Profile of Ruinan Ding

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 77

General Information
Steam: 76561198050296995
Timezone: UTC


Thread: is2 and tiger ace10 May 2015, 02:23 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Apr 2015, 11:55 AMBeinhard Armour Profile IS-2 mod. 43 http://www.oocities.org/pentagon/quarters/4635/tanks/is/is2_armor_scheme.gif Tiger 1 Kwk 36 http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/4127/6F7013DA15824DB68D288B9CBCFCA8E7.jpg Beyond 100m the IS-2 is pretty much impervious to 88mm Kwk 36 APCBC Meanwhile IS-2 can feast on Tiger 1 from beyond 1500m http://www.panzer-war.com/img40.gif not to mention the is2 gun is so big it has to lower the gun to reload the thing In: COH2 Balance
Thread: WHAT ABOUT SU85 ??13 Apr 2015, 04:58 AM su85 has an insane fire rate. its fine the way it is In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer - MG42 13 Apr 2015, 04:53 AM you can play mow as2 if you want somethign more realistic In: COH2 Balance
Thread: is2 and tiger ace13 Apr 2015, 01:44 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2015, 16:21 PMGluhoman >is2 better killing infantry than tiger Are serious? Is2 have poor accuracy firing on infantry, tiger is better in that way. Is2 is balanced, it's good at tank but bad infantry killer. Tiger is worth in at way, but in killing infantry it is much better than is2. perhaps you are correct that tiger kills infantry better, but "bad infantry killer" sounds like a joke In: COH2 Balance
Thread: is2 and tiger ace13 Apr 2015, 01:40 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2015, 13:26 PMKatitof And you only consider advantages and disadvantages only when Tiger is put against IS-2 and nothing else, right? Well surprise: Tiger isn't there to fight IS-2 exclusively, so stop making comparisons like that. USF sherman also looses to P4, I suppose we should buff USF sherman even thou its much more powerful against infantry, but garden that, only sherman vs P4 matters and sherman looses that which is unacceptable, right? Same with SU-85 vs JP4, I suppose we should now keep adressing SU-85 buff. OR jackson vs JP4, JP4 wins that easily, Jackson needs buff. Silly argument? Why? Its being used constantly with tiger and IS-2. p4 cost more than than sherman therefor it is reasonable that a p4 wins also jackson is supposed to be used in long range. just as any TD are intended to In: COH2 Balance
Thread: is2 and tiger ace12 Apr 2015, 03:23 AM yeah. the german paks are very weak with the green cover removed In: COH2 Balance
Thread: is2 and tiger ace11 Apr 2015, 21:36 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Apr 2015, 20:43 PMQueenRatchet123 double paks with either a mine, faust, or stun. will be a dead IS2 i no longer think pak is superior than zis after the pak fire rate nerf. true that pak has slightly higher pen, fire rate, and accuracy but the fact that its green cover is removed makes it less survivable than a raketenwafer, as the racketenwafer can at least retreat. considering the removal of green cover and the fact that it only takes 3 guys to die, is2 and kats can easily melt it down unless it has heavy back up. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: is2 and tiger ace11 Apr 2015, 05:34 AM now inb4 i get called an axis fanboy from someone possibly ignorant, i believe is2 and tiger ace nerf is reasonable for both factions so take your time to read it if you want to call me a fanboy of anything: is2 over perform for its cost. it kills tiger, panther (and yes they do kill panther tank hunter from tests), it has speed that's almost similar to med tanks, and kills infantry better than tiger. comparing the is2 to its counter partner tiger, it far out perform for its cost and beats the tiger at all range. i believe the resolution is to make it slower but a still faster than a tiger (its speed doesnt even make sense for a heavy tank), will lose against tigers and panthers but increase its AoE from its HE shots to kill infantry better. the tiger ace on the other hand, is almost a free tiger for 800mp. it can simply be trashed to undo the penalty. there is really no harsh enough penalty that everyone mindlessly just summons the tank. the tiger ace can be extremely devastating on 1v1, where there are are many trades of tanks but a free tiger pops out for 800 mp. the resolution i believe is to make it cost 0 MP but permanently stops fuel income, cp reduced from 15 to 12. this will also make the doctrine more interesting as you actually need to THINK and DECIDE wither trading all future fuel income is worth it or not. the cp reduction gives player a chance to make that decision since 15 cp is very late into some games In: COH2 Balance
Thread: new coh2 okw doctrine idea30 Mar 2015, 22:45 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2015, 22:41 PMVon Kluge every axis idea? I rarely comment on threads like this so I think you're generalising. Also I'm not a mod. i cant help but to assume so based on what you commented, and i doubt anyone can, but dont you think you are generalizing as well In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: new coh2 okw doctrine idea30 Mar 2015, 22:35 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2015, 22:00 PMG4bb4_G4nd4lf Don't get me wrong, this commander is not that bad. I actually like the idea of having something comparable to Railway/Stuka Bomb available when playing OKW to counter those nasty B4s - a bit too late at 13CP and too expensive for 80 fuel tho. No fuel cost in return for a ammo cost increase and a notification for the enemy that a V2 is going down somewhere would be better. Regarding those inf call-ins... - Why so many different weapons? - Sturmgrens with 1.5 armor + LMG34 sounds a bit too strong - Volkssturm as 4-man squads and same stats as Osttruppen sounds a bit weak (well, I guess this wouldn't be a problem since we have Partisans/Irregulars) that was a typo i meant to say 680mp In: COH2 Gameplay