Profile of Tobis

I would like to see pacific front, but that would be much harder for them to make work.

North africa seems the most likely, it's the easiest to develop expansions for. Starting with brits/rommel, expanding with italy/usa. Easy peasy. Jap expansions would have to get more creative. I don't see it happening. Not while there is low-hanging fruit.

And it's all just as true and accurate as it was three and a half years ago, despite everything that has happened since.

3 new factions have dropped since, still with few global upgrades. relic pls

The reason devm lost is because he does the same strats every game. He's a great player, but luvnest knew exactly what to expect from him and prepared for it.


USF isn't the problem. He won every other match with it.

Coh2 succeeds based on better controllability and more refined game mechanics.

It horribly messed up how the factions are designed and the game plays out.


CoH1 still has:
- much better and more diverse veterancy systems (except brits)
- better faction design, with clearly defined playstyles. Coh2 is a mess of reworks and forgotten units/mechanics
- better resource system
- commander system that is meaningful and not weighed down by bloat

CoH2 has:
- units control better; reverse, better use of cover, better ai, units dont run around like headless chickens
- capping circles, vaulting, truesight. new mechanics that add depth
- less frustrating gameplay mechanics like perma cloak snipers, abilities that completely negate suppresion, and the pop cap system that made comebacks much harder


Really CoH2 has the gameplay about right. For CoH3 they just need to tweak things like garrisons. For the meat of the game they need to take cues from coh1 and come with a fully fleshed out commander system, well designed factions, and more emphasis on side techs and upgrades, besides just adding more units.