Why can't there be cross factional commanders? Ex. in thread
Posts: 25
OKW Anti-Infantry Support Commander - for Ostheer
0 CP - Sturmpioneer
2 CP - Medic Truck (can't build units, only reinforce and set up retreat point)
4 CP - Artillery Flares
6 CP - Luchs
14 CP - Sturmtiger
This type of commander shouldn't break any sort of balance because they're already in game except Ostheer is allowed to use these units/abilities within a doctrine. Here is another example:
UKF Urban Defense Commander - for USF
0 CP - Universal Carrier
0 CP - Flame-thrower upgrade for Rear Echelons
8 CP - Anti-Building Flame Mortar Support
8 CP - Centaur
14 CP - Crocodile
These commanders should add a new feel in each army and they definitely shouldn't be gamebreaking. Feel free to think of new ones - I have a lot of ideas.
Posts: 609
Posts: 25
Mobile Defense and Lend Lease say hey
Mobile defense only has the Puma and it doesn't really factor in as much as for example, a medic truck or artillery flares. It also has a majority Ostheer feel to it because of the Osttruppen and the Panzer IV. Lend-Lease gives you a different type of Sherman. How about another Lend Lease commander that allows you to call in a USF Sherman or a Stuart?
Posts: 609
Its an interesting idea for sure and it makes a lot of sense thematically since Axis are the same nation and the allies had a ton of lend-lease going on. From a gameplay point of view though, I feel it would take a lot of uniqueness from the factions and the US in particular didn't use much from their Allies.
Posts: 1094 | Subs: 20
If I want to play with these units I pay the specific faction. Recycling units from other factions like the Ostwind and the Pak43 for OKW is kinda lazy in the first place if you ask me.
Posts: 25
So you want 3€ commanders which basically feature a couple of units from the other factions?It's lazy, yes, but it's interesting. It would be fun to use G43 equipped Volksgrenadiers for example. Takes care of sniper spammers against OKW or Soviets having acess to BARs for conscript squads.
If I want to play with these units I pay the specific faction. Recycling units from other factions like the Ostwind and the Pak43 for OKW is kinda lazy in the first place if you ask me.
Money doesn't really matter to me as CoH is the only game I really play.
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
everybody knows that a well rounded commander has at least 5 call-ins
2. make a mod and enjoy your features
Posts: 24
Posts: 552
It takes away a part of a factions uniqueness,
who cares about excessive faction uniqueness, that is what has plagued the balance for so long, huge divides between factions, making it difficult to find counters for units and mechanics,and resulting in what we have today, a somewhat balanced game now after the okw revamp.
And no, it does not even do that. Exception being fortifications possibly, depending on the person.
Posts: 2742
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Posts: 88
BannedSo you want 3€ commanders which basically feature a couple of units from the other factions?
If I want to play with these units I pay the specific faction. Recycling units from other factions like the Ostwind and the Pak43 for OKW is kinda lazy in the first place if you ask me.
It's not cause you wouldn't pay for it, that other people don't want to pay for it. But I agree that a complete recycle would be kinda weird. Maybe a new commander with new abilities but with some units from other factions would be better. I actually think it's a cool idea to have certain commanders of other factions (Axis staying axis and allies staying allies of course).
To all the haters in this topic - it's not always about usability. For some of us, it's also about 'just fun to play' or to switch between commanders. A lot of players are comp stompers or offline players, so I think the more options you have available, the better for everyone. Specially if the commanders don't have such an impact so the balance remains unadjusted.
Posts: 1740
You could then also add a "Beutewaffen-Commander" (Captured weapons commander) which includes allied vehicles for the German armies.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I neither find the idea very good not very bad, but I'm sure it could mess up the balancing.
You could then also add a "Beutewaffen-Commander" (Captured weapons commander) which includes allied vehicles for the German armies.
Give germans these T34s, let the fanboys know the pain
In return soviet cons could get LMG42 or shrecks, so its hard to manage muni and feel muni starved as much as ost or OKW
Livestreams
138 | |||||
60 | |||||
5 | |||||
31 | |||||
7 | |||||
3 | |||||
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.35057.860+15
- 3.1110614.644+11
- 4.921405.695+5
- 5.634229.735+8
- 6.276108.719+27
- 7.306114.729+2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.1045675.608+3
- 10.722440.621+4
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, donaldfufu
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM