Profile of Alexzandvar

Jump back to quoted post4 Mar 2015, 05:57 AMJadame!

Rifles Doc usefulness depends on map. If there many close combat (lienne right) or buildings (ettelbruck) it is super good. Spam rifles, spam elite rifles, rush bars, roll over everything, never tech past t1 and dump all free mp into fuel caches.

Thing is in scenario where there is only one usf player, that usf player should go jacksons, because they THAT good, and therefore, there is no reason to play rifles.

Recon only semi-useful thanks to pathfinders barrage, aside form it this doctrine is total garbage.

Jump back to quoted post4 Mar 2015, 03:48 AMturbotortoise

Here, here.

The E8's are wayyy too expensive for what they do, and come way too late. The flamers and phosphorus are nothing more than a munitions sink, and what you're left with are rifles which, I suppose can be handy in the first 2 minutes timing wise, flanking a position quickly, or replacing a squad lost in the late game, giving them a leg up from stock, but otherwise you're left fighting without any doctrinal units or abilities which realllly hamstring you. They don't match the flexibility in the airborne or... and I know Alexzandvar will disagree with me, Recon.

Jump back to quoted post4 Mar 2015, 01:54 AMelchino7

Regarding the Su85.
It doesn't neccesarily needs to be a stun/paralize. It could be a debuff similar to button on which the tank get slower.
I also mention it could be a damage buff instead, eventhough i would prefer my first idea. This rewards someone who previously anticipated the opponent, and gives more windows of opportunity to the Su85 before it loses it's range advantage.

Offtopic: remember that Stugs are 80f, just 10 more than a T70.