Profile of Darkaisa

Avatar Area

Offline United States
Posts: 1

General Information
Last Visit Time: 15 Jul 2014, 18:29 PM
Website: http://masterjohnny.com
Facebook: Darkaisa
Twitter: Darkaisa
Youtube: Neokaisen
Steam: 76561198021660547
Residence:

Puerto Rico
Nationality:

United States
Timezone: America/Puerto_Rico
Game Name: Darkaisa

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Company Of Heroes 2 US M1 75mm Pack Howitzer15 Jul 2014, 18:15 PM This is my first time posting an opinion on Company of Heroes 2. I have made mods in the past for a variety of games including Civilization 5, World in Conflict, Command and Conquer Generals and a few other games usually based on my experience from my current military service (12 years and counting). I understand the ratio-conflict discrepancies that can arise between REALISM/FUN and STRATEGY/BALANCE. Since I like to think of myself as a fellow gamer with some programming-developing skills I will try to make an objective evaluation and state my opinion on this unit: Right now the Pack Howitzer in my opinion is underperforming significantly. Why? Let me answer you with a comparative question: Do you think this unit, being double the price of a normal mortar, performs better than a cheaper – more agile mortar unit? THINK AGAIN! I did my usual testing on a special map and determined something interesting. First let’s analyze the facts: M1 75mm Pack Howitzer "The M1 Pack Howitzer fires a light 75mm round. The M1 is light enough to be moved by its crew and can be used against all targets. Effective against massed infantry and static targets." Manpower = 480 Upkeep = 11 The Pack Howitzer functions similar to a Mortar. Use it to provide long-range indirect fire against infantry and light targets. The Barrage range of this unit is considerably longer than average mortars, and also packs a bigger punch. Tip: Keep the unit behind your lines, like all weapon teams it is vulnerable to flanking and small arms. Use the Barrage to reach targets outside of the normal fire range. According to this information and other game information, we can conclude a few facts: 1. The Pack Howitzer is supposed to function similar to a Mortar 2. The ordnance used is lighter than the soviet PM-41 82mm Mortar Squad: 82mm > 75mm 3. It costs more than the soviet PM-41 82mm Mortar Squad: 240 Manpower 4. It has more upkeep than the soviet PM-41 82mm Mortar Squad: 6 Upkeep 5. Tier 3 Unit According to these facts we can expect a performance/logic ratio respectively: 1. The Pack Howitzer should attack from significant range and perform similar to a mortar. Performance should be calculated based on tier level and unit price. 2. The ordnance used is lighter than the soviet PM-41 82mm Mortar Squad (82mm > 75mm). Weapon platform have wheels (infantry is not hand-carrying the weapon), munitions are smaller and have less weight than ordinary mortar shells, and ordnance detonation have less recoil. 3. It costs 480 Manpower, 100% more than the soviet PM-41 82mm Mortar Squad or 200% the total price of a normal mortar unit. 4. It has more upkeep than the soviet PM-41 82mm Mortar Squad. (11 Upkeep > 6 Upkeep) Population Cap level means that this unit should have a high risk/reward ratio. 5. The M1 75mm Pack Howitzer is a Tier 3 Unit. Performance should be calculated accordingly. This is my opinion difference on these facts: 1. The M1 75mm Pack Howitzer attacks from significant range, however it does not perform similar to a mortar based on a comparison side by side to the soviet mortar. The PM-41 82mm Mortar Squad gets 150% - 200% more kills than the M1 75mm Pack Howitzer in the same amount of time under the same conditions. 2. The ordnance used is lighter than the soviet PM-41 82mm Mortar Squad, however unit moves slower, readies weapon slower, fires shells slower, and reloads the barrage ability slower than an ordinary mortar. 3. It costs 480 Manpower. By being 100% more expensive than the soviet PM-41 82mm Mortar Squad I expect it to be 100% better in performance, not worse. 4. It has more upkeep than the soviet PM-41 82mm Mortar Squad. The soviet mortar has more kills and more veterancy at the late stage of the game than the M1 75mm Pack Howitzer. With almost double the Upkeep costs it should be the other way around. 5. The M1 75mm Pack Howitzer is a Tier 3 Unit, but in my opinion, based on the previous facts, it performs worse than the German GrW 34 Mortar Team Tier 1 unit. A unit on this Tier level is expected to have more WOW feeling than a Tier 1 unit. Programming logic Error perhaps? PS: I will not only complain-rant-cry and write a testament just so a fellow gamer can call out “US FANBOY” or “L2P”, I will also provide possible solutions to iron out this unit: Nerf all other units and make this unit the “mozt powelful ever” (Joking) Leave all other units the same and buff this unit to make it the “mozt powelful ever” (Another joke) 1. Significantly increase unit movement and readiness speed (US units should be powerful and fast, but fragile, right?) 2. Decrease the time between firing and the barrage ability reload time 3. Increase the salvo shells fired per barrage to double of the mortar (Costing 480 double the price of a normal mortar is only fair) 4. Make the price of the unit significantly cheaper to match the current unit performance 5. Adjust the unit risk/reward ratio by increasing its accuracy and decreasing the scatter. The current unit slow projectile travel rate should keep evading enemy units alive for a large amount of time until out of range. These value changes will add value and interest to the M1 Pack Howitzer unit and make the US forces a true versatile faction without the need of a doctrine to fill up the gap. If this change prove to be an over extension then modify based on the new base values in order to discontinue the over extension modification behavior presently recurrent in the dev team. My review: This unit cannot effectively show its potential to provide long-range indirect fire against infantry and light targets. This only leaves you with enemy static targets to deal with, but this unit does not cause enough damage to static targets in a timely manner to compensate for its expensive price. The US forces are supposed to be a versatile faction ready to deal with every situation without mastering any situation, this gap in the faction’s ability to have a decent innate (doctrine-less) unit capable to deal with enemy infantry concentrations and light vehicle defenses defeats the purpose and origin for which the US faction gameplay stands for. For this reason, ‘INFANTRY COMPANY’ doctrine is almost always the only doctrine you can pick if you wish to fill the gap for a competent mortar unit – and even still the mortar half-track underperforms as it currently is due to necessary basic abilities costing munitions when they should be free and high scatter and target misses. I wish I could provide the numbers to prove my opinions and some facts, but the code for these statistics is owned by a third party company known for their strategy guides. If you agree or disagree, please comment why in the section below. Please, leave constructive criticism and prove Company of Heroes community is the best gaming community out there. Thank you for your reading time. In: COH2 Balance

