Profile of Butcher

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1217

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/butcher_ger


Thread: Fallschimjager and obersoldaten suck !!28 Sep 2015, 16:29 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Sep 2015, 16:20 PMKatitof Popping out of ambient buildings, camo, 2 types of nades, pfaust, effective at all ranges without additional side costs, self regenerating with vet. Really? The only infantry with somewhat comparable kit are commandos. Super fragile, still high reinforcement cost and price to field. For ??170?? mp less you can get a durable, cheaper to reinforce 6men squad and have the availability to get a JT. I have lost count on the times I lost full Fallschirmjäger squads senselessly due to their fragility. If I lose Panzerfüsiliere it´s usually my fault. Or you simply build Obersoldaten. Not worth choosing a doctrine for that. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fallschimjager and obersoldaten suck !!28 Sep 2015, 16:13 PM Obers are fine now. Fallschirmjäger aren´t super bad by nature. They are just not good either. For a unit that´s locked behind a doctrine, I expect more. For a unit that´s locked behind a doctrine without any other significant features, I expect a lot more. Having other doctrines available that offer good infantry (Jäger-Infanterie, Panzerfüsilier) and on top better abilites and units (Ostwind or Jagdtiger), I´m not going to choose Fallschirmäger. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Su-8527 Sep 2015, 14:28 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Sep 2015, 13:39 PMUGBEAR Remove the focus sight speed penalty when SU-85 hits Vet 2. So it's comparable to the JP4 which is far easier to get. That was removed for a reason. Su-85s backing up at maximum speed and hitting the tanks chasing them out of their range was ridiculous. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: "Blazing the Trail" bulletin have no category26 Sep 2015, 08:58 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Sep 2015, 23:34 PMWhat Doth Life?! But honestly, who cares? bulletins are a huge waste of time. 3x 10% increased vet gain on Panzer IV, MG42, Tiger, IS-2, US-Riflemen etc. actually makes a difference. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Something I don't understand about Relic - German campaign22 Sep 2015, 17:36 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Sep 2015, 17:21 PMQbix It's amazing how people still don't realize the gameplay flaws. CoH is a franchise based on WW2. The Germans lost. Period. There is no reason to start a campaign as an aggressor when you already know you won't succeed anyway. What are you going to do? Alter history? No. Therefore you will play in Stalingrad and you will lose. Your effort will not be reflected in the outcome of the campaign. This is highly unsatisfying for the player and a waste of time for the developer. Get over it. Would be an awesome depiction of how senseless war is in general. You put effort in it to achieve a local victory, yet it´s not enough. The player plays the game for the game experience, the storyline and cutscenes, not to win a virtual war. It worked perfectly fine in Tales of valor where you had to hold the gap in the Falaise pocket. Either way you lost in the end despite your achievements. This is in fact a lot deeper and more interesting than the good guy winning straight away. That being said: A German campaign would be nice, but I prefer more multiplayer content first. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Haven't seen a single bofors or 17lber since patch21 Sep 2015, 22:13 PM I prefer this over the cancerous state from the previous patch. It was ridiculous that an emplacement took about 20 Pak hits when caught without support. More so it was plain stupid that you could toggle the emplacement to fire a salvo, annihilate the attacking squad and then switch back to brace. Brace is a dumb concept to begin with and does not deserve a place in this game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Did something happen with fallshimjagers?19 Sep 2015, 09:45 AM Officially only the reinforcement cost went down 10%. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Give the KV2 some love relic!!17 Sep 2015, 20:02 PM The biggest flaw of the commander is the manpower penalty. The "manpower for fuel" option should be on demand and not be forced on you. Make it an ability you can switch on and off - similar to the OKW conversion - just with mp. Right now it´s crippling. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why the concept of "Brace" is bs17 Sep 2015, 10:12 AM British player was just trolling. I estimate the number of Bofors built in this game to be over 15. The worst thing: It almost worked. An hour long troll game with high ranked players. In: Replays
Thread: Panzer 4 Command Tank is Overperforming16 Sep 2015, 19:16 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Sep 2015, 12:19 PMKatitof You have the very explanation why it doesn't die in 4 hits like a normal P4 in this very thread. Its effective health is on panther/KV-1 level, it needs 5 penetrating hits from AT gun to die. And the T-34/85 which has the same health as a Panther. It´s also a medium tank such as the Panzer IV. Perfectly fine. Jeez, we are talking about the Panzer IV taking one shot more than a regular Panzer IV. You know what´s a real problem? Emplacements being immmune to their hard counters by pushing a button. But heaven forbid the Panzer IV takes a shot more to kill. For the first time in Coh2 history the vehicle is useful. But we can of course nerf it and switch back to Tiger/ Elefant meta. In: COH2 Balance