Profile of AchtAchter

Sov: 6.2 games out of 10 won.

USF: 5.9

Ost: 5.9

OKW: 6.5

What you have proven here?
That OKW needs to be nerfed as its clearly on the high edge here.
And the difference is still less then one game won per every 10 games played.
All of that "oh so uncounterable soviet units" and still Soviets win almost as much games as ostheer while loosing more then OKW.


Was that your aim or you're still learning to read % based tables?

As somebody who has to do something with numbers in order to pay his bills I have to remind of one small detail you hopefully just forgot to mention in the referring post.

The most played faction was OKW.
The most played game mode was 1v1.

The least played faction was Ostheer.

Therefore such tables would be never, I repeat never used to prove something when you really need solid ground.
Since most players played OKW, we can assume it has the highest player base. That means in order to reach a high rank, you need to be a better player than with ostheer e.g.(a better player is defined by a higher winning rate)
And oh wonder, OKW 6.5 / Ost 5.9

For your statements there must be furthermore made requirements which are impossible to full-fill.
Those 200 players must have the exact same skill (which cannot be, because the playerbase differs).
Or the 4 factions share the same 200 hundred players (also bs, since there are players that play exclusively one faction).


My statement towards balance:

1on1 is balanced concerning the chance to achieve a win.
However the variety of strategies in order to win is too low in my opinion. There are a few strategies for every faction that seem to work out in order to achieve a win. But that doesn't mean it's a fun way to play because there are too many units or tiers not worthy to use because it's results in a loss.
Samewise I find another balance issue is that call ins are not tied to teching, thus giving strategies involving call ins much more efficent than to tech to a ost panther or to use fule to get t34/76 instead of the 85's.

>Year is 2944

>I hear their Tiger spam and vet 3 lmg grens coming outside my HQ
>"COME OUT NOW, WE KNOW YOU HAVE T34/85s ON THE WAY"

my sides

too bad coh2's playerbase is too small otherwise we'd have such threads on /v/ & /vg/

Its annoying for USF to fight german sniper for example because it bleeds them really fast and they have no counter for it, but I don't see forums exploding because of that.

Because the M20, Dodge, Greyhound, AA track, Stuart can't be considered as counters.
Hell I once even chased a retreating sniper with a wolverine and quickly finished him off with the vehicle crew in his (empty) base.

But we shouldn't derail.

- Double Toast

You need to understand that this was written with a translator, the author is obviously russian.

I guess that means you should ideally destroy scout cars with mines, because due their speed it's hard to land an AT grenade.

5. If the Wehrmacht went in 3-4 engineer(to detect possible by the absence of Volkov), do jeep or two, otherwise it will capture the entire map and bystrye Cougars provided .....

I guess that means, if a okw gets 3-4 sturmpios (can be detected by the lack of volksgrenadiers), get out a dodge/m3 scout car, otherwise the opponent will gain quick map control and rush for pumas.