Login

russian armor

Pak 43

11 Jul 2016, 14:13 PM
#41
avatar of Vuther
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post11 Jul 2016, 03:45 AMJaedrik


"Pak shooting through building stay ugly and unrealistic"
Implying PaK's mechanic should change because it's unrealistic.
"'Or how ptrs slow and blind a tank ?' game mechanic, irrelevant"
Implying unrealistic thing shouldn't change because it's a game mechanic.

The principle that any one thing should be chanced for the sake of realism cannot be kept unless one is willing to go all the way and be 100% consistent about it in all areas.

Unless I'm reading his first post wrong. Hmm.

My apologies, I meant the mod.
11 Jul 2016, 14:56 PM
#42
avatar of Domine

Posts: 500

Why exactly is it unrealistic that the pak can shoot through buildings and how the fuck is that related to balance
11 Jul 2016, 16:11 PM
#43
avatar of Jaedrik

Posts: 446 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post11 Jul 2016, 14:13 PMVuther

My apologies, I meant the mod.


Oh. How is it?
It's great! Ranges are realistic: rifles shoot out to 300 meters before the soldiers decide they shouldn't try, SMGs to 100, AR / carbine 200, etc. Cannons fire cross map, and have accurate penetration and explosive qualities where applicable. Small arms are a little too accurate for real life soldiers, IMO. Vehicle combat is based on crits, like real life ish. It's as close as we can get.
Er, there's balance issues that need ironing out. However, he refuses to do it through compromising realism, and I think that's a good thing. Instead, he's balancing everything around cost: all weapons (including the infantry's base stuff, the cannons and MGs on the tanks) cost munitions, and all things that take fuel IRL cost fuel. Oh, and there're bugs. Heh.
Funnily enough, he removed the ability for stuff to shoot through walls. Hah. Still can't fix small arms shooting through the floors, though, because Relic. Also they're not actual ballistics. Anyways, it leads to some silly map stuff. It has to be a good flat map or a bowl or a great urban map / clearly delineated close quarters combat.
11 Jul 2016, 17:13 PM
#44
avatar of JohnnyShaun

Posts: 144

jump backJump back to quoted post11 Jul 2016, 14:56 PMDomine
Why exactly is it unrealistic that the pak can shoot through buildings and how the fuck is that related to balance


HOW CAN YOU AIM THROUGH A BUILDING ??? WHATEVER, NO DEVIATION ? :snfPeter::snfPeter::romeoHype:
11 Jul 2016, 17:36 PM
#45
avatar of Domine

Posts: 500



HOW CAN YOU AIM THROUGH A BUILDING ??? WHATEVER, NO DEVIATION ? :snfPeter::snfPeter::romeoHype:



Idk how you can aim through a building, that's not the question or the point. Why shift the goalpost? Besides, it happened during the war, why can it not happen in the game.
11 Jul 2016, 19:19 PM
#46
avatar of Arclyte

Posts: 692

rofl, anyone who would take the 17lber over the pak43 has eaten one too many crayons

pak43 needs to not be destroyed by offmap arty, so the 600mp investment isn't deleted with 1 click of the mouse. Same with howitzers.

17lber is so bad I don't even know where to begin.
11 Jul 2016, 22:27 PM
#47
avatar of Mistah_S

Posts: 851 | Subs: 1

TIL Pak43 shoots thru buildings
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Livestreams

unknown 2

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

622 users are online: 622 guests
3 posts in the last 24h
3 posts in the last week
23 posts in the last month
Registered members: 48731
Welcome our newest member, may88forex
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM