Ladder percentage just... stupid

Posts: 50
The ladder contains the % win which leaves you with a weird number like .785. I'm sorry to say that most people will find this interpretation of the win/lose ratio unintuitive and confusing.
Why not make it simple and understanablae so most everyone understands the win/lose ratio? Like 20 wins and 10 loses = a ratio of 2:1. Or maybe just write % like you would normally do "win ratio: 93,3%. Way easier to decode imo.
Anyway I am not surprised as the game and this forum somehow refuses to build and improve on previously tried and testet solutions that clearly work.

Posts: 252

Posts: 53
I would now like to point out how stupid this entire topic is.



Posts: 3709 | Subs: 2


Posts: 1006

Posts: 75

Posts: 150
What do you show in your suggestion for someone with 0 loss?
ahaha
end of thread
mathematics will always win

Posts: 50

Posts: 177


Posts: 1582 | Subs: 4

Posts: 934

Posts: 120




Posts: 2838 | Subs: 3
The ladder contains the % win which leaves you with a weird number like .785. I'm sorry to say that most people will find this interpretation of the win/lose ratio unintuitive and confusing.
The ratio displayed as .### comes from the tradition of expressing hitting statistics in baseball in the same way.



Posts: 16697 | Subs: 12

W/L is also expressed that way (see PCT):
http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/standings/index.jsp?tcid=mm_mlb_standings



Posts: 2838 | Subs: 3



Posts: 16697 | Subs: 12

Posts: 1164
since the win percentage is simply the ratio multiplied by 100, a person with 0 losses (and more than 0 wins) would have a ratio of 1.000 and a win percentage of 100% (@Seb/GuruSkippy).
imho, nobody here is stupid (neither the ladder, nor OP), except for maybe the guys that call other guys stupid.

Posts: 177


Posts: 1582 | Subs: 4
since the win percentage is simply the ratio multiplied by 100, a person with 0 losses (and more than 0 wins) would have a ratio of 1.000 and a win percentage of 100% (@Seb/GuruSkippy).
Its not simply the win/loss ratio multiplied by 100. That would again lead to infinity in case of zero losses.
Percentage is wins/(wins+losses) = wins/(total number of games). This one is superior to win/loss ratio due to the reason mentioned by Seb. It cannot grow to infinity but is limited between 0 and 1.00

Posts: 1164
Its not simply the win/loss ratio multiplied by 100. That would again lead to infinity in case of zero losses.
Percentage is wins/(wins+losses) = wins/(total number of games). This one is superior to win/loss ratio due to the reason mentioned by Seb. It cannot grow to infinity but is limited between 0 and 1.00
isn't that exactly what i said? i don't think i ever specifically mentioned w/l ratio... ;-)
Livestreams
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
585 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
19 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.43063.872+8
- 2.56480.876+3
- 3.800454.638-1
- 4.303163.650+3
- 5.313114.733+9
- 6.12744.743+1
- 7.194101.658-1
- 8.282161.637+1
- 9.371284.566-1
- 10.17773.708+3
Replay highlight
-
cblanco ★
-
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel
-
Heartless Jäger



Board Info
9 posts in the last week
72 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, xawem8
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM