Profile of Alexzandvar

The jagdtiger comes with infantry that has huge visual range with a 90 ammo upgrade cost. I agree that the elefant is better than JT, but it's still the toughest tank in the game with the longest range. Why wouldn't I stun a churchill so my paks can get more shots in? In my experience it's an incredibly useful ability, and I've never seen this ''escape after being stunned''situation you described.

The amount of DPS you are doing is significantly lessened unless you instantly attempt to use stun shot right after it fires as you are forcing it to reload. Also stun shot is better used on Pak's because it's a guaranteed chance to pen anyway. Against tanks with 640 or near that health Elefant stun shot isn't very useful. It's not about escaping after stun, it's escaping BECAUSE you tried to use stun.

Pfuss are excellent, yes but later on in the game were you are having to micro like crazy it's hard to always dedicate squads to baby sitting the JT and preventing flanks. It's also such a massive investment that leaves you wide open to enemy infantry and tank spam because you just dumped the equivalent of 367 allied fuel into one tank.

They face worse AT since they have higher armor and allies AT weapons do not have higher pen values than axis counterparts.

How are you supposed to hit the rear armor of a jagd without swarming the enemy with all of your tanks?

All unit values and stats are tied to cost, not faction. Axis tanks don't magically have better armor because Krupp Steel they have better armor because they cost a fuckload more. It wouldn't make sense for cheaper tanks to have better armor now would it?

And you can hit the rear armor of the Jadg by pulling a deep flank with fast tank like Sherman/Easy Eight/T34 variants, ect. Or going in with PIATS or Zooks. The Jadgtiger also can easily be stun locked by just shooting at it (you don't need to pen it to stun it).

I did play with them. I use them every game and I never lost them!

If your confidant in this you should link your playercard. Until you do this statement is meaningless.

Since when is a JT or an elefant a rare sight in 2v2s? The same mode where churchill spam becomes relevant? Unless I missed a memo and every 1v1 game is a churchill rush into more churchills

Statistically most games don't last long enough for 14-15 CP units to enter the field and the Churchill hit's the field around 8-9 CP's. Going Churchill every game has been the 1v1 meta since release dude.

Show Spoiler

TLDR: Churchill current performance is fine,its cost for its performance is not.

I agree with pretty much everything you said. So I have no idea whats with all the hostility. You made a good point that spamming LeiG's and going Spec Op's is the best counter to Brits, in fact, it's pretty much the ONLY counter.

I haven't been posting lately because of IRL and the fact as you said the game is buggy and broken atm and I'm tired of all the toxicity on the forums (being treated like shit for months despite doing your best to bug report and help people sucks). Hope this Helps.

Please provide examples of this bias. I'll refresh my extractor.

which still isn't a guarantee against moving target. Not to mention it's still one additional challenge you need to keep track of in a game.

If you're busying control your tanks, you're probably not manually launching your PIAT. How long before people leaving to dodge in a curve to avoid the PIAT?

If you attack ground to were a tank is moving or in the middle of it then it will be hard to miss. I mean I would kill to have better micro rewarded with Zooks and Shreks in the same way.

Regardless, this thread is not about PIATS, I was merely commenting on them not being useless.

You can guarantee hit's on enemy vehicles using attack ground with PIAT's. Also still no addressing of the fact that Tulips have piercing which means you can skill shot tanks through wrecks and buildings.