Relying and crutches just to win against mediocre players, I'm wondering if Relic has lost sight of it's intentions for Ostheer and the game in general, which ultimately should be to create a fun game(and make money). Regardless of balance, player enjoyment and contentment usually indicates your doing something right, and with the advent of the last patch, and all this new premium P2W commanders, this game has completely lost a sense of direction.
I realized this after getting pissed after the (insert RNG incidence here), for the (insert large number here) time. So, my intentions here are simple, find out what the player base is seeking to obtain from playing this gem of a game, and see where they want it to go.
A directional poll
10 Feb 2016, 06:06 AM
#1
Posts: 552
ahwoah kenny
10 Feb 2016, 06:48 AM
#2
8 
Posts: 2470
well i used to play because i liked the game. now i play occasionally because i have one friend who still (masochistically, he complains a lot) likes the game. i voted for friends on that although it's more of a duty than an enjoyment, even on victories.
as for the balance, i don't give a fuck about the brits AEC becausei he plays exclusively 4v4s, whether we have 4 people or not, and the AEC isn't a significant issue in 4v4s. would have voted balance if you didn't specifically point to the brits so i voted RNG instead.
as for the balance, i don't give a fuck about the brits AEC because
10 Feb 2016, 06:59 AM
#3
Posts: 552
well i used to play because i liked the game. now i play occasionally because i have one friend who still (masochistically, he complains a lot) likes the game. i voted for friends on that although it's more of a duty than an enjoyment, even on victories.
as for the balance, i don't give a fuck about the brits AEC becauseihe plays exclusively 4v4s, whether we have 4 people or not, and the AEC isn't a significant issue in 4v4s. would have voted balance if you didn't specifically point to the brits so i voted RNG instead.
General balance patch? Those haven't got the game anywhere bro.
ahwoah kenny
10 Feb 2016, 07:08 AM
#4
8 Posts: 2470
General balance patch? Those haven't got the game anywhere bro.
they have, they've gotten the game all over the place. again though, i don't consider the AEC a significant issue so i'm not going to vote for it.
10 Feb 2016, 07:46 AM
#5
Posts: 1281 | Subs: 3
Interesting poll. Thanks Edible.
10 Feb 2016, 08:32 AM
#6
Posts: 378
Relying and crutches just to win against mediocre players, I'm wondering if Relic has lost sight of it's intentions for Ostheer and the game in general, which ultimately should be to create a fun game(and make money). Regardless of balance, player enjoyment and contentment usually indicates your doing something right, and with the advent of the last patch, and all this new premium P2W commanders, this game has completely lost a sense of direction.
I realized this after getting pissed after the (insert RNG incidence here), for the (insert large number here) time. So, my intentions here are simple, find out what the player base is seeking to obtain from playing this gem of a game, and see where they want it to go.
Good poll, although you miss several options such as redesigning faction or adding new content(Panzer III or Hotchkiss in a commander for example).
However, you will not get the real input, because coh2.org is just a fanpage. Many players (majority of my friends) do not even know its existance or check it regularly.
10 Feb 2016, 10:40 AM
#7
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
isnt multi-choice possible? i want pathin, warspoil and reliance of commanders fixed 
10 Feb 2016, 10:45 AM
#8
Posts: 107
× all of the above
10 Feb 2016, 11:06 AM
#9
Posts: 640
There should be more viable build orders and strategies. The balance is pretty bad if only one strategy works efficiently (for example maxim spam vs OKW, or AEC spam vs whatever). Or as ostheer against USF/UKF double sniper strats.
10 Feb 2016, 16:09 PM
#10
Posts: 552
isnt multi-choice possible? i want pathin, warspoil and reliance of commanders fixed
I'm more or less targeting questions towards the most pressing issues people have with the game, but would certainly make it multi choice if I had that option.
ahwoah kenny
10 Feb 2016, 16:11 PM
#11
Posts: 552
Good poll, although you miss several options such as redesigning faction or adding new content(Panzer III or Hotchkiss in a commander for example).
However, you will not get the real input, because coh2.org is just a fanpage. Many players (majority of my friends) do not even know its existance or check it regularly.
You're completely right, I should've included options for more content, my bad.
ahwoah kenny
10 Feb 2016, 16:17 PM
#12
10 
Posts: 4785 | Subs: 3
Edited the Poll and added New Content and All of the above option
10 Feb 2016, 16:18 PM
#13
Posts: 446 | Subs: 2
We need multiple selection polls.
Dear Lord, teach me to be generous; to give and not count the cost; to fight and not heed the wounds; to work and ask for no reward, save that of knowing I am doing Your will.
Argumentation, disagreement, and debate are critical for success.
The most important type of diversity is viewpoint diversity.
Argumentation, disagreement, and debate are critical for success.
The most important type of diversity is viewpoint diversity.
10 Feb 2016, 16:19 PM
#14
10 Posts: 4785 | Subs: 3
We need multiple selection polls.
We should have something like that, but I am not sure why it does not work :/
10 Feb 2016, 17:48 PM
#15
Posts: 2742
Infantry have always felt clunky and unresponsive in their movements and actions since day 1.
When I watch and/or play a CoH1 match I feel the considerable difference in infantry behavior and wonder why it's such a problem for CoH2.
I will watch my infantry jog down the road with their rifle in one hand in the middle of combat in CoH2. Whereas in CoH1 I see riflemen backpedaling and sidestepping to shoot at enemy infantry all the time. They turn and move when they're told and they move faster than molasses even when they're not retreating.
When I watch and/or play a CoH1 match I feel the considerable difference in infantry behavior and wonder why it's such a problem for CoH2.
I will watch my infantry jog down the road with their rifle in one hand in the middle of combat in CoH2. Whereas in CoH1 I see riflemen backpedaling and sidestepping to shoot at enemy infantry all the time. They turn and move when they're told and they move faster than molasses even when they're not retreating.
Strategic Territory Points Mod:
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=604491510
Classic resource points!
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=604491510
Classic resource points!
10 Feb 2016, 21:22 PM
#16
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
I'll go with:
-Reduce reliance on commanders
-General balance patch for Brits to fix Aec and bring Early game in line with other factions. I'll say this should apply to all factions.
-Fix Warspoils
-Fix pathing. Or more like revert the changes
I'll add:
-Veterancy revamp on EFA
-Rework of forgotten units
-Reduce reliance on commanders
-General balance patch for Brits to fix Aec and bring Early game in line with other factions. I'll say this should apply to all factions.
-Fix Warspoils
-Fix pathing. Or more like revert the changes
I'll add:
-Veterancy revamp on EFA
-Rework of forgotten units
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
10 Feb 2016, 23:38 PM
#17
Posts: 552
Edited the Poll and added New Content and All of the above option
I appreciate it.
ahwoah kenny
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
39 | ||
|
|
|
|
15 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
44 | ||
 |
|
|
19 | ||
|
|
|
|
9 | ||
 |
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.653231.739+13
- 2.840223.790+3
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.599234.719+7
- 5.278108.720+29
- 6.927408.694+1
- 7.645.928+5
- 8.306114.729+2
- 9.1123623.643+4
- 10.266140.655+1
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
11
Download
1257
Board Info
348 users are online:
1 member and 347 guests
aerafield
aerafield
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
17 posts in the last month
5 posts in the last week
17 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49668
Welcome our newest member, Mckifcdvllip
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Mckifcdvllip
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM