Profile of NinjaWJ

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2070

General Information


Thread: Brace Yourselves!!!! Tank Hunter Tatics is comming.8 Sep 2014, 00:42 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Sep 2014, 19:02 PMBurts this game really does not need an su-100. Please no more jagtiger/elephant/isu-152 units. Because thats what the su-100 would be, except it would have absolutely no weaknesses because it would also be very mobile. An isu-122 could work tho. An is-2 with 60 range. An Su-100 is just an upgunned SU85. Same weaknesses as SU85 which is lack of AI. an ISU122 is just an ISU152 with a lower caliber gun In: Lobby
Thread: Brace Yourselves!!!! Tank Hunter Tatics is comming.7 Sep 2014, 16:14 PM they should have added an SU100 destroyer in there In: Lobby
Thread: Wy the Axis are the better choise in 2gg27 Sep 2014, 16:09 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Sep 2014, 15:17 PMGreeb The only issue I see with axis in team games is that they have the most and the best AT units. Is a pain to play against a faction that, except a couple of pure AI units, everything else can do a lot of damage to your vehicles. In teamgames that makes easier for one of the players to spam Elite AI units to cap, push and harass. And each day they got more and more infiltration elite units (Falls, Jeager, Stormtroopers...), which makes the harassing even worse for allies. I'm tired of seeing OKW players with 3 cheaper panzerschrecks bulletins stacked because he just needs that to fight allied armor until King Tiger/Jadgtiger arrives. That makes me remember old vCoH times when in teamgames one player spammed just paks+tanks and the other snipers + vet3 Knight Cross Holders. Allied AT capabilities should increase. USF zooks should be better, and soviets should have anything better than Guards/Cons against vehicles which currently both are pushed out of the meta due to their terrible AI abilities against OKW elite infantry. reminded me of vcoh ranger bazooka spam. I agree that allied at should increase. can't say how much for americans, but guards ptrs is awful vs anything above light vehicles (although it can be okay on some lucky flank shots). conscript at nades are also short range. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: POLL : Preferred streams7 Sep 2014, 04:46 AM 1v1 because it is easier to follow. sometimes music is annoying because i want to hear the in-game sound effects In: Lobby
Thread: Wy the Axis are the better choise in 2gg27 Sep 2014, 03:42 AM Hmm i don't think the mid game and early game are too short, i just think it is inevitable that a big team game goes to the end game (unless you end it fast). The longer the game goes, the bigger Axis advantago imo In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 9-16-14 Lienne Forest 4v47 Sep 2014, 03:38 AM Hi guys welcome to another 4v4 featuring me (WJ) and Voltardark. We hope you enjoy Features: 1. Tons of tanks 2. Tons of action 3. ELEFANT TANK!!!?!? In: Replays
Thread: 9-16-14 Ettelbruck 4v47 Sep 2014, 03:36 AM Hey guys this is another 4v4 featuring me (WJ) and Voltardark. Hope you enjoy Features: 1. Urban Combat 2. A lot of infantry fights 3. Teamwork! In: Replays
Thread: ISU SquadWipe-Foundation6 Sep 2014, 20:56 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2014, 16:48 PMSUCKmyCLOCK Dude, you have literally played 54 games all as soviet all 4v4................ How in the name of god can you possibly have an opinion on balance!??? I mean no offence man but you are TOTALLY new to COH2. Please stop making very silly statements such as the above quote, you quite simply have no idea what you are talking about........ PS using an ISU as a counter to a JT is so so so so so so so so so so wrong....... I never even said anything about balance, except nerfing ISU, which people agree to doing.... I also suggested moving commander-specific units into core units maybe you can say that is "balancing". My comments come from observations in team games so obviously it may conflict with others who play other modes. However i have found that many of my sentiments match other player's thoughts about the game. I don't think my thoughts on balance are wildly different than others, because i have come to the same conclusion on certain issues. Anyways, on the comment about using ISU to counter KT and JgdT, i apologize for not clarifying my thoughts. Obviously, a 1v1 situation involving ISU and an Axis superheavy is going to spell doom for the Soviet player. In the late game though, both players will have the superheavy and support units+infantry. ISU does a lot of damage, so it allows a player to have a fighting chance against these Axis heavies (obviously with support units etc). Because of its significant damage, it is sort of a "soft" counter to Axis heavies. When you nerf the ISU (depending on how drastic the nerf will be), it pigeons players into using the IS2 commanders to counter Axis heavies. People already complain about worthless commanders, so these changes may lead to more commanders being neglected. Plus, nerfing a unit without looking at the relationship between that unit and its native faction and opposing factions can lead to serious consequences. Look at Soviet nondoc roster in terms of AT and tanks. 1. At Gun 2. T34/76 3. Su76 4. SU85 AT Gun is fine but all those other units are really midgame units. You really cant defeat Axis late game armor (unless they make big mistakes and im not talking about a frontal assault either . don't forget, Axis have better AT guns and AT infantry too). So nerfing the ISU does not really matter to me but please look at the Soviet core roster; please give it a weapon that can do some decent damage against heavies. Anything like a SU100 or moving the T34/85 into an upgrade would be great change. I don't want anything OP or dominating, it can be a pure late game change. I hope you understand where i am coming from In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wy the Axis are the better choise in 2gg26 Sep 2014, 16:59 PM Yes it seems like Axis are more favored in teamgames 3v3 and up. A lot of people have said already why in past topics. Mostly it comes down to: 1. More resources=more fuel for Axis 2. Axis have stronger late game tanks and veterancy 3. Team games generally go to late game (favors Axis) 4. 3v3 and 4v4 maps are campy and favor defensive playstyle which also favor Axis In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Which Commanders are players using (Stats)5 Sep 2014, 22:25 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2014, 22:19 PMTobis I'm thinking they don't want to release them because it will strongly suggest which commanders are the best and should be used, and even fewer players will use the unpopular commanders because they now know how few people waste their time on them. It would have the opposite effect of what they would want, and reinforce players choosing only a few commanders. and force them to do work In: Lobby