Thread: Company Of Heroes 2 US M1 75mm Pack Howitzer15 Jul 2014, 18:15 PM

This is my first time posting an opinion on Company of Heroes 2. I have made mods in the past for a variety of games including Civilization 5, World in Conflict, Command and Conquer Generals and a few other games usually based on my experience from my current military service (12 years and counting). I understand the ratio-conflict discrepancies that can arise between REALISM/FUN and STRATEGY/BALANCE. Since I like to think of myself as a fellow gamer with some programming-developing skills I will try to make an objective evaluation and state my opinion on this unit:
Right now the Pack Howitzer in my opinion is underperforming significantly. Why? Let me answer you with a comparative question: Do you think this unit, being double the price of a normal mortar, performs better than a cheaper – more agile mortar unit? THINK AGAIN!
I did my usual testing on a special map and determined something interesting. First let’s analyze the facts:

M1 75mm Pack Howitzer

"The M1 Pack Howitzer fires a light 75mm round. The M1 is light enough to be moved by its crew and can be used against all targets. Effective against massed infantry and static targets."

Manpower = 480 Upkeep = 11

The Pack Howitzer functions similar to a Mortar. Use it to provide long-range indirect fire against infantry and light targets. The Barrage range of this unit is considerably longer than average mortars, and also packs a bigger punch.
Tip: Keep the unit behind your lines, like all weapon teams it is vulnerable to flanking and small arms. Use the Barrage to reach targets outside of the normal fire range.

