Profile of AsunaKirigaya

That isn't what is happening here.

Nobody is crying axis OP, but it is worth taking into consideration that demo charges are a fantastic (and cost effective) counter to some axis units. I have no problem with making changes, but I would much prefer to see demos stay capable of blob busting and unit baiting.



First of all, that isn't how english works. One player being good is not mutually exlusive to both players being competent. I think his point was just that the allied early game advantage is not universally applicable, as good micro can help to nullify the advantages cons/rifleman have over volks/grens.

In any case, it looks to me like this thread is drifitng off the topic of DEMO CHARGES.

yes. this is wath i meant. microing will nullify the advantage. and yes this thread is going off topic, thats why i wont post here anymore. to keep it on topic.

First off faust is only on falls for OKW. Ostheer have faust on Grens. Cons do win against volks if you play them right just as the volks can win against cons if played right. You invalidated your own argument with "good OKW" for then it would also imply a "bad soviet"; see what I am saying?

in an even skilled match volks will win against cons. and ostheer has rakwerfer at T0 for anti tank. so both axis can easily kill the M3 or M20.

and most of the time the OKW will send in a storm pioneer + kubel. now tell me how to easily kill them.

so:

wath i also hear often is that allies dont need a buff or axis a nerf because "allies can just do tactic X to kill that unit Y".

so the axis reason is, that allies can simply kill anything if they are investing much micro.

yeah of course. very fair.

so... axis gets powerful units so its much less micro intensive and allies HAVE TO STAY micro intensive because reasons?

is this fair?

no its not. this game is most of the time about microing your units good enough to get an edge over your enemy. and with the heavy micro intenesive units the allies have, they are way underpowered. as i said in an other thread earlier:

in a match with equal skill levels the axis will nearly alwayws win because the axis dont have to invest as much micro as the allies.

its simple as that.

one thing i have to add to my prevois post is, that the allies, more important the soviet, rely heavily on call ins. the axis dont need to have commander x to win. but the soviet need commander x to win. a soviet without any call ins is a dead soviet. like anti tank:

soviet su85 is good but has low armor and a panther or even a pz4 will just circle it to death.

t34/76 is... well... you know wath i mean.

and the su76.... this crap doesnt deserve any words.

so the soviets will need a commander with heavy tank call ins or guards. the axis can play how they want but the soviet dont have a huge choice. they have to play the same few tactics again and again to win.

in 4v4 i mostly see either support spam or conscript spam, but most often support spam. its followed by either a guard spam or an ISU + shocks or t85 + shocks or is2 shocks. or sometimes soviet industry.

but wath i want to say is, that a soviet player does not have a huge choice which playstyle he wants to play. the axis have much more freedom regarding playstyle and so the soviets will either lose because they did an other tactic (or they win because of bad oppenents lol) or they win but wont play soviet anymore because its boring because its always the same.

so to summon it up:

allies need much more cheaper units (all units) to "outproduce" the axis while still keeping the balance.

and soviets (and america a little bit) need much more good non doctrinal units.
as always i apologize for my english.