[OFF-TOPIC]
Just a wild thought: Aforementioned causes frustration, which leads to these outbursts on bad moments, which leads to warnings, which leads to bans.
Would it be sensible to use the same penalization on apparent use of illogicality for whatever reason; e.x: the case on hand.
Penalizing only the symptoms is easier, I give that, but I don't think it'd be terribly hard to penalize the root problem - too.
I disagree that logical inconsistencies and expressing disagreement are the roots of the issue. I understand human beings as creatures capable of making choices--even choices that defy every influence or "trigger" that they are subject to. Thus, I would say that it is the choice of forum users how they would like to respond to illogicality and frustration. I call for forum users to be emotionally mature, in the sense that you can express your own opinions while being considerate of the emotions of others. You could say that this is called "being the bigger person".
As of the writing of this post, the CoH2.org forum has no rules to punish illogicality, nor would I say that CoH2.org should. I would say that punishing illogicality is uncalled for, as it an intellectual fault. Intellectual faults are exposed; moral faults are punished.
If your scientific report ran afoul of the general rules of logic, you would not need to spend time in jail (as if you committed a robbery) for it; your academic peers would simply expose your faults and people would ignore your words (until you have corrected your faults).
AnAlternateWorld
Leorique
AtomicRockets
AtomicRockets
AnAlternateWorld
Relic Entertainment
