if you dont know the advantage of a 6 model squad...i dont know..maybe learn basics?
- ever tried to recrew a wepoan?
- get an arty strike?
- and cons (t0) with ppsh are much stronger than grens (t1)
and so on..
Did you try recrew with brits ? Get arty strike ?
Cons without ppsh are just trash vs grens with LMG or gev43.
You forget that models stuck in this game, so get wipe with 6 models canbe same like with 4.
If youso like 6 models, lets chage name from soviet ot osthher,andlets how you will be good with 6 models
Did you try recrew with brits ? Get arty strike ?
Cons without ppsh are just trash vs grens with LMG or gev43.
You forget that models stuck in this game, so get wipe with 6 models canbe same like with 4.
If youso like 6 models, lets chage name from soviet ot osthher,andlets how you will be good with 6 models
Is there any chance of getting STORMtroopers in STORM Doctrine? Can it be put on the docket for next Balance preview if not this one?
It just seems to make sense especially with ambush and tactical movement overlapping
IMO this is probably bad idea. Firstly, Stromtroopers are werid unit which has no special purpose and they overlap a bit with PzGrens, but secondly (and mainly) they are munition-heavy unit in doctrine that is already relying on muni (camo upgrade, riegel mines and dive bomb). Thirdly, with camo upgrade they would even more overlap with a PzGrens in terms of stealth.
In other words, there is a chance to make one more OST commander very, very useful and it cannot be dissmied so easily by putting in it Stromtroopers which will kill this opportunity.
Obersoldaten LMG34
We felt that the LMG34 would generally over perform when picked up by non-elite infantry due to the higher-than-average veterancy bonuses non-elite infantry accumulate. To account for this, we've made the following change:
Non-elite squad LMG34 (picked-up) damage from 6 to 4
what a unit call it Elite Squad Same Like PTRS Stats ?
But now I test by Use 2 Elite USF Squad Ranger and Paratrooper
Pick up 1 LMG34 and combat to some enemy squad
I see Ranger w/ LMG34 deal dmg 4 hp per hit
and paratrooper Remember paratrooper this 1 of 2 (UKF commando) unit able Fire all lmg while Moving Right ?
I mean their can fire LMG34 with dmg 6 hp per hit like obersoldaten for now
but ok This 2 unit Inf elite type now
thank for reading my question
Is there any chance of getting STORMtroopers in STORM Doctrine? Can it be put on the docket for next Balance preview if not this one?
It just seems to make sense especially with ambush and tactical movement overlapping
Like Ausie Magic said, add Stromtrooper would cause more inconsistence (and they need a lot of munitions for upgrade). Better add some call-in or munition free abilities, we do not want another NKVD doctrine that have so many munitions sink abilities.
All of these would create doctrinal overlap, Jaeger officer, artillery officer, Gren ht, mortar ht. Not fit the theme- ostruppen, command tank, puma, elephant(also overlap with jaeger armor). Create balance issues-Tiger, Tiger ace
This leaves pgren halftrack and stormtroopers to me. But since its STORM doctrine, i like stormtroopers.
They are just finalizing the patch now so i suggest this instead of a double sprint and b/c it would be the easiest to get the scope for if it is even possible to add.
Yes now they did. But as Vasa put it, if you buff Soviets, you need to buff Ostheer too. Which of course never happened back then, they only buffed penals to be terminators. His reasoning is flawed.
All of these would create doctrinal overlap, Jaeger officer, artillery officer, Gren ht, mortar ht. Not fit the theme- ostruppen, command tank, puma, elephant(also overlap with jaeger armor). Create balance issues-Tiger, Tiger ace
This leaves pgren halftrack and stormtroopers to me. But since its STORM doctrine, i like stormtroopers.
They are just finalizing the patch now so i suggest this instead of a double sprint and b/c it would be the easiest to get the scope for if it is even possible to add.
(if i forgot a callin call me out tho)
Not sure why Puma or Command PzIV don't fit doctrine. They look fine for me and would give this doctrine huge bust. Putting in Stromtroopers just because they are "storm" will kill this doctrine and there will be hardly any point to call them in since you can get stealth PzGrens. It also doesn't change the fact that this doctrine in munition-heavy and another muni ability (stormtroopers) is kinda pointless.
I guess the best solution would be to give this doctrine Puma, Cmd PzIV or mortar HT. Anything taht does not cost ammo.
You just can't put in one commander abilities which consume ammo:
- Ambush + Sprint
- Riegel mines
- Stuka Dive bomb
and one more
- stormtroopers which need 100 ammo for an stg upgrade.
You simply cannot do that.
AssaultGrens might be an option tho. They are offensive unit and they don't overlap with PzGrens.
I don't think the Munitions argument is valid. They just reworked Recon support to have 5 abilities which cost or imply the usage of munitions through upgrades or abilities and I think that's fine, and that doctrine has received a lot of positive feedback. The abilities here do not overlap in function, eg. mines, off maps, infantry upgrades, they can be all used at different phases of the game.
To me storm doctrine does not scream scout car that hunts tanks in the puma. Puma could probably work though. Don't see a balance issue or it being useless, may suffer a bit without smoke though.
Command tank and Artillery are in mechanized
Mortar HT and artillery are in festung support.
Assault grens could actually work but they aren't very good
I don't think the Munitions argument is valid. They just reworked Recon support to have 5 abilities which cost or imply the usage of munitions through upgrades or abilities and I think that's fine, and that doctrine has received a lot of positive feedback. The abilities here do not overlap in function, eg. mines, off maps, infantry upgrades, they can be all used at different phases of the game.
To me storm doctrine does not scream scout car that hunts tanks in the puma. Puma could probably work though. Don't see a balance issue or it being useless, may suffer a bit without smoke though.
Command tank and Artillery are in mechanized
Mortar HT and artillery are in festung support.
Assault grens could actually work but they aren't very good
Well, even if you don't find ammo argument valid, there is still huge overlap between Storms and PzGrens with ambush camo - in other words it feels like a huge waste to spare this one ability for something that is avaible even without it It's like adding stuka some drop to a commander that has panzer tactican. Sure they are not the same but they would overlap in 9/10 cases.
My concern about the Commander Revamps is that the team is focusing on making them "balanced", while avoiding the fact that the top tier commanders still exist and aren't going anywhere. So some of the new commanders look fun and interesting, but lighting warfare, scavenge, armor company, they all still exist and provide tools to fill the holes in faction design, while offering strong tools.
I feel the only way to make sure the new commanders are used is that they either fill a niche, or they are just as good as the OP commanders. Just my personal opinion.
Penals are line infatry ? Penals cost 240 ?
Dont cons suck from 2014 ? You whanna say ,taht in live version of game, cons are same AI like grens ? Cons deserve little buff, coz its just shame, taht line infatry with same price like have another units, suck vs them.
Coz maybe users liek you defend 2 sec reload old ostheer mortar ? And write here that he are fine, coz 4 models vs 6 ?
Yes now they did. But as Vasa put it, if you buff Soviets, you need to buff Ostheer too. Which of course never happened back then, they only buffed penals to be terminators. His reasoning is flawed.
Didnt i write that penals are broken ? From last patch, only t1 take soviets in game, coz all another strats are bad. But you can ignore taht facts that cons like AI unit are bad compared to grens and folks that have same price.