Churchill tank is the most OP unit ingame

Jump back to quoted post2 Apr 2018, 19:41 PMblvckdream

Name: Panzerkampf
Logo: German
Thread: Allies OP, buff Axis
Verdict: Must be fair and balanced view on the game. Definitly not biased.

Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2018, 09:54 AMPanzerKampf

Triggered much Katitof? you must be a hardcore brit player. Also rank shaming is pathetic. Grow up please.

Churchill and Comet are heavy tanks just like the Tiger. Relic is so ally biased.

Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2018, 17:41 PMIncendiaryRounds

Blvckdream: "I wan't croc to have more armor than panther." Definately not biased.

Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2018, 21:08 PMblvckdream

Whats wrong with that? Croc gets penned by everything, cant fight tanks and costs 230 fuel. Does not have enough HP anymore to tank shots thus making it a useless ressource sink in 80% of 2v2s and up. Also another big issue is the Sapper repair speed nerf which makes it even less efficient.

I have seen like 2-3 Crocs in the many many games I have played since WBP, if Croc was good it would be used more often. Now it´s just ignored by competent players.

It might still be good in 1v1 but I was talking about team-games.

Give me ONE reason why Panthers should have more armor than Croc despite costing less, being non-doctrinal, and having great mobility. Panthers need buffs to either their main gun/range/MGs/accuracy I admit that. But that still doesn´t make it fair why a 230 Fuel, slow CQC tank has less armor than a Panther.

Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2018, 21:29 PMIncendiaryRounds

You basically described the Tiger's problem which has better AT at the cost of worse AI. You need to get 6pdr and firefly to support it. All allied TDs have 200+ pen while croc faces 170 pen TDs. Panther RoF is too slow to kill the croc and superheavies are nerfed and doctrinal.

Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2018, 21:08 PMblvckdream

Whats wrong with that? Croc gets penned by everything, cant fight tanks and costs 230 fuel. Does not have enough HP anymore to tank shots thus making it a useless ressource sink in 80% of 2v2s and up. Also another big issue is the Sapper repair speed nerf which makes it even less efficient.

I have seen like 2-3 Crocs in the many many games I have played since WBP, if Croc was good it would be used more often. Now it´s just ignored by competent players.

It might still be good in 1v1 but I was talking about team-games.

Give me ONE reason why Panthers should have more armor than Croc despite costing less, being non-doctrinal, and having great mobility. Panthers need buffs to either their main gun/range/MGs/accuracy I admit that. But that still doesn´t make it fair why a 230 Fuel, slow CQC tank has less armor than a Panther.

Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2018, 09:54 AMPanzerKampf

Triggered much Katitof? you must be a hardcore brit player. Also rank shaming is pathetic. Grow up please.

Churchill and Comet are heavy tanks just like the Tiger. Relic is so ally biased.

Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2018, 11:21 AMKatitof

Conscripts are long range infantry, just like grens.
SU-76 is super heavy tank destroyer, just like JT.
Please, make more silly cases, I gave you examples to follow, they make as much sense as bitching that Churchill is anywhere near tiger.