Profile of Solved

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 37

General Information


Thread: Buff Allied "Heavy Tanks"2 Aug 2021, 18:26 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2021, 18:19 PMKieselberg They dont. Simply show a pershing destroying sqauds vs a pantehr " destroying" squads. Well , if that's the case then why does the Tiger I not reflect it's cost the same way as the other Allied "heavy tanks" with the achilles heels added by assymetrical design? Why does the worst Axis heavy tank perform so well in overall survivability , AI and AT at the same time while costing the same as the other Allied variants? I mean the Tiger I literally has stats that are the best off all worlds , with quite a low reload speed? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Buff Allied "Heavy Tanks"2 Aug 2021, 18:17 PM The pershing is literally a glass cannon and is purely doctrinal , being significantly worse over the panther , it's not even half decent at AI engagements. Meanwhile get's handicapped by up to 5 range and get's a small rear armour boost , while costing a whopping 230 fuel and 630 MP???????? IS-2 barely won in 2 engagements and lost one , the reload speed is ridiculously slow and has a fairly low accuracy per shot. The panther literally engaged it from the front while not even doing what it's suppose to do being mobile and flank to deal with the heavy threat from the rear and how does one extra snare even matter in anywhere else but a one one one game , the doctrine barely even get's picked for one vs one anyway. KV-2 is fine , nothing against it neither a problem with. Seriously , these Allied heavy tanks are over designed to a point they underperform in the very thing they where designed for in the first place , meanwhile the pershing get's outclasses by the damn panther and you telling me these tanks reflect the cost off what they should be able to do? They underperform significantly while the resource costs do not even reflect the performance off these tanks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Buff Allied "Heavy Tanks"2 Aug 2021, 16:54 PM Please Fix , this is not even funny. Pershing Vs Panther 1: Pershing beats Panther only 25% off the time while costing 35% more. 2: Ability Cost is a whopping 90 muni! Just for a situational 100 extra damage and a guaranteed pen. 3: Panther outranges the pershing , lol 4: Reload time seems to be RNG in heavy favor for the panther , going as low as 5.2 compared to 5.5 by the pershing. IS2 vs Panther Screenshot 1 IS-2 Pen values against front armour off a Panther are lower over the panther actual armour rating , making him bounce more often. The reduced accuracy also come into play compared to the panther. Supposedly the 340/140 armour rating should help this out theoreticly but in practice seems to be the absolute opposite being able to lose in a frontal engagement against a medium tank destroyer that is non-doctrinal and on top cost 35% less. KV-2 vs Panther As a howitzer it seems to perform as it should , deflection damage seems to be the primary reason that it does consistent damage without the need to pen reliably and somehow performs way better over the IS - 2. Tiger I vs Panther The combination off balanced armour , with the low reload speed seems to give a significant edge to the worst Axis Heavy tank in the game , being able to bounce reliably and deal significant damage in short periods off time while having a amazing turret traverse rate. Consistently wins against it's own Tank destroyer surviving with over 50% HP , compared to "Allied Heavy" Counter parts for the same resource cost! In: COH2 Balance