Quick doctrine fixes (Soviets)
Posts: 132
Guards Motor Coordination Tactics
Fine as is.
Guard Rifle Combined Arms Tactics
Hit the Dirt reduced from 2 CPs to 1 CP.
This is not a strong ability. Why does it come in at 2 CPs? it just makes your conscripts immobile in return for light cover and suppression immunity.
Conscript PPSH package reduced from 3 to 1 CPs.
First of all, you don't have the munitions to upgrade your army with PPSHs at this point anyway, especially not if you are throwing molotovs. But reducing it to 1CP means that if you do manage to perform well in the early game and have some spare munitions you are rewarded for that faster.
Shock Rifle Frontline Tactics
KV-8 reduced from 9 to 7 CPs.
By the time this tank comes out you are dealing with tanks, while it's meant to combat infantry and light vehicles. Reducing the CP cost does not increase its direct combat power but it does help the idea that Soviets are supposed to take the game to the Germans before the late game, not wait for it. If it proves to be too strong then a better idea than reverting its CP cost is to decrease its initial stats but give it bigger vet rewards.
Shock Motor Heavy Tactics
Armoured Vehicle Detection reduced from 4 to 2 CPs.
Why does this ability come in after vehicles have already started to make their impact?
Conscript Repair Kit reduced from 5 to 3 CPs.
This times the ability better with your own deployment of light vehicles, without reducing it all the way down to near no CPs and so risking undesirable effects on the early & team games.
NKVD Disruption Tactics
I'll make an exception to what I said in the introduction, because this doctrine is just too much of an ugly mess - something has to go. It's closest to an air support doctrine, but it also has Rapid Conscription, and neither of those things go together with its actual commander name. The things that need to go are Rapid Conscription and Sturmovik Attacks. Put PMD-6 Mines and Booby Traps in their place, which is far more "disruptive" and also gets those abilities into more than 1 doctrine each.
Soviet Reserve Army
PPSH Package reduced to 1 CP, Repair Kit reduced to 3 CP.
Rapid Conscription ?
I've honestly never used this ability. I even played several games because I wanted to try it but ended up never activating it. What do you guys who have actually used it say? is it fine or could it use a CP reduction?
Soviet Shock Army
Either PPSH Package or Shock Troops replaced with For Mother Russia. If PPSH Package is kept, it's reduced to 1 CP.
I used to play this doctrine a lot and the more I did, the less I could see why these two abilities were in the same doctrine. Why would I want to call in horribly expensive shock troops that don't benefit from the upgrades I paid manpower and fuel for if I'm already getting PPSH conscripts? and vice versa if I get shock troops but no conscripts. In either case there's a better doctrine to pick and using both is pointless. Imo Shock Troops should be the replaced ability mostly because countless doctrines have them already, and since conscripts are supposed to be the Soviet backbone.
Soviet Combined Arms Army
Fine as is.
Terror Tactics
KV-8 reduced from 9 to 7 CPs.
Conscript Support Tactics
PPSH Package reduced to 1 CP, Repair Kit reduced to 3 CP, Rapid Conscription ?
Mechanized Support Tactics
Fine as is.
Anti-Infantry Tactics
KV-8 reduced from 9 to 7 CPs.
Armoured Assault Tactics
Fine as is.
Advanced Warfare Tactics
PPSH Package reduced to 1 CP, Repair Kit reduced to 3 CP.
Partisan Tactics
Fine as is.
Soviet Industry
I don't know about this doctrine, because I've never used it and I don't know the values on the supply drop.
Defense Tactics
This is basically a T1 doctrine or with conscripts. The problem with this is that it doesn't come in a timely fashion to help you if you go T1, by the time you can start to call in the machine guns the early infantry fights are already decided and you want to get AT support (same reason why you don't go T1 and then wait to call in shocks). This would especially be the case if penals were a functioning unit. It doesn't provide anything to conscripts, making it questionable why you would pick this doctrine instead of just teching to T2 which coincidentally also gives you an AT gun that isn't a piece of sh!t. I'd say reduce the DSHK from 2 to 1 CPs. If you want to give this doctrine a unique theme, reduce it to 0 CPs so you can "defend" crucial buildings or positions ASAP but this is not necessary.
Urban Defense Tactics
Fine as is.
Counterattack Tactics
I've never thought that the KV-1 was worth calling in at 8 CPs unless I knew I was already winning and just needed something to clean up. But I think the hate would be too strong if it got reduced to 7 CPs because then people would maybe have to use actual anti-tank tactics against it by doing revolutionary stuff like placing mines, supporting their pak or microing their puma, so I'm not going to officially suggest it even though imo it should be.
Tank Hunter Tactics
Conscript PTRS Package reduced from 3 to 2 CPs.
What exactly is the point of this upgrade if it won't fill the gap between enemy vehicle and your own AT deployment? I don't need it to come 1 CP after whatever units I'm using have already had to either die to or destroy the scout car. Guards aren't 3 CPs so why is this?
Lend Lease Tactics
Supply Drop ?, Halftrack Assault Group reduced from 5 (lmao) to 3 CPs.
If the Industry Supply Drop is changed, this ability should either also be changed or be made into a separate instance that retains its current stats. The HT Group will probably be of questionable use even at 3 CPs, but at least it won't be a never seen laughing stock like it is now. It could probably be moved to 2 CPs and the Kraut mower (if it has that upgrade, never used this ability) upgradable only when you make T3 or T4 but again the hate might be too strong for that.
Now I'll await your I'm a moron/I'm a fanboy/I'm worse than Relic/I'm trying to ruin the game etc. what do you guys think?
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3
Posts: 132
i expect soviet only from your playercard. unfortunately i cannot see it
I got bored of playing Ostheer years ago when there were still only 2 factions because it was too easy so I started focusing on Soviets, then I took a break from the game while they fixed the balance and came back only recently. Now the Soviet vs Ostheer matchup is very balanced by comparison to earlier and needs no large adjustments imo. I have given reasons why my changes are not enormous buffs, such as that at 1 CP you barely have any munitions with which to upgrade for PPSHs anyway and you'd do so at the cost of using other abilities, which means that the change adds flexibility more so than being a straight buff.
Also FYI, this thread is intended to be the first of a series, that's why I put the faction name in a parenthesis. I posted the Soviets first because their changes are the most clear to me and they arguably depend more on their doctrines. The other factions could use changes too like the Ostheer relief infantry, UKF Valentine tank and so on. I just happened to post this one first.
Posts: 783
Ppsh would be ok at 2cp, too early at 1cp. Dshk should be 1cp.
pmd mines and tank traps should be 0cp like rifle defenses.
Hit the dirt is crap and should be 0cp. Script repair would be ok at 3cp, as would vehicle detection since neither have any game winning shock value.
The m5 guards calling could maybe be 4cp but lower then that wouldbe too much- the m5 isn't comparable to the 251 call in as it can reinforce and be upgraded allowing it to scale better
I agree with what you have to say for the most part as a concept, I just think it needs fine tuning.
Posts: 132
Kv8 is fine at 9cp.
Ppsh would be ok at 2cp, too early at 1cp. Dshk should be 1cp.
pmd mines and tank traps should be 0cp like rifle defenses.
Hit the dirt is crap and should be 0cp. Script repair would be ok at 3cp, as would vehicle detection since neither have any game winning shock value.
The m5 guards calling could maybe be 4cp but lower then that wouldbe too much- the m5 isn't comparable to the 251 call in as it can reinforce and be upgraded allowing it to scale better
I agree with what you have to say for the most part as a concept, I just think it needs fine tuning.
Thanks for your reply. Yes, it's the concept which is important and the details will as ever be fine tuned in testing.
Posts: 10
Posts: 498
PPSHs should come at 2 CPs instead of 3, them coming at 1 CP would be pretty much useless because you wouldn't have ammo to upgrade them anyways and this would cause an outrage with USF 1919LMGs coming at 3 points so all the USF fanboys would be saying that "