[4v4] what went wrong in this
Posts: 49
Once in a while there are those Axis teams who rape us in 15min and I really dont know how they
do this Maybe they have a better micromanagement and communicating with TS.
In it I am Vladislav...
Posts: 935
Posts: 49
Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36
Posts: 49
Normally the players in my team are pretty good but this was one of the "I cant believe what I see" battles
Do you or anyone else here has an advice for this one ?
Edit: ok ok 4vs4 Axis Rank 1... now I know why we lost
Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36
But you played vs players, who plas very often 4vs4.
Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36
A totally desaster battle with my friends who normally are good players...
Once in a while there are those Axis teams who rape us in 15min and I really dont know how they
do this Maybe they have a better micromanagement and communicating with TS.
In it I am Vladislav...
A) Acutally you were lucky to play this map from north
B) But very unlucky 2 soviet together and 2 brits together vs mix axis team
C) You went for your fuel, thats ok, but then you camped there too long. This wire over the whoel fuel is not well. It cost you too much time, mirco and acutally you can't go forward to the middle vp^^
D) Your mate is t1 soviet and played vs 2 axis--> no chance
E) Your mate went T1 but without building a m3 and then he built t2 as well? Not a good idea. when you ( you should help him) have allready t2 up
F) Enemie attack the middle, throw a flamenade and you did nto react at all with your mg in the house
G) min 6: 20 you have 7 kills, 20 deaths and lost allready whole mg to the enemies
H) Your doc makes no sense! You use 0 cons. And tbh this doc is more for 1vs1.
I) You built a T70 and waste it after 30 sec
J) No mortar, no paks? Min 10 you recognize that and built 10 paks
K) End of the game you had 28/96. And thats vs vehicles and inf. So no mortar or stuka. Means your mirco was this game not that well
That were some reason, why you guys lost this game so hard. (Only watched you at all)
All in all: Enemies had better mirco and better teamplay
Hope its not too direct for you. But I prefer to say it direct, so people understand it and can learn.
Next time better: Go together with your mate to the right vps with your mgs. Pio can cap fuel, mid vp.
3 Maxims, 1 Mortar, 1 Pak should deal better and he cons with M3. After that go T70 and don't lose it soo fast . Shock/is2, gardes/ 120mm/ t34/85 and Garde/ ISU are perfect docs for 3vs3, 4vs4 .
Posts: 49
Posts: 49
Wait no? They are not rank 1 axis wtf^^.
aaaaaaaaaaah now I get it ! I thought you mean you are ON THE ENEMY TEAM in this battle and you are
Rank 1
I'm on it.
Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36
well I agree with you... but for us it was total chaos After winning so many battles we did not expect to get raped so fast and they flanked a lot with their blobs so we "paniced" a bit if u know what I mean
Well thats the problem in 3vs3, 4vs4. There are many "noobs"- low lv player playing. But you can have also a very well played game in 4vs4 from both side, like a 1vs1. But it is more rare then in 1vs1, 2vs2; I agree.
Posts: 49
use TS and sometimes there is a lack of comunication
Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36
Normally we are a really good team but of course not the best of the best and we also do not
use TS and sometimes there is a lack of comunication
Maybe we see us on the battlefield
Posts: 49
Livestreams
43 | |||||
38 | |||||
34 | |||||
8 | |||||
7 | |||||
21 | |||||
3 | |||||
2 | |||||
2 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1101614.642+2
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.271108.715+22
- 8.721440.621+3
- 9.1041674.607-2
- 10.17146.788+1
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, kavyashide
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM