Profile of Alexzandvar

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561198026003886


Thread: Should PTRS be stronger?5 Mar 2015, 22:11 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2015, 21:05 PMAustralian Magic Target Weak Point At least button was breakable. TWP is not. Button used to totally lock down a tank and made it stupid easy to kill with AT weaponry. I would rather have old button than mark target in 90% of situations. Using a few guard squads you could basically make any enemy armor useless with just a small amount of micro. -Defensive stance: (theres a simil ability on the no retreat no surrender commander) unit's can't move but get increase accuracy. We already have Para's and 1919 riflemen no thanks. -I dont' want RNG crits, and i'm not sure of the way of implementing PTRS dealing other types of crits. Yeah RNG crit stuff is silly. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: 4vs4 as allied5 Mar 2015, 22:08 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2015, 21:43 PMelchino7 And you forget the MGs dealing the same DPS as a Tiger with Gunner, increased vision, target weakpoint and more HP. It has 200 more health, that's 1 shot from a Jackson, really I just think the IS2 is better overall due to coming in early and the fact it has a much higher chance to push enemy AT off the field. The Tiger really doesn't need any changes, just a minor cost reduction. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Sturm pioneers are overpriced5 Mar 2015, 22:03 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2015, 21:20 PMAustralian Magic Im just wasting time to show you, how wrong you are... I moved even further - red cover for Obers. Similar distance to Paras vs SP. Want me to move them closer? Effect will be the same. You got messed up by RNG pal I'm sorry but them's the breaks. Really Sturms aren't much of an issue, they are expensive. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sturm pioneers are overpriced5 Mar 2015, 21:07 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2015, 21:02 PMAustralian Magic God... I dont have words to describe you... It does not matter what range it is, since Paras have higer DPS. They inflict more damage at this range. It's about brutal veterancy from engineers troops when compare what pure combat troops get. It's like 2/3 Paras with thompsons vs 4 Obers with LMG at close combat. Who will win? Of cource that Obers So If I throw smoke at Grens with LMG, Grens will move into my Shocks? 3 Para's at close range with annihilate Obers. The Thompson is the highest dps small arms gun in the game! The fact that you got beat in close range by Sturms that had Vet proves nothing other than the fact you chose your battle poorly and lost. EDIT: And no, but if he wants to kill you to stop you from capping he will have to come to you! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should PTRS be stronger?5 Mar 2015, 21:03 PM Negate cover means pretending it doesn't exist. It's a powerful ability, and rifles are much more accurate and less RNG than mortars and artillery are. Soviets do in fact have options to deal with vehicles other than guards, but guards getting a reduction in the drop chance of their weapons while the PTRS gets some help would make them all round good and worth it. Not everything needs to be just 6 guys with 2 LMG's. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Sturm pioneers are overpriced5 Mar 2015, 21:00 PM Ober's will lose to shocks in close range. You lost to Sturms close range. This really isn't that hard of a concept to get. And the point of smoke is you throw it to make him come to you, not so you can rush at him. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should PTRS be stronger?5 Mar 2015, 20:53 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2015, 20:50 PMbraciszek If i wanted to kill units in cover, i would use much cheaper and efficient stock options/choose a commander with units/options that do it 5x better... So id rather have the option to throw it on the ground and bury it forever. Being able to negate cover is something only 1 other unit has in the game, IR StG 44 Obers. And trust me it's a good ability. Why do you want to bury the PTRS? It would be nice if guards stayed a light anti tank squad with utility instead of becoming Para troopers 2.0. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Should PTRS be stronger?5 Mar 2015, 20:44 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2015, 20:42 PMAustralian Magic Huge buff for PTRS or give us back old button. Yeah the ability to instantly declare a tank dead if it approaches your guard squad is obviously balanced. Button could use a buff/change, but fuck if it needs to be old button. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Should PTRS be stronger?5 Mar 2015, 20:43 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2015, 20:31 PMbraciszek Point? PTRS actually destroys cover and team weapons, and there are many more useful ways that are anti-cover (forever mentioned superior indirect fire?). Shooting THROUGH cover could matter less given panzerschrecks and bazookas have more AI than an AT rifle... So what could make an out-meta'ed piñata be worth building by a real player... Shoot through cover, as in, do damage to infantry behind walls and buildings which is how the PTRS and similar anti tank rifles were used. The Pshrek and Bazooka are 1. More expensive than the PTRS and 2. Rocket based anti tank, not hard round based anti tank. Being able to hit and kill units in cover would be a pretty big boon for guards, and would make them have a definite roll besides "being shit". In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Sturm pioneers are overpriced5 Mar 2015, 20:22 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2015, 20:15 PMAustralian Magic It does not matter. Paras have higher DPS. Full health. Its all about bad rng but insane vet. A. Never get into close combat with Sturms. B. If your losing retreat, Sturms have much less DPS on the move. and C. Don't give Sturms hugs with your LMG infantry. Do you also think Ober's should beat Shocks in close combat? In: COH2 Balance