Login

russian armor
COH2.ORG » Forums » Workshop » Mapping Discussion » Crossroads by WhiteFlashReborn

Crossroads by WhiteFlashReborn

PAGES (4)down
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
Luciano
9 Aug 2017, 18:23 PM
#21
avatar of Luciano

Posts: 712

jump backJump back to quoted post9 Aug 2017, 13:54 PMWhiteFlash
Uploaded a revised version of Crossroads. Please try it out and post feedback here. The more detailed the better.

Thanks all

Changes: https://imgur.com/a/ok9H0

Map here: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=501836252



Thanks for updating it!
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Jae For Jett
9 Aug 2017, 19:44 PM
#22
avatar of Jae For Jett
Senior Strategist Badge

Posts: 1002 | Subs: 2

I'm a little bit late, and its minor, but the north players cutoff is made more difficult to hold because players can reinforce basically on the point because of how close to the point they can construct (and reinforce from) a base building. Maybe move the north players base territory back slightly if this hasn't already been addressed in your revised version?
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
WhiteFlash
9 Aug 2017, 19:52 PM
#23
avatar of WhiteFlash
Senior Mapmaker Badge
Benefactor 119

Posts: 1295 | Subs: 1

thanks for reminding me of that, i was looking at that months ago in some streams and forgot, ill reanalyze that
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
ZombiFrancis
10 Aug 2017, 00:55 AM
#24
avatar of ZombiFrancis

Posts: 2742

The green and red cover on the map that was removed never really bothered me, but the map still works just fine without it though.

Moving the burned out house is a good change. VPs seem fine.

I always figured the cutoff house's lack of windows was its weakness. But I don't mind more damaged buildings in the slightest.
Strategic Territory Points Mod:
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=604491510
Classic resource points!
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Finndeed
10 Aug 2017, 15:26 PM
#25
avatar of Finndeed
Strategist Badge

Posts: 612 | Subs: 1

Looks good! Did you remove 2 strat points as well?
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Sturmpanther
10 Aug 2017, 15:30 PM
#26
avatar of Sturmpanther
Lead Strategist Badge

Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Aug 2017, 15:26 PMFinndeed
Looks good! Did you remove 2 strat points as well?


Its still has 12 hybrid points.

Not sure if Relic will allow to cancle 2 hybridpoints at all. I mean they looked into this map and allowed 12 hybridpoints.

So both side can go faster for light vehicle tech and not only inf spam^^

Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
WhiteFlash
10 Aug 2017, 16:36 PM
#27
avatar of WhiteFlash
Senior Mapmaker Badge
Benefactor 119

Posts: 1295 | Subs: 1

Ive gotten mixed ideas on that. Im likely going to leave the 12 strat points unless i see some data or groundbreaking perspective in order to change it.

Reason being, the level of balance that the map is achieving may be driven by unseen variables and i want to change it as little as possible, but still improve it.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
0ld_Shatterhand
10 Aug 2017, 16:46 PM
#28
avatar of 0ld_Shatterhand
Donator 22

Posts: 194

Played a few matches and I have to say, that I really like it. Especially the rework of the northern cutoff is a major improvement. Way more clear and early harassments isn't that easy anymore. Also, the new VP placement feels good.
The only thing, I can think of what you could improve is to reduce the northern base area, so that it ends around the hedgerow, so Ost can't build the T1 near the cutoff anymore. But otherwise great work, it's nice to see, how one of the best 1vs1 maps gets even better.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
WhiteFlash
10 Aug 2017, 16:50 PM
#29
avatar of WhiteFlash
Senior Mapmaker Badge
Benefactor 119

Posts: 1295 | Subs: 1

Yea im going to look into the base placement, the original intent wasnt to have buildings that close to cutoff, ill let people know when it gets updated tonit, thanks Old_Shatterhand the tests are appreciated, dont suppose you have any replays?
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
0ld_Shatterhand
10 Aug 2017, 16:53 PM
#30
avatar of 0ld_Shatterhand
Donator 22

Posts: 194

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Aug 2017, 16:50 PMWhiteFlash
Yea im going to look into the base placement, the original intent wasnt to have buildings that close to cutoff, ill let people know when it gets updated tonit, thanks Old_Shatterhand the tests are appreciated, dont suppose you have any replays?

