320 damage is too much

Jump back to quoted post24 Jan 2016, 12:29 PMMyself

Do you let you car break down on you or do you take for service before it breaks?

Jump back to quoted post24 Jan 2016, 12:43 PMPablonano

But the "meta" is something unexistand because is just a gloval opinion, balancing things to limit the gane only to be " metagame favoured" its stupid. If somebody manages to make things work out of meta doesnt meant it has to be smashed

Jump back to quoted post24 Jan 2016, 20:01 PMWhySooSerious

95 range lol. Someone didnt play the 100 range meta. i remember how fucking OP 100 range was. And if you're gonna say next "forget the range changes" you've just made these units 100% useless because they cannot move and dont shoot fast so I'd rather have a normal AT Gun than spend an extra load of manpower for something that has pretty much the same performance of a normal AT Gun because I can actually move it.

Jump back to quoted post24 Jan 2016, 20:01 PMWhySooSerious

Also adding on top that all 4 of these units are rather easy to kill. Unless you're gonna say next increase their durability then we have Sim City from CoH1 back in CoH2.

Jump back to quoted post24 Jan 2016, 20:01 PMWhySooSerious

So do we want to change something that doesnt need fixing? no, in fact this is one of the few things Relic has managed to balanced VERY well.

Jump back to quoted post24 Jan 2016, 20:41 PMLokust22

Again... I did play when things had 100 range. The main problem then was elefants and ISUs (and later jagd with 115 range). I don't think it would be a massive issue if the pak had close to 100 range again, especially if it wasn't 2 shotting things.


I wouldn't call the elefant and jagd "easy" to kill by any stretch of the imagination. Pak is pretty easy to kill though.

Jump back to quoted post24 Jan 2016, 21:53 PMWhySooSerious

Well we all have our own opinions based on experience. Maybe you could make a mod and post it on coh2.org so people can check it out.