITTERS PLAY THE ONES WHERE YOU STEAMROLL? I seldom see this being addressed on these forums and I can't be the only one who has experienced this. It's really ridiculous and this is an issue that goes beyond the game. Some of us think it is okay to just quit when the going gets tough. I'm a fair weather player, I play at least one game a day, I've played since the original COH, and nowadays I usually get the highest scores and win more than I lose. Not to brag, but just to show you where I'm coming from. Because I only play only a game or so, I look forward to my matches. There is little more satisfying than fighting a slugfest with able opponents and winning! I'll accept the loss, if it means I've at least fought a competitive match. I'll accept getting steamrolled, if I just didn't play a good game against someone better than me or my teammates. I'll accept doing the steamrolling, because sometimes we're that much better than our matched opponents. What I cannot acccept under any circumstances, is folks quitting in the middle of a match because it's not going their way. Especially when we are losing the WHOLE GAME, they quit, and we end up turning it around. We turn it around not because they quit, but in spite of them quitting. We turn it around because we had the ability to turn it around all along. All we needed was patience, courage, and determination in waiting for the right opportunity. That opportunity doesn't come if you quit! I just played a game that we were losing the whole match, it was a slug fest. Our surrender button is hit, me and my other mate select "No". No words are said, except I remark that "whoever did it should not hit that gardening button again". They do it again, me and my other mate say "No" again. The other dude leaves the game immediately. Over the next 10 or 15 minutes, we end up bringing our opponents to also opt for surrender, twice. The difference is they hung in, and happened to win this match. I wonder if we didn't have an inferior CPU playing, maybe we would have completed the turn around and won. The upsetting part is, usually the quitters are the sucky teammates who don't play well and aren't team players. This dude happened to be pretty good and wasn't whining as quitters usually do. He just quit. I felt sorry for him and I don't even know him. I hope this is not taken as a rant because there is an objective here. There should be a pinned thread that politely shames quitters with replays, preferably of where you made a comeback DESPITE them quitting on you. I have a good dozen replays, most of which we successfully came back, but all of them displaying a disheartening display of human failure. I understand many of us are youngsters, or just immature in some aspects of our lives. That's fine, there is nothing wrong with any of that, that's life. That doesn't mean it's okay to be a quitter, ever. We need to take a stand against this disgusting attitude. Old, young, mature, immature, girl, boy, YOU DO NOT EVER QUIT! IT'S OVER WHEN IT'S OVER. I wasn't going to put it up but garden that, Zippo you played a great game dude, we had this comeback nailed but we were missing a key ingredient out of the three: YOU, a bunch of courage, and a little luck. We had it all except YOU, right when we needed you. I'm not mad at you, just disappointed. Full disclosure: I'm making the assumptions about this match, maybe he had a legit reason. But it's a buildup of the dozens of times weak-willed human beings just gave up when they really didn't need to. Success was just waiting for them if they just gave it a chance. I'll be the first to apologize if I'm mistaken, but everything I've said stands regardless of this particular match. 1 VS CaPoNe7i8 CaptainAmerica Zippo Bob Pontes ARC_012_Aden[ger] Screaming Stukas Almost won it by: CaPoNe7i8 map: Rzhev Winter** 1 - In: Lobby
Thread: Almost won it9 Nov 2015, 17:04 PM Sorry my teammate had to quit just as we turned it around. In: Replays