Profile of Butcher

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1217

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/butcher_ger


Thread: Soviet vehicles9 Dec 2015, 13:26 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Dec 2015, 08:15 AMA big guy 4u 2.SU-85 Oh boy. Where do I start? This supposed 'tank destroyer' bonces shots at a panther. As it should. The Panther sacrifices the 60 range of other tank destroyers/ hunters for frontal armor. Further a Panther without frontal armor would be silly. This game is not about absolute realism but is influenced by it. A strength of the Panther should be decent frontal armor. The Su-85 could do with some price decrease though. Jump back to quoted post9 Dec 2015, 08:15 AMA big guy 4u 3.T34/85 Needs a serious damage and penetration buff. It should be able to reliably penetrate the frontal armor of panthers. The same as above. It is not meant to frontally engage Panthers. The T-34/85 outperforms the Panzer IV easily and has the health of a Panther. It is strong enough. The only flaw I see, is it being doctrinal. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: WTF Relic, honestly, this is the last straw.8 Dec 2015, 22:42 PM Ah, I remember this shit from my English classes back in the days. My teacher was a native Englishwoman from Manchester. She took off points from the text I had to write because I first used "lift" instead of "elevator" and later wasn´t consequent enough and used "truck" instead of "lorry". In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Place your bets7 Dec 2015, 15:17 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Dec 2015, 15:14 PMAradan In last patch game was almost ballanced for 3v3 and 4v4. These mod is for playing with friends. And it was gg the moment you had a Brit in 2vs2. Not saying it aint the other way around now, but stop praising the previous patch as "balanced". In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: KT is too strong for the current OKW state7 Dec 2015, 09:49 AM From what I could gather here and about 10 games played in the new patch, the main problem seems to be the pricing of some units. I think the best way out is to reapply a smaller resource penalty. About 90% income in fuel and munitions would seem reasonable. Giving OKW 100% income and leaving Schrecks at their price, was doomed to prove critical. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Calliopes are OP 6 Dec 2015, 15:38 PM It´s instant death to any forward OKW Med truck. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Relic must act !!! OKW need tone down & Brtis need buffs5 Dec 2015, 23:33 PM It´s fun to not have to adapt to every single move the Allied player makes now. Playing OKW has just been reacting to the Allied players initiative during the last patch. I think some people aren´t used to face an opponent that can put you under pressure himself. The only problems I see that need to be adjusted are the cost of Schrecks, CPs to the King Tiger and a fuel cost for the Kübelwagen. Not the giant disaster some players want to make it sound like. Give it a week or two and some valid play-styles will evolve against OKW. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: The Goliath In The Bushes5 Dec 2015, 14:14 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Dec 2015, 03:12 AMFlying Dustbin What if the Goliath is driven by a little german soldier Allahu akbar. In: Lobby
Thread: OKW OP?4 Dec 2015, 11:41 AM Maybe Allied players just inflated their ranks during the last patch and are now matched versus better players? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Company of Heroes 2 vs Company of Heroes (Original)3 Dec 2015, 17:47 PM I would say that Coh2 is generally better. Both games have pros and cons. I like the flexibility of Coh2 more. You can adjust skins, decals, choose multiple commanders contrary to the three doctrines per faction of Coh1. In: Lobby
Thread: efficience, aftrer game report3 Dec 2015, 15:22 PM It´s the damage done relatively to the units cost. That´s also why you often see AT-guns with 1000+% performance stats. Lots of damage for low cost. In: Lobby