Then we could get rid of ridiculous things like34/76 having worse armor/hp than PIV ausf G despite being better armored with its famous 60° front armor slope.
Just a sidenote: The hull armor of the Panzer IV G/H/J was 80mm thick and German crews were instructed to angle their armor, making it pretty much as effective as the T-34s armor.
Also the T-34/76 lacked in other categories that are much more important (cupola, gun, radios, commander and gunner being the same person, no turret base, vision slits etc.). So a Panzer IV outperforming a T-34 is perfectly fine.
What I find ridiculous is the randomness of stats and abilities like weapon damage, range or blitzkrieg. This is of course owed to balance, but Panthers getting out-ranged by other anti tank units still looks silly. The same as the Jackson doing more damage than an IS-2. I wished this was somehow influenced by realism. The same goes for Nascar Panzers.