Profile of Alexzandvar

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561198026003886


Thread: Patch March 31st changelog31 Mar 2015, 01:55 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2015, 01:53 AMTatatala Sure they will, they just have to upgrade now. You'll have to make one less shrek squad to compensate. You just won't be able to spam dem Obers no more. Can anyone tell me what's salty and wet? Nope it's not Alex's pussy I'm talking about... The LMG34 got nerfed to, and it doesn't change the fact people are just going to spam Fuss and JLI thanks to this lol. In: Lobby
Thread: Patch March 31st changelog31 Mar 2015, 01:50 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2015, 01:46 AMBanillo how will obers now compare to lmg paras and rifles? Not very well. In: Lobby
Thread: Patch March 31st changelog31 Mar 2015, 01:18 AM I like how they say blobbing is an issue, and then in the same page only nerf 1 factions ability to blob. In: Lobby
Thread: Patch March 31st changelog31 Mar 2015, 01:12 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2015, 01:09 AMG4bb4_G4nd4lf Why did you compare their point blank DPS? Do Rifles have a secret teleport ability to spawn directly in front of enemy troops? No, they don't. You have to close in and while Rifles close in, Obers shoot at them and probably kill some models before they even get into effective range. Now If the rifle squad kills a single model it reduces the Ober's DPS by 1/4, if the Obers kill a single rifle model it reduces their dps by only 1/5. Rifles have more than enough time close the distance, and most maps are small and littered with cover anyway. In: Lobby
Thread: Patch March 31st changelog31 Mar 2015, 01:11 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2015, 01:08 AMThe Silver Sage All I can say is Relic's own data showed the discrepancy to be overperforming in favour of axis heavies. Now axis will have to work just as hard to destroy Allied vehicles while preserving their own. What makes you think allied medium vehicles were any more viable against shreks and panther than viability of axis mediums that you are worried about? What you're worried about now has been the reality for allied players for a long time. Allies have to rely on vehicle based AT and it's not out of choice. Well, the ZiS is quite good. Soviets don't really lack for AT options at all. USF needed a better AT or something and better Zooks instead of a Jackson buff (IMO). Axis mediums either don't exist (for OKW) or are to expensive (Ostheer), the Jackson really didn't help these matters either since the only 240 damage tanks Axis had were 245 fuel+. In: Lobby
Thread: Patch March 31st changelog31 Mar 2015, 01:04 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2015, 01:01 AMG4bb4_G4nd4lf So, a supposed long-range squad is dealing slighlty less DPS AT CLOSE RANGE than a close-mid range squad? OMG. And Grens do more damage at long range than Rifles to, still doesn't stop them from being totally outclassed. And Obers are 120 MP more expensive than Rifles and cost more to reinforce, why should they be worse? In: Lobby
Thread: Patch March 31st changelog31 Mar 2015, 00:59 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2015, 00:56 AMJHeartless Just wanted to point out that with the Jackson on the field you will know the Pain of USF when Paks or Panthers are on the field. All Pen all Day every day straight to HPs. Better get good at your tank micro. (still think it should do 160 a shot not 200) And post the numbers I am too tired to look. If they are then LOL without a decrease in MP cost... Ober rifles do 6.8 at point blank range. 6.8 * 4 = 27.2 Rifles do 29.4 DPS at point blank range. In: Lobby
Thread: Patch March 31st changelog31 Mar 2015, 00:52 AM I can't believe no one has mentioned the fact Obers now have the same DPS as rifles do now lol. In: Lobby
Thread: Patch March 31st changelog31 Mar 2015, 00:50 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2015, 00:48 AMdrChengele So in your mind Jacksons get veterancy, but the Panther is vanilla? Alright then, with a few Schrecks around those Jacksons will have 0% chance to pen the Panther because destroyed guns don't shoot. Theorycrafting. I was merely contradicting the blatantly false statement that 2 Jacksons can now two shot a Panther "most of the time". Well, the Jackson will be a lot easier to vet up now they have a much higher pen chance versus all Axis armor. Also you can't fault allied players for being happy about these changes, it was quite clear most of them were needed. Axis heavies have enjoyed their armour vs. penetration discrepancies for too long. Axis had better armor versus pen because axis mediums don't exist or are not viable. Costly heavies SHOULD be well armored. In: Lobby
Thread: Patch March 31st changelog31 Mar 2015, 00:42 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2015, 00:40 AMdrChengele At long range, 200 / 310 = 64% to pen. In order for 2 Jackson to twoshot a Panther all four shots need to penetrate. Chance for that is (0.645 ^ 4) which is around 0.13 So your "most of the time" boils down to 13% of the time or one in eight encounters. With AP shells those Jacksons will have a 84% chance to pen the Panther frontally. In: Lobby