Just gonna leave this here...
Clown Car Rushed... Yeah :/
14 Jul 2013, 09:48 AM
#1
Posts: 19
14 Jul 2013, 10:36 AM
#2
Posts: 252
what seems to be the problem?
14 Jul 2013, 10:44 AM
#3
Posts: 176
You can regularly do that if you up gun them, I don't see a problem. Any unit with low health but high damage is going to end up with that sort of efficiency.
14 Jul 2013, 11:06 AM
#4
Posts: 19
There was no problem, just thought it was funny that after a 17 minute game, I had a 221 with an efficiency as high as that.
14 Jul 2013, 11:07 AM
#5
Posts: 252
good, i thought u were complaining about 221 being op huehue :>
14 Jul 2013, 11:37 AM
#6
Posts: 2425
Permanently Banned222 is a natural M3 counter, which is warranted at its Muni cost.
M3, however, even without garrison, is capable of effectively fighting 221 AND HT with its 50cal.
M3, however, even without garrison, is capable of effectively fighting 221 AND HT with its 50cal.
14 Jul 2013, 11:43 AM
#7
Posts: 19
Haha not a chance. If I was the Soviet player then I maybe would. Yeah that's true Null, to beat a M3 effectively requires semi decent macro and I also find Smoke helps a great deal.. I seriously struggle to play Germans at the moment without Smoke.
14 Jul 2013, 12:01 PM
#8
Posts: 2425
Permanently BannedConsidering the versatility of the M3 and its strong 50cal, I think the hardcounter 222 is warranted, as long as its AI remains good in upgunned version (since timings and tiers otherwise make it combat ineffective therafter. Though it still has scouting potential, no unit sbould become combat redundant due to tiering).
Also considering this, I think M3 is in a fine place atm with its 50cal and open garrison options ranging from cons to flamers to guard etc, even though it can fight a 221 in its vanilla state.
I do have some issue with HTs survival nerfs. I understand completely that these where necessary because of FHTs serious effectiveness (reference my disagreement with flame effectiveness overall).
But this has left vanilla HT in a bit of a hole. Id recommend returning vanilla HTs armor to pre-nerf standards, and making the Flamer upgrade alone carry the current reduced armor stats (as it is now a vehicle filled with a volatile fluid, afterall). I furthermore recommend removing reinforcement option from the FHT.
Once vanilla HT is returned to pre-nerf armor, removing reinforce and armor from FHT will make the vanilla HT a viable and necessary reinforce/transport.
Also considering this, I think M3 is in a fine place atm with its 50cal and open garrison options ranging from cons to flamers to guard etc, even though it can fight a 221 in its vanilla state.
I do have some issue with HTs survival nerfs. I understand completely that these where necessary because of FHTs serious effectiveness (reference my disagreement with flame effectiveness overall).
But this has left vanilla HT in a bit of a hole. Id recommend returning vanilla HTs armor to pre-nerf standards, and making the Flamer upgrade alone carry the current reduced armor stats (as it is now a vehicle filled with a volatile fluid, afterall). I furthermore recommend removing reinforcement option from the FHT.
Once vanilla HT is returned to pre-nerf armor, removing reinforce and armor from FHT will make the vanilla HT a viable and necessary reinforce/transport.
14 Jul 2013, 12:23 PM
#9
Posts: 19
I completely agree with that actually. After all the problem wasn't really Vanilla HT it was the Flame upgrade, so if the upgrade came packed with a bit of a downside to balance out the benefits, that would put Vanilla back in a good place.
PAGES (1)
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
66 | |||||
105 | |||||
11 | |||||
9 | |||||
3 | |||||
2 | |||||
1 | |||||
0 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.35057.860+15
- 3.1110614.644+11
- 4.921405.695+5
- 5.634229.735+8
- 6.276108.719+27
- 7.306114.729+2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.1045675.608+3
- 10.722440.621+4
Replay highlight
VS
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1237
Board Info
696 users are online:
696 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
35 posts in the last month
7 posts in the last week
35 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49187
Welcome our newest member, manclubgayote
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, manclubgayote
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM