Then we would have double IS-2 in one commander (Armored Assault)
Still I think that, quicker veterancy would be much better and fine for this tank. And a bit cheaper in mp to buff it in industry and in normal games with commanders without callins tanks.
Replace SU-76 by a SU-100 unit x), give it to armored assault. lol
T34-76 is a shame ... i agree, T34-85 must be a no-doctrinal unit.
Delete Su-76, replace it with t34-76 in T3, then just put the t34-85 in T4. Problem solved. And no more free artillery barrage, no more call-in, everybody happy.
Only problem with this -> what we do about commanders with T34-85 ability ?
Say what you want about Quentin, but the dude has got the point.
All players that made it through to the final qualification round, went through several stages of hell. The qualification games become pointless after the third round because the competition is not about skill, tactics and strategy at that point but about pure physical attrition.
The skill differences between invited players and the top qualification players is not that different. Yet half of them never went through attrition battles. Who knows, maybe Jesulin or Aimstrong would have succumbed to fatigue like other top players did.
I applaud Cruzz who rejected the invite and qualified to the finals fair and square. I hope he wins OCF.
The invitational format of the tournament (which happens to be open for everyone) simply does not do justice to the amount of closely skilled talent we are trying to promote.
I think the problem is in Axis players. I mean they was not ready to face faction that have stock lategame units(comet/cherch) and can go defence. It's very different frome soviets (realay on commander heavaly,esp. in late game) and usf (early pushing and mobile force). It's need some time to understand who are they realy are.
. Put tellers everywhere. As a good russian player.
France
(Armored Assault)
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
