Profile of Plaguer

Avatar Area

Offline Finland
Posts: 498

General Information
Last Visit Time: 11 Sep 2017, 12:33 PM
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/RawV1
Twitter: https://twitter.com/PinkPrincessFin
Steam: 76561198036697908
Residence:

Finland
Nationality:

Finland
Game Name: Plaguer ᶠᶸᶜᵏᵧₒᵤ

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Why imo the use of L2P is not constructive.7 Jan 2016, 11:41 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Jan 2016, 21:10 PMLemonJuice since the coh2 playerbase is fairly small, imbalanced matchups (in terms of skill) happen pretty regularly. when you get stomped a couple times by X faction, you may think that theyre OP when it mights just been that the player better than you is just straight up better at the game. This is a great point, this could be easily fixed by making the Level visible to anyone (The ladder level thing) so when people load up to a game they're going to see that their opponent is Level 19 while they're level 10 and realize that the opponent(s) is more skillful But this would just cause people to make "This mm sucks" thread 15 times more In: Lobby
Thread: Why imo the use of L2P is not constructive.7 Jan 2016, 11:35 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Jan 2016, 16:14 PMMyself No actually it is not. A balance issue remain exactly the same weather it is reported by a person ranked number 1 or person ranked number 1.000 Completely wrong, let me tell you why: A player who is ranked 1 has to have extremely high knowledge of about the game, someone ranked 1500 for example might not realize how to deal with something while the rank 1 player has a easy counter for it, let's say someone is playing against sov mortar spam with OKW, can't deal with it, loses and cries. Meanwhile the rank 1 player thinks to himself "What can I do about this? Oh yeah, falls" He spawns falls, wipes mortars and wins the game easily, all this while the rank 1500 player doesn't know he can do that This is a example, I don't think someone is really that stupid to not realize something like this *I repeat: this is an example* In: Lobby
Thread: Mid-game confusion7 Jan 2016, 11:24 AM Sniper is always a great choice against usf and brits, against soviets you're not going to get too much bleed going but it's nice to have anyways Get one or two mortars against Maxim spammers or against emplacements From T2 you should get a 222 if your opponent has light vehicles on the field, and after that a Pak40 and possibly PzGren if your manpower allows you to When you're in a comfortable spot, build T3 and get a PzIV and a second pak from T2 After this you should get a call in tank, Tiger is a great choice but if you don't use a commander with tiger go for T4 Panther -> PzWerfer In: Ostheer Strategies
Thread: What can FPS can I expect with my new build?7 Jan 2016, 11:13 AM You should be able to get decent fps with medium settings In: Hardware and Tech
Thread: Running over troops7 Jan 2016, 10:38 AM Tank crushing/pushing as a mechanic is a big part in the game, allows you to punish noobs that blob and don't prepare for something like that This is counterable, sometimes even the best players gets their inf crushed if they're not paying attention, hell I've crushed multiple squads form top 10 players when they're not paying attention to capping squads on the other side of the map This is L2P, nothing really needs to be fixed Counterable? Yes Overpowerd? No Even the best players make mistakes and sometimes get crushed? Yes In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Heavy Assault Guns vs Fortifications4 Jan 2016, 18:44 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2016, 18:08 PMMyself Your opinion that fortification do not exist in COH2 is noted...no reason to go back to it again... Maybe read that post again In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Heavy Assault Guns vs Fortifications4 Jan 2016, 17:42 PM Also need to add In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Heavy Assault Guns vs Fortifications4 Jan 2016, 17:35 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2015, 17:58 PMMyself Heavy assault guns like: SturmTiger, ISU-152, KV-2 indirect, Brumbar, Dozer AVRE, should be better at dealing with Fortification like UKF emplacements, 88s, bunkers, flaks, trucks... All of these units work fine against emplacements, brumm and dozer are really in accurate tho, ST chips nice hp, AVRE one shots a Pak43 Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2015, 17:58 PMMyself SturmTiger especially does very little damage even to a Bofors if it is braced (around like 20%), and due to long time before firing one has plenty of time to use brace. That's a problem with brace, not assault guns Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2015, 20:38 PMMyself Lets see what Relic has to say about the subject: In game AVRE description: "Churchill AVRE this special designed and protected Churchill AVRE (Armored Vehicle Royal Engineers) is equipped with a massive 290 Petard mortar that fires 40 lb (Flying Dustbin) capable of levering fortification or smashing troop concentrations." So according to Relic there are fortification in game... In game description Brumbar SturmPanzer Brummbar known by its nickname "brummbar", this heavy assault gun has a 15cm howitzer in an armored casemate. It brings its gun into close range and smashes the enemy with 40kg shells. So according to Relic heavy assault gun exist and Brumbar is one of them. Can we move on to something more constructive now pls... This is a "valid" argument Jump back to quoted post30 Dec 2015, 10:08 AMKatitof What does the avre text say? "effective vs infantry and buildings" What does AVRE do? Wipe infantry and clears buildings. But this isn't a valid argument? These are about the same thing, as you said "What Relic Says", and from unit description. But AVRE one shots Pak43, Bunkers, Flak Emplacements etc, so it does what it's supposed to, as you quoted No logic Jump back to quoted post1 Jan 2016, 18:50 PMMyself So let me here your opinion on the prerequisite of actually debating this issue: 1)Do fortifications exist in COH2? 2)Do Assault Guns exist in COH2? 3)Is the part of design intent of assault Guns to destroy buildings and fortifications? 1)Yes 2)Yes 3)Yes, and they do it fine, the only problem is Brace (this ability is not op) Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2016, 11:56 AMMyself Now that we cleared things up a bit, we can move to a more interesting part, which is how to buff A.G. against structures without upsetting balance. One could add some damage modifier similar to Avre against structures. One could also make it veterancy related: for instance Brumbar vet 1 ability "Bunker Busting Barrage" could have damage bonus or even bypass some of the "brace" damage reduction. For instance instead of 75% damage reduction the reduction could be lower down to 50%. A similar change could be made to the Sturm Tiger (S.T.) also by adding similar affect in vet 1 since the vet 1 S.T. is quiet useless. Similar change could be made to other assault guns like the Dozer, Kv-2 indirect, ISU-152 giving some anti-structure barrage abilities (where not available) or some structure damage modifiers with veterancy. Assault guns work great against structures right now, flats houses with a few shots (depending on the material and size of the house), bunkers and flak emplacements for example also get shredded, nothing wrong there. The thing about making these kind of units be more powerful against structures would force them to be nerfed against infantry overall, so they wouldn't just shred all the emplacements and infantry in seconds, simple balance stuff. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Heavy Assault Guns vs Fortifications4 Jan 2016, 15:59 PM If this game had pillboxes and other stronger emplacements and realistic destruction physics, then yes, assault guns would be used against them to destroy/weaken them before attacking with infantry But this game isn't designed like that, how hard is it to understand? This game isn't supposed to be a campfest behind emplacements, it's ment to be fun and have action In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Best way to counter 2 Luchs in 2v24 Jan 2016, 06:49 AM Guards should do fine for the most part and if you're suspecting that build you should try to constantly keep their fuel cut off and lay down a lot of mines In: Red Army Strategies