Didn´t save the replays. Maybe if I have time, I will play some more and save them for you.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
WhiteFlash
10 Aug 2017, 16:53 PM
#31
avatar of WhiteFlash
Senior Mapmaker Badge
Benefactor 119

Posts: 1295 | Subs: 1

right on, thanks sir
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
ShadowLinkX37
10 Aug 2017, 21:06 PM
#32
avatar of ShadowLinkX37
Director of Moderation Badge

Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4

Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
WhiteFlash
10 Aug 2017, 22:36 PM
#33
avatar of WhiteFlash
Senior Mapmaker Badge
Benefactor 119

Posts: 1295 | Subs: 1

Thank you sir
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
WhiteFlash
10 Aug 2017, 23:31 PM
#34
avatar of WhiteFlash
Senior Mapmaker Badge
Benefactor 119

Posts: 1295 | Subs: 1

Thanks again for playing, not sure about the cutoff house...im checking it out
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
WhiteFlash
10 Aug 2017, 23:41 PM
#35
avatar of WhiteFlash
Senior Mapmaker Badge
Benefactor 119

Posts: 1295 | Subs: 1

I just tested that house thoroughly, hit it w all kinds of stuff and tried to duplicate the stuck mg, no luck. Its prolly something in COH2. If you can duplicate that bug again to show its map specific let me know def. Otherwise im going to chalk it up to a COH2 bug instead of a map bug. Thanks again for testing and posting a replay gents
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
LoopDloop
11 Aug 2017, 00:40 AM
#36
avatar of LoopDloop

Posts: 3053

I think south has a much better position because of the house ruin, the abundance of green cover on their fuel area (makes being aggressive over there a lot easier than the southeast corner) and the fact that north's only garrison collapses from a sneeze.

Even with those faults, it's probably still one of the maps I think is really balanced.
Playercard of LoopDloop

1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P
1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P
1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P
1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P


Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
skemshead
11 Aug 2017, 09:36 AM
#37
avatar of skemshead

Posts: 611

The changes improve the map, however the side with the house on the cutoff and the timbers stacks is still at a disadvantage. This is due to the wood stacks and the shack acting as shotblockers. The second issue is the house and hedge on the cutoff makes transitioning from left to right more restrictive compared to the other starting position.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
zarok47
11 Aug 2017, 13:33 PM
#38
avatar of zarok47

Posts: 587

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Aug 2017, 16:36 PMWhiteFlash
Ive gotten mixed ideas on that. Im likely going to leave the 12 strat points unless i see some data or groundbreaking perspective in order to change it.

Reason being, the level of balance that the map is achieving may be driven by unseen variables and i want to change it as little as possible, but still improve it.


This strikes me as odd, why would you need convincing that 12 strat points should be changed, when it really should be "why change the 10 strat points every other map has".

I've listed before why the 12 strat points mess with many balance factors (teching, nades/upgrades and snowballing), and removing 2 strat points on this map is very minor (the strat points near the muni points come to mind).

Basicly, I am asking what groundbreaking perspective there is to keep 12 strat points, how does it improve balance and this map?
jump backJump back to quoted post20 May 2018, 15:21 PMFelixTHM

Being bad at the game isn't something balance patches can fix.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
WhiteFlash
11 Aug 2017, 22:04 PM
#39
avatar of WhiteFlash
Senior Mapmaker Badge
Benefactor 119

Posts: 1295 | Subs: 1

A new version was just uploaded

Changes here: https://imgur.com/a/jbQsB

If you havent already subscribe to the map here to play it: http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=501836252
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Finndeed
12 Aug 2017, 10:54 AM
#40
avatar of Finndeed
Strategist Badge

Posts: 612 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post11 Aug 2017, 13:33 PMzarok47


This strikes me as odd, why would you need convincing that 12 strat points should be changed, when it really should be "why change the 10 strat points every other map has".

I've listed before why the 12 strat points mess with many balance factors (teching, nades/upgrades and snowballing), and removing 2 strat points on this map is very minor (the strat points near the muni points come to mind).

Basicly, I am asking what groundbreaking perspective there is to keep 12 strat points, how does it improve balance and this map?


I have to agree with Zarok.

I think part of the reason OKW got around 85% win rate on this map during GCS was the extra strat points allowed them to get a luchs out even faster and also snowball into a late game where they are virtually unbeatable (at least on paper).

No other faction benefits as much as OKW from increase resource income.

Brits getting the AEC is normally more about conserving manpower.

Ost only get a 222 which isnt exactly OP, or the halftrack which is again not really expensive in terms of fuel or even really in muni. And again manpower is the greater limiting factor in their teching/getting of vehicles.

USF can go for an early Stuart but because its no longer that good against infantry its okay, plus OST and OKW have access to some of the best AT by that stage (Pak 40, raketten, faust, puma and even luchs can be a big problem for the Stuart).

Soviets will always get the T-70 later than the Luchs. Once the luchs is out, their progress towards getting the T-70 out is massively hampered by the luchs, again allowing more time for OKW to snowball.

OKW, on the other hand, can easily build up enough manpower to use the extra fuel to accelerate the luchs acquisition.



Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
PAGES (4)down
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest
COH2.ORG » Forums » Workshop » Mapping Discussion » Crossroads by WhiteFlashReborn

Ladders Top 10

UKF
USF
OKW
SOV
OST
1v1
2v2
3v3
4v4
  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

Top Tier Teams
VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Einhoven Country Honor
Honor it
9
 Download
Download
1236
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

876 users are online: 876 guests
0 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49118
Welcome our newest member, Ava Sofia
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM