Profile of Alexzandvar

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561198026003886


Thread: Stuka Barrage bugged? or I remember wrong9 Aug 2015, 06:06 AM It also got nerfed like all the other flame weapons/effects in the game, so it's not really normally worth it unless you need to burn a building down. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why Tank Spam Is Not Inherently A Bad Thing.8 Aug 2015, 22:26 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Aug 2015, 22:23 PMKatitof T34/85 costs more then P4... Unless you enhance your armor with bulletins a T34/85 will beat an OKW PIV one on one, same for the Ost PIV. An up-armored OKW PIV with bulletins can kill an 85. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 2v2 Loss to Jove8 Aug 2015, 22:23 PM Uploading for advice since I got my ass kicked (although I guess we didn't lose in the first 2 minutes so that's something). In: Replays
Thread: Why Tank Spam Is Not Inherently A Bad Thing.8 Aug 2015, 21:50 PM This method of thinking is somewhat paradoxical considering if you make them cost more you can increase performance. The reason why (normally) Axis tanks a better 1v1 is they cost more, but this isn't always true. For instance IS2 > Tiger, T34/85 > Panzer IV, and so on and so forth. Spam is cheesy as hell and really shouldn't be encouraged, it's essentially brainless. Combined arms should be encouraged, not just making a fuckload of a unit until your enemy can't handle it anymore. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-76 issues8 Aug 2015, 20:08 PM There is zero reason to go for Soviet T4 outside of T34/85's or Katyusha's, which is why most people just do Soviet T3 into heavy call in's these days. It's not healthy for the game for such call in meta to continue to exist and why Relic didn't bind all call in's to teching is beyond me. The SU-76 has the Range, Pen, and ROF of an SU-85 while only having slightly less damage and less survivability (which really doesn't matter on a 60 range unit with high speed) at a fraction of the cost. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-76 issues8 Aug 2015, 20:02 PM The issue isn't that people are having a hard time with it, the issue is that it's killed Soviet T4 in 1v1 and 2v2. Why do you keep insisting that this is a L2P issue when nobody here is a noob or needs to L2P. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-76 issues8 Aug 2015, 19:11 PM Why are you accusing me of blobbing? I have like a gorillion replays uploaded that show I don't blob and I'm not a shit player. EDIT: Like the issue isn't that they can't be dealt with but that they are just to good for how much they cost compared to most other things. This is the difference between something being OP and something being to efficient. A small change is needed, that's all. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-76 issues8 Aug 2015, 18:41 PM Nobody has made the claim (nobody serious anyway) that they are OP/unstoppable, they are simply to efficient for their cost and they outshine anything else Soviets can make. Soviets not having to go T4 at all is silly when USF (minus 1 commander) and OKW can't refuse to fully tech. And Ostheer can't get to their T4 (which has no equivalent) in competitive games due to the overwhelming cost compared to other factions tech. Nobody is asking for it to be useless, but 50 range would certainly not make it so and neither would slightly less pen. Would the StuG be able to fight and win? Yes! Of course it would and should considering it costs a fair amount more. Maybe they are not a problem in 3v3 and 4v4 but in the competitive game modes they have basically put a bullet in Soviet T4's head. And dealing with SU-76's require far more effort then using them does especially for how much/little they cost. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stuart and Quad rush are pretty retarded,but....8 Aug 2015, 17:43 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Aug 2015, 17:39 PMQueenRatchet123 Light armor rushes are NOT a problem, It just the m5. Guards are not op. Why? They don't have any snares and they are doctrinal. Ok lemme just end this. If YOU cannot see how buffing both volks and grens in both AI and AT is op? I dunno what to tell you..... Again, because ONE unit is overpowering. EDIT: Think of the trade off, AT rifles mean no LMG42 or Shreks/Cold Protection. if you look at the infantry DPS on the PTRS it isn't that fantastic compared to say a regular Kar98k. Guards can also slow tanks with button so... This would just offer more options than just going Puma every time or rushing to T2 to get a Pak ASAP. Also do you think Conscript AT rifle packages are OP? Because they have a snare and AT rifles. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stuart and Quad rush are pretty retarded,but....8 Aug 2015, 17:35 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Aug 2015, 17:31 PMQueenRatchet123 One unit is OP (m5). Nurf the m5 instead of making other units op. Your logic: USF stuggles against long range TD's. Jackson should get an ultra-sniper upgrade for 90muni, granting it 100 range and 70 sight with the ability to reveal cloaked units Do you think Guards are OP? Because they counter light vehicles while not having to pay for their PTRS's, or having to be teched for, or having a build time. You are seriously overestimating how powerful AT rifles are. Light armor rushes are a problem in general, not just the M5 Quad Mount. EDIT: Think of the trade off, AT rifles mean no LMG42 or Shreks/Cold Protection. In: COH2 Balance