Profile of comm_ash

Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2015, 05:38 AMAlexzandvar

Yeah exactly, the Vet 3 Rifles and Vet 3 Cons were punching way above their cost. Yes our opponents were being kinda dumb on occasion (like the whole leaving thing) but I don't really understand why I need to recreate a perfect replay for you that tests all the changes in vacuums to show you that .56 Rec Acc on a 280 MP Squad that has 5 men is not okay.

If you want USF to play better and not like some gimmick faction for a-movers then consider more skill based options like adding elite infantry, reducing reinforce cost at vet 3, and or adjusting RE's. Because sledgehammer changes like this suck.

Insanely durable Vet 5 Volks were unbalanced, Insanely durable Vet 3 Rifles are unbalanced, Insanely durable Vet 3 cons are somewhat unbalanced but well at least they don't have freaking weapon pick ups.

EDIT: I'm really going to have to actually make that table for how much high recieved acc impacts Kar98k using unit's aren't I? Because it's a problem.

Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2015, 04:00 AMAlexzandvar

It doesn't really take a replay to show that giving 5 men squad like Riflemen with good offensive capabilities as well as a large amount of utility .564 received accuracy is uh, not a good idea. Cons are also now crazy durable at Vet 3 with .65 received accuracy and 6 men, but well at least they aren't packing a huge a punch as Rifles do.

To put this in perspective Grens only have .7 received accuracy at vet 3 and they are a 4 man squad.

List of squads that have lower members but less received accuracy at Vet 3 than Rifles current do:

Sturms
Fallsch
Pgrens and JLI (they get .568)

List of squads that have the same amount of members but less received accuracy:

Volks
Pfuss


Like if you merged a Vet 3 con model into a guard squad it will actually become easier to kill than when it was a member of the conscript squad.

Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 22:53 PMJadame!

Brit medics cost 180mp.

What a joke.