Not Enough Players IMO.
This game needs to cater for 6v6 and up
what do you think of 2v2 at the moment?
23 Mar 2016, 05:14 AM
#21
Posts: 851 | Subs: 1
23 Mar 2016, 08:04 AM
#22
2 
Posts: 1108
wow is it relly that bad now? I only play 2vs2, but unfortunately I havent played for like three weeks. And three weeks ago ist was ok ^^
 | Playercard of MoerserKarL | |||||||||||||||||||
|
23 Mar 2016, 08:24 AM
#23
Posts: 393
Cancer regiment combined with maps like moscow and crossing = ruined fun.
Other than that, it's pretty good. OKW seems a little strong on certain maps.
Other than that, it's pretty good. OKW seems a little strong on certain maps.
sig by tricky 
23 Mar 2016, 13:27 PM
#24
Posts: 1701
double Wehr on Ettelbruck
2X Wehr on CQC map as Ettelbruck is a problem for you to play against? Lmfao
Blaue Division - The best corp
BPX - Black Phoenix, Clan leader.
BPX - Black Phoenix, Clan leader.
23 Mar 2016, 13:57 PM
#25
Posts: 609
2X Wehr on CQC map as Ettelbruck is a problem for you to play against? Lmfao
MG spam from the north side is obnoxious as fuck when your mate is allergic to mortars.
23 Mar 2016, 14:03 PM
#26
Posts: 25
broken. the british has killed games beyond 1v1.
23 Mar 2016, 17:17 PM
#27
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
MG spam from the north side is obnoxious as fuck when your mate is allergic to mortars.
That's a problem with your mate, not the game
As people had said before: there are certain factions/strats/units on certain maps that are problematic, but in general it's fine.
An example of cancer: Ettelbruck station early on against maxim spam with cancer Regiment with mortar emplacements. AND you are playing as 2x OKW.
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
23 Mar 2016, 17:31 PM
#28
Posts: 1554 | Subs: 7
It would be fun if you deleted the possibility of double OKW and Advanced Emplacement Regiment.
"Nullum magnum ingenium sine mixtura dementiae fuit." - Lucius Annaeus Seneca
23 Mar 2016, 17:37 PM
#29
Posts: 40
retarded "rush key building to win" meta is real.
23 Mar 2016, 17:52 PM
#30
Posts: 1072
Cancer regiment is the only real problem. Double OKW can be dealt with on the right maps if you are brits. Double snipers vs double OKW is hilariously fun. Mine off the flank buildings and then laugh even harder as they Kamikaze their falls and Jaegers to try and kill your snipers.
Sometimes I long for the days when it was only the Eastern Front armies. I gave up on Ostheer when brits came out. Brits are just OP version of Ostheer imo. Both very defensive factions with brits just having better versions of almost everything except maybe sniper. Again just my opinion. Strongest 2v2 factions right now are OKW and Brits. Fairly easy to play and a lot more forgiving.
Sometimes I long for the days when it was only the Eastern Front armies. I gave up on Ostheer when brits came out. Brits are just OP version of Ostheer imo. Both very defensive factions with brits just having better versions of almost everything except maybe sniper. Again just my opinion. Strongest 2v2 factions right now are OKW and Brits. Fairly easy to play and a lot more forgiving.
24 Mar 2016, 03:38 AM
#31
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
As people had said before: there are certain factions/strats/units on certain maps that are problematic, but in general it's fine.
I think that's the biggest issue, the map pool. Most of the 2v2 maps are utter garbage. With the vetoes we get I find myself debating on which maps to take off and then I pray I don't get a couple of the ones I have to leave in the rotation. So many of them encourage blobbing and don't offer enough flanking routes for the presence of 2 players a side. It's just too easy to lockdown areas of the map from flanks and then blob up on the rest.
24 Mar 2016, 06:30 AM
#32
Posts: 150
Many of the maps have devolved into who can make the most arty quicker E.G. Minsk Pocket, Road to Kharkov
Also the entire game revolves around if axis manages to destroy early brit emplacements while brits try their hardest to defend it.
Probably the most boring patch for 2v2 so far.
Also the entire game revolves around if axis manages to destroy early brit emplacements while brits try their hardest to defend it.
Probably the most boring patch for 2v2 so far.
24 Mar 2016, 07:11 AM
#33
Posts: 1122
Too much outstandingly bad maps and not enought bans, fight borken with broken, okw vs brits matchup feels fucked up, but maybe thats just me.
24 Mar 2016, 08:50 AM
#34
Posts: 471 | Subs: 1
Double Brits beats everything and double OKW beats any allied combo that doesn't have Brits in 
u gotta respect my opinion cus im pro ty ggwp dead game 2016
u gotta respect my opinion cus im pro ty ggwp dead game 2016 | Playercard of Siddolio | |||||||||||||||||||
|
24 Mar 2016, 15:08 PM
#35
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
you wont ever be happy with the state of 2v2. im hearing blobs and cheese since release.
servant to the vet 5 königskübel
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
24 Mar 2016, 15:39 PM
#36
Posts: 1554 | Subs: 7
Too much outstandingly bad maps and not enought bans [...]
Certainly agreed.
There are a couple of maps which have to be removed from the list without question (Ettelbrück and Rzhev for example are 3vs3 maps actually...) and maps which need a MASSIVE redesign (Moscow was tweaked a bit but still feels heavily favoured for South; Semoiskiy Winter is another example where South plays out better).
"Nullum magnum ingenium sine mixtura dementiae fuit." - Lucius Annaeus Seneca
24 Mar 2016, 16:06 PM
#37
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
Many of the maps have devolved into who can make the most arty quicker E.G. Minsk Pocket, Road to Kharkov
Minsk is pretty bad in 1v1
In 2v2 it supplants waste processing plants
24 Mar 2016, 16:16 PM
#38
19 
Posts: 1295 | Subs: 1
The map pool needs improving big time. Any map that was designed for 1v1 should NOT be in 2v2 ladder, period.
24 Mar 2016, 16:29 PM
#39
Posts: 1554 | Subs: 7
The map pool needs improving big time. Any map that was designed for 1v1 should NOT be in 2v2 ladder, period.
+1
"Nullum magnum ingenium sine mixtura dementiae fuit." - Lucius Annaeus Seneca
24 Mar 2016, 16:36 PM
#40
19 Posts: 1295 | Subs: 1
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
75 | ||
|
|
|
|
20 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
163 | ||
 |
|
|
30 | ||
|
|
|
|
20 | ||
 |
|
|
10 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.940410.696+6
- 4.35459.857-1
- 5.599234.719+7
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
11
Download
1265