Unigine Heaven 4.0 Results pls!
5 Sep 2013, 22:26 PM
#21
Posts: 154
What I would love to see is some of the more *famous* streamers do the test and see what results they get.
9 Sep 2013, 06:23 AM
#22
Posts: 6
Here's my dime on the topic.
Running out of stream cores and vram on old card. Vram hits the most on newer games unless I drop down settings. 8xaa eats just enough of stream cores to drop down huge chunk of performance in games.
Resolution was also funny for me, i prefer 16:10 with computers, it gives that nice space for toolbar. I do videowork as a hobby and i have started to hate those 16:9 in comp use.
Main display for games is 1680*1050 so it also gives little bit of slack to old cards. Also have noted that my secondary photo/videowork 24" 1920*1200 screen is too big for me in coh. I just dont notice enough from minimap with my peripheral vision. Answer would be move away the monitor or seat and that would mean a new desk for computer.
Still current setup delivers nice bang for buck still. Reason i went to sli was 3dvision and it helped a lot with that. Next setup will be fast card first and later cheaper buddy for that.
with no aa
Valley:
3dmark:
link to 3d-mark score page
Running out of stream cores and vram on old card. Vram hits the most on newer games unless I drop down settings. 8xaa eats just enough of stream cores to drop down huge chunk of performance in games.
Resolution was also funny for me, i prefer 16:10 with computers, it gives that nice space for toolbar. I do videowork as a hobby and i have started to hate those 16:9 in comp use.
Main display for games is 1680*1050 so it also gives little bit of slack to old cards. Also have noted that my secondary photo/videowork 24" 1920*1200 screen is too big for me in coh. I just dont notice enough from minimap with my peripheral vision. Answer would be move away the monitor or seat and that would mean a new desk for computer.
Still current setup delivers nice bang for buck still. Reason i went to sli was 3dvision and it helped a lot with that. Next setup will be fast card first and later cheaper buddy for that.
with no aa
Valley:
3dmark:
link to 3d-mark score page
9 Sep 2013, 19:12 PM
#23
Posts: 154
Here's my dime on the topic.
Running out of stream cores and vram on old card. Vram hits the most on newer games unless I drop down settings. 8xaa eats just enough of stream cores to drop down huge chunk of performance in games.
Resolution was also funny for me, i prefer 16:10 with computers, it gives that nice space for toolbar. I do videowork as a hobby and i have started to hate those 16:9 in comp use.
Main display for games is 1680*1050 so it also gives little bit of slack to old cards. Also have noted that my secondary photo/videowork 24" 1920*1200 screen is too big for me in coh. I just dont notice enough from minimap with my peripheral vision. Answer would be move away the monitor or seat and that would mean a new desk for computer.
Still current setup delivers nice bang for buck still. Reason i went to sli was 3dvision and it helped a lot with that. Next setup will be fast card first and later cheaper buddy for that.
with no aa
Valley:
3dmark:
link to 3d-mark score page
Thanks for you input mate!
16 Sep 2013, 21:11 PM
#24
Posts: 154
Can Any of the streamers pls make an input? Would be so nice to see your score.
26 Nov 2013, 23:02 PM
#25
1 
Posts: 2075 | Subs: 2
27 Nov 2013, 21:31 PM
#26
Posts: 154
nice score! How is your cards? are you happy with it? how loud is it? What made you choose an AMD card over a Nvidia card (just asking)?
28 Nov 2013, 02:18 AM
#27
1 Posts: 2075 | Subs: 2
Ive only had it (single R9 290) for a day but so far its great. It matches the Titan in most things and outperforms it with a small overclock and for only $400 ($350 after I sell the BF4 copy it came with). It runs hot and loud but I have a sound deadened case so its not bad. I do plan to get a better cooler for it in the future though.
I didnt choose it for being AMD vs Nvidia, I chose it because of the performance per dollar. Titan-like performance for $350, yes please.
I didnt choose it for being AMD vs Nvidia, I chose it because of the performance per dollar. Titan-like performance for $350, yes please.
29 Nov 2013, 07:58 AM
#28
Posts: 154
I am interested in taking that BF4 code off you Bud, how much?
30 Nov 2013, 01:01 AM
#29
1 Posts: 2075 | Subs: 2
Was hoping to get $50 for it but Black Friday has kinda undercut everything BF4 at the moment.
30 Nov 2013, 17:45 PM
#30
Posts: 154
hmmm make a request, as Blackfriday then I can get it for $50 anyways!
1 Dec 2013, 04:25 AM
#31
1 Posts: 2075 | Subs: 2
Here's with a very light overclock to 1050 core without even touching the memory, its got a lot more headroom for sure. (947Mhz stock)
1 Dec 2013, 10:25 AM
#32
Posts: 154
Here's with a very light overclock to 1050 core without even touching the memory, its got a lot more headroom for sure. (947Mhz stock)
Niceb score! With my Gtx 780 I got 68 FPS average but then it was with some OC. Did not get it very stable.
For the price then its a great card, but is it really that loud? I am parranoid about the sound level of my PC - I want it dead quiet.
My GTX 780 DirectcuII at FULL load does not go over 60C and its not audible ( my case is a HAF XM)
1 Dec 2013, 22:29 PM
#33
1 Posts: 2075 | Subs: 2
Its not silent but not loud. Will be putting a custom cooler on it soon then it'll be silent.
8 Dec 2013, 16:29 PM
#34
Posts: 154
Here are some scores with my old trusty PC:
First pic is on medium settings in 1440 x 900 only
Second Pic is the same on 1440 x 900 but on the lowest possible settings:
I was playing BC2 on this pc.... at 20 fps.... I could even just play COH on low settings...
First pic is on medium settings in 1440 x 900 only
Second Pic is the same on 1440 x 900 but on the lowest possible settings:
I was playing BC2 on this pc.... at 20 fps.... I could even just play COH on low settings...
3 Jan 2014, 02:47 AM
#35
1 Posts: 2075 | Subs: 2
Got an Arctic Cooling Accellero Extreme III on it today. Started pushing the memory a bit, still at 1050 core though. The cooler keeps it from throttling at all and temps max out at 59C instead of 94C on stock lol.
5 Jan 2014, 05:39 AM
#36
1 Posts: 2075 | Subs: 2
Went and bought a GTX 780 to play with as well. Here it is at its stock clocks (its OC'd stock).
5 Jan 2014, 09:42 AM
#37
1 
Posts: 4559 | Subs: 2
Ok now that you've done your tests send me your unused GTX780 so I can play this game all max gg wp no re 
 | Playercard of Marcus2389 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
7 Jan 2014, 04:23 AM
#38
1 Posts: 2075 | Subs: 2
Here's the GTX 780 @ 1200Mhz.
To put in perspective the reference GTX 780 is at 900Mhz, this card came with 1060 out of the box, and it went to 1200Mhz without a fuss. I think 1250 or 1300Mhz is probably doable. At this speed we're approaching the same performance as the 780 Ti.
To put in perspective the reference GTX 780 is at 900Mhz, this card came with 1060 out of the box, and it went to 1200Mhz without a fuss. I think 1250 or 1300Mhz is probably doable. At this speed we're approaching the same performance as the 780 Ti.
7 Jan 2014, 04:47 AM
#39
1 Posts: 2075 | Subs: 2
Turns out 1225 was the max I could get out of it. I havent touched the memory yet though.
7 Jan 2014, 06:26 AM
#40
Posts: 11
0 user is browsing this thread:
Livestreams
 |
|
|
812 | ||
 |
|
|
20 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.599215.736+14
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1106614.643+7
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.273108.717+24
- 8.722440.621+4
- 9.1041674.607-2
- 10.17146.788+1
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1234
Board Info
721 users are online:
721 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
37 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
37 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49099
Welcome our newest member, cakhiatvztoday
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, cakhiatvztoday
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM