Profile of Alexzandvar

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561198026003886


Thread: Balance of power has shifted to Allies in 4v4AT (imo)16 May 2015, 02:18 AM Jump back to quoted post14 May 2015, 17:46 PMNinjaWJ YOU DON'T NEED TO PUT TRUCKS ON THE BATTLEFIELD. YOU CAN PUT THEM IN THE BASE WHERE THEY WILL BE SAFE FROM MOST ARTILLERY Other than call in's, also not versus an opponent who is smart enough to build their artillery pieces outside their base. Regardless saying OKW should make their trucks in their base is like asking a Soviet player to refuse to reinforce his squads past 4, or ask a USF player to refuse to decrew his own tanks for repairs. Making trucks outside the base is extremely necessary for OKW; don't act like it isn't. And I mean why would someone ever even say something like....? 4vs4 P 2 2 .500 4 + 1 0 1 oh........OH In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: 2vs2 Winrates15 May 2015, 21:53 PM Jump back to quoted post15 May 2015, 21:47 PMKatitof You really went over yourself with the bullshit here. On games I work I can get data on absolutely EVERYTHING effortlessly, player stats, gear, levels, currencies they have etc etc. And you think relic doesn't have a simple data on win loss ratios for all factions in different brackets? Are you that stupid when it comes to game design and data tracking? No that is literally what I just said. Relic has easy access to the win rates, and thus can report them much easier BUT the end result is the same as what the OP did unless Relic decided to go more in depth or cover more game modes. See my above post, Relic pulling a number from the battle server and going "here you go guys" ends the same way a dude using sample sizes does except probably with the smaller margin of error. This assumes of course the battle servers are infallible, when everyone knows they aren't. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: 2vs2 Winrates15 May 2015, 21:45 PM Jump back to quoted post15 May 2015, 21:42 PMBurts Why exactly are you spreading bullshit again? Please stop. Relic gets number from battle servers -> reports numbers Dude watches game sped up until the end -> reports numbers The end result is the same, one just takes longer. Theoretically you could simply code a bot program to watch matches all day every day and report who won with little effort required and no connections to Relic needed. When and or If Relic releases their numbers, I doubt they will be much more different than the OP if they count the same things he did such as drops. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: 2vs2 Winrates15 May 2015, 21:39 PM Jump back to quoted post15 May 2015, 21:36 PMKatitof We'll still be good with legends data if relic allows him to post recent one. His sample was much more accurate as it was data straight from relic. Relic get's data the same way the dude in the OP did. Blind reporting on win rates without focusing on a particular skill bracket or organization of players. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: 2vs2 Winrates15 May 2015, 21:32 PM The amount of hand wringing about this in combination with the amount of melt downs people had in the Allies/Axis 4v4 thread when the OP stated the large win streaks being accrued by Allied AT's tells me I was fairly on point that people are bitter from the old OKW days and Tiger Ace days and will continue to harp that Axis are OP until the end of days. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: 2vs2 Winrates15 May 2015, 20:05 PM 1. axis lovers are trying to grab on to anything to prove that their beloved factions are underperforming Oh boy are you going to be in for a surprise 2. some people need to get a life Company of Heroes 2 886 hrs on record PlanetSide 2 327 hrs on record War Thunder 308 hrs on record In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: 2vs2 Winrates15 May 2015, 19:50 PM Jump back to quoted post15 May 2015, 19:35 PMKatitof How did he watched 1000 games, made sure there are no AT teams so his "RT only" is valid, made sure its not rank 100 vs rank 2000 games, but similar skill level of teams and didn't took 10 months to do it again? Thats not any kind of data at all. There is too much data and variables to believe any other data then that provided directly by relic sadly. What happened to Legends and his data compilations from relic? The vast majority of games end before 20-30 minutes, so it's not really that absurd considering if you account for drops, surrenders, loss of connection, ect. He also didn't specify randoms, he specified he looked at only random matches. I think a lot of people ITT are squirming because this data breaks the narrative that Axis are OP. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW Op.... really?15 May 2015, 15:19 PM Are we seriously considering the insane idea that 1 munitions = 2 MP? What fever dream did you clowns pull this from? By that standard my Panzerfuss should be really kicking ass ((90/.8)x2)+290=515 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: No tech demo just poor design.15 May 2015, 07:28 AM I'll never the TAB's obsession with me, nor will I ever get the whole "gotcha" culture that exists around this forum were people will bring in out of context statements to try and drive home an insult aimed at a poster that has nothing to do with the topic at hand in an attempt to derail the thread. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: No tech demo just poor design.15 May 2015, 07:25 AM Jump back to quoted post15 May 2015, 07:15 AMFul4n0 keep trying it man!!! lol, it is not only that you don´t know what you´re talking about, it is that you don´t even know what you have said in the past.... you were talking about nerf or removal, not only removal xDDD. keep trying it man!!! Key word being "for every", removing or changing the demo makes sense as Soviets are not lacking at all in the squad wipe department. Artillery, Katyushas, and Shocks still all exist. USF however has very little in the AT department other than the Jackson and nerfing it would make things very hard for USF. Taking a statement out of context just makes you look retarded, unless you want to challenge the fact that Soviets are not lacking for blob counters. In: COH2 Balance