Login

russian armor

Unreliable Walking Stuka damage against mortar emplacements

18 Feb 2016, 14:06 PM
#1
avatar of RedT3rror

Posts: 747 | Subs: 2

Walking Stuka damage is not always as effective as you might expect. About half of all barrages do just 50-80 dmg against the emplacements despite a direct hit:
(Long numbers are the damage done by the mortar to my stuka, so just ignore it)

Direct hit:



Aftermath (mind the -75):



And again:



18 Feb 2016, 16:45 PM
#2
avatar of ZombiFrancis

Posts: 2742

Walking Stuka is like, the worst unit for fighting emplacements, incidentally.

Heavy artillery is terrible against emplacements. You need the light artillery barrages from the LeiG and only the LeiG.
18 Feb 2016, 16:48 PM
#3
avatar of Burts

Posts: 1702

Walking stuka is not supposed to be a counter to emplacements. So it's surprising that it sucks againts emplacements.
18 Feb 2016, 16:50 PM
#4
avatar of TEKOA

Posts: 88

Banned
The LeIG is your friend.
18 Feb 2016, 17:05 PM
#5
avatar of RedT3rror

Posts: 747 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Feb 2016, 16:48 PMBurts
Walking stuka is not supposed to be a counter to emplacements. So it's surprising that it sucks againts emplacements.


Actually, it is supposed to be a counter. They gave the stuka 50% bonus damage against emplacements. That means 300 dmg with a direct hit.
18 Feb 2016, 17:09 PM
#6
avatar of Burts

Posts: 1702



Actually, it is supposed to be a counter. They gave the stuka 50% bonus damage against emplacements. That means 300 dmg with a direct hit.



No. It's supposed to be a soft counter/not a counter at all. This was the design of emplacements and continues to be so to do this day. It has been confirmed by relic quite a few times now.
18 Feb 2016, 17:10 PM
#7
avatar of Nabarxos

Posts: 392

The walking stuka can only damage the 17 pounder (take half of its health) seems the rockets unless all of them hit one emplacement won't do much damage
18 Feb 2016, 17:20 PM
#8
avatar of RedT3rror

Posts: 747 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Feb 2016, 17:09 PMBurts



No. It's supposed to be a soft counter/not a counter at all. This was the design of emplacements and continues to be so to do this day. It has been confirmed by relic quite a few times now.


Explain why they added bonus damage for the stuka.
18 Feb 2016, 17:30 PM
#9
avatar of SupremeStefan

Posts: 1220

18 Feb 2016, 19:50 PM
#10
avatar of LemonJuice

Posts: 1144 | Subs: 7



Explain why they added bonus damage for the stuka.


because without the added bonus damage it did almost nothing to them. the walking stuka does poorly against the mortar pit because most of the time the rockets dont get a direct hit on the emplacement. if you fire against the bofors or 17pdr which have bigger hitboxes youll notice it does a lot better.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Livestreams

United States 27
unknown 6
Russian Federation 5

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

865 users are online: 865 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
10 posts in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Registered members: 50010
Welcome our newest member, yresearcher
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM