![](http://i67.tinypic.com/1zdps0m.png)
If you use tac map its even more obvious.
Posts: 393
Posts: 422 | Subs: 3
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
It has always been there, but i think it should not do that.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Wait, really?
Man, were players who placed mines that uncommon?...helped by the Radio Intercept commanders being infrequently used.
Posts: 245
Actually, they have whined about it to the point there no one was using radio intercept doctrines any longer. Plus, it was patched not to show mine placement.
Posts: 422 | Subs: 3
Wait, really?
Man, were players who placed mines that uncommon?...helped by the Radio Intercept commanders being infrequently used.
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
The problem why those commanders arent used is not in radio intercept
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Actually, they have whined about it to the point there no one was using radio intercept doctrines any longer. Plus, it was patched not to show mine placement.
Posts: 393
Posts: 367
So if I understand this right, it once showed mine location - relic patched it so it wont show mine location - and now its broken again and shows mine location?
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
So if I understand this right, it once showed mine location - relic patched it so it wont show mine location - and now its broken again and shows mine location?
Posts: 1384
Posts: 587
Posts: 46
Is it intented that the Soviet radio abbility shows the exact placement of enemy mines, as shown in the screen show below?
If you use tac map its even more obvious.
Actually, they have whined about it to the point there no one was using radio intercept doctrines any longer. Plus, it was patched not to show mine placement.
Posts: 393
snip
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
15 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
15 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
9 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 |