According to this information and other game information, we can conclude a few facts:
1. The Pack Howitzer is supposed to function similar to a Mortar
2. The ordnance used is lighter than the soviet PM-41 82mm Mortar Squad: 82mm > 75mm
3. It costs more than the soviet PM-41 82mm Mortar Squad: 240 Manpower
4. It has more upkeep than the soviet PM-41 82mm Mortar Squad: 6 Upkeep
5. Tier 3 Unit

According to these facts we can expect a performance/logic ratio respectively:
1. The Pack Howitzer should attack from significant range and perform similar to a mortar. Performance should be calculated based on tier level and unit price.
2. The ordnance used is lighter than the soviet PM-41 82mm Mortar Squad (82mm > 75mm). Weapon platform have wheels (infantry is not hand-carrying the weapon), munitions are smaller and have less weight than ordinary mortar shells, and ordnance detonation have less recoil.
3. It costs 480 Manpower, 100% more than the soviet PM-41 82mm Mortar Squad or 200% the total price of a normal mortar unit.
4. It has more upkeep than the soviet PM-41 82mm Mortar Squad. (11 Upkeep > 6 Upkeep) Population Cap level means that this unit should have a high risk/reward ratio.
5. The M1 75mm Pack Howitzer is a Tier 3 Unit. Performance should be calculated accordingly.

This is my opinion difference on these facts:
1. The M1 75mm Pack Howitzer attacks from significant range, however it does not perform similar to a mortar based on a comparison side by side to the soviet mortar. The PM-41 82mm Mortar Squad gets 150% - 200% more kills than the M1 75mm Pack Howitzer in the same amount of time under the same conditions.
2. The ordnance used is lighter than the soviet PM-41 82mm Mortar Squad, however unit moves slower, readies weapon slower, fires shells slower, and reloads the barrage ability slower than an ordinary mortar.
3. It costs 480 Manpower. By being 100% more expensive than the soviet PM-41 82mm Mortar Squad I expect it to be 100% better in performance, not worse.
4. It has more upkeep than the soviet PM-41 82mm Mortar Squad. The soviet mortar has more kills and more veterancy at the late stage of the game than the M1 75mm Pack Howitzer. With almost double the Upkeep costs it should be the other way around.
5. The M1 75mm Pack Howitzer is a Tier 3 Unit, but in my opinion, based on the previous facts, it performs worse than the German GrW 34 Mortar Team Tier 1 unit. A unit on this Tier level is expected to have more WOW feeling than a Tier 1 unit. Programming logic Error perhaps?

PS: I will not only complain-rant-cry and write a testament just so a fellow gamer can call out “US FANBOY” or “L2P”, I will also provide possible solutions to iron out this unit:

Nerf all other units and make this unit the “mozt powelful ever” (Joking)
Leave all other units the same and buff this unit to make it the “mozt powelful ever” (Another joke)

1. Significantly increase unit movement and readiness speed (US units should be powerful and fast, but fragile, right?)
2. Decrease the time between firing and the barrage ability reload time
3. Increase the salvo shells fired per barrage to double of the mortar (Costing 480 double the price of a normal mortar is only fair)
4. Make the price of the unit significantly cheaper to match the current unit performance
5. Adjust the unit risk/reward ratio by increasing its accuracy and decreasing the scatter. The current unit slow projectile travel rate should keep evading enemy units alive for a large amount of time until out of range.

These value changes will add value and interest to the M1 Pack Howitzer unit and make the US forces a true versatile faction without the need of a doctrine to fill up the gap. If this change prove to be an over extension then modify based on the new base values in order to discontinue the over extension modification behavior presently recurrent in the dev team.

My review:

This unit cannot effectively show its potential to provide long-range indirect fire against infantry and light targets. This only leaves you with enemy static targets to deal with, but this unit does not cause enough damage to static targets in a timely manner to compensate for its expensive price. The US forces are supposed to be a versatile faction ready to deal with every situation without mastering any situation, this gap in the faction’s ability to have a decent innate (doctrine-less) unit capable to deal with enemy infantry concentrations and light vehicle defenses defeats the purpose and origin for which the US faction gameplay stands for. For this reason, ‘INFANTRY COMPANY’ doctrine is almost always the only doctrine you can pick if you wish to fill the gap for a competent mortar unit – and even still the mortar half-track underperforms as it currently is due to necessary basic abilities costing munitions when they should be free and high scatter and target misses. I wish I could provide the numbers to prove my opinions and some facts, but the code for these statistics is owned by a third party company known for their strategy guides.

If you agree or disagree, please comment why in the section below. Please, leave constructive criticism and prove Company of Heroes community is the best gaming community out there. Thank you for your reading time.

In: COH2 Balance