Poll: The Land Matress

Jump back to quoted post26 Jan 2017, 17:30 PMLoopDloop

Ullu, I'm sorry but you're full of biased shit. First, panzerwerfer took 8 seconds, now you change it to 6, lamdmattress took 2, now you change it to 2.82 (which is still off), now panzerwerfer takes 3x longer than landmatress, but 6 is not three times 2.82 (sorry to say, but you need to check your basic math). You would have to make a Herculean effort to get your squad even hit by the first rocket in a landmatrress barrage, let alone wiped by it, and I'm pretty sure all rockets fired by rocket arty are pretty much samey in terms of damage and aoe (someone correct me with statistics if I'm wrong). One of your big bitching points earlier in the thread was that the radius was so big and now you say that it's not that much bigger than other rocket launchers. All your arguments are falling on their stupid faces man.



Footnote: in my testing yesterday I discovered that I was wrong about the land mattress barrage range being shorter. I think it's pretty much the same as the panzerwerfer.

Jump back to quoted post26 Jan 2017, 07:18 AMullumulu

WTF? Stuka cost 390Mp and 100(!!!!!) gas!
ISG is hard to kill with small arms?? wtf...which game do u play??
and to srteal a LM need a much dumb enemy brit...which use it in front of the front (wtf??)

you can bomb the enemy defence line from behind ur front (except u build ur front in ur base)

Jump back to quoted post26 Jan 2017, 21:18 PMullumulu

i said

NEARLY

..if u calc with 2sec...and with 6sec..it gives 3xtimes more to react.

u have not one single argument which is not a lie. look your other post...all of them are lies.

Jump back to quoted post27 Jan 2017, 05:33 AMCon!

where is the LM is UP option? Needs to be more consistent with its damage, sometimes it is a squad wiper other times it feels like it does nothing...

Jump back to quoted post27 Jan 2017, 05:33 AMCon!

where is the LM is UP option? Needs to be more consistent with its damage, sometimes it is a squad wiper other times it feels like it does nothing...

Jump back to quoted post27 Jan 2017, 06:55 AMullumulu

well...its like all other rocket launcher ingame..

Jump back to quoted post27 Jan 2017, 12:42 PMAradan

KT is also better than Pershing

Jump back to quoted post27 Jan 2017, 12:52 PMullumulu

that`s false. In much situations is a pershing better. KT is slow and easy to circle.

pershing is much more cheaper and doesnt need tech. And a vet3 Pershing blows the hell out from your infantery and tanks with its fast reload.

Jump back to quoted post27 Jan 2017, 13:00 PMAradan

I play KT in almost every game. I play only occasionally random 4v4, but I have no problem getting into the top 100.
Can you show us your playercard? Do you really have such problems while playing for the axis? When you play an ally, so it's easier? We can give match? I like learn more micro with Pershing, so far I have failed with him.

Jump back to quoted post27 Jan 2017, 13:00 PMAradan

I play KT in almost every game. I play only occasionally random 4v4, but I have no problem getting into the top 100.
Can you show us your playercard? Do you really have such problems while playing for the axis? When you play an ally, so it's easier? We can give match? I like learn more micro with Pershing, so far I have failed with him.

Jump back to quoted post27 Jan 2017, 13:06 PMullumulu

My fav game is 2vs2. Sometimes 3v3...but 4v4 is to creepy...everybody spam tanks or arti. This is the badest teamplay design so far in this game(my opinion)

maybe thats the reason that you think the LM is not to strong..

Jump back to quoted post27 Jan 2017, 13:21 PMVelikiStrateg

Aradan, show player card?

Jump back to quoted post27 Jan 2017, 13:22 PMAradan

little icon under my avatar
or this link playercard

Jump back to quoted post27 Jan 2017, 12:52 PMullumulu

that`s false. In much situations is a pershing better. KT is slow and easy to circle.

pershing is much more cheaper and doesnt need tech. And a vet3 Pershing blows the hell out from your infantery and tanks with its fast reload.

Jump back to quoted post28 Jan 2017, 00:15 AMLoopDloop

Ha. That's funny. Pershing better than kt? Haha... I mean sure it's faster and it's got a good all purpose gun but kt rarely misses infantry and can pretty reliably wipe 1-2 man squads even or retreat as long as it's stationary, and can even fight at guns head on. It's also got really good armor that can deflect at rounds from anything shorter than tank destroyers sometimes. Being circled shouldn't be a problem as you should definitely be covering your kt with volks or raketens, or both, as once allied paper tanks lose their mobility, they're done. The kt also has really good range so they should never get close enough to circle anyway. Everything I just said is indisputable, except for maybe the first point (I don't use it enough to be sure).