(Long numbers are the damage done by the mortar to my stuka, so just ignore it)
Direct hit:
Aftermath (mind the -75):
And again:
Posts: 747 | Subs: 2
Posts: 2742
Posts: 1702
Posts: 88
BannedPosts: 747 | Subs: 2
Walking stuka is not supposed to be a counter to emplacements. So it's surprising that it sucks againts emplacements.
Posts: 1702
Actually, it is supposed to be a counter. They gave the stuka 50% bonus damage against emplacements. That means 300 dmg with a direct hit.
Posts: 392
Posts: 747 | Subs: 2
No. It's supposed to be a soft counter/not a counter at all. This was the design of emplacements and continues to be so to do this day. It has been confirmed by relic quite a few times now.
Posts: 1220
Posts: 1144 | Subs: 7
Explain why they added bonus damage for the stuka.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
69 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
37 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
29 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
285 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
13 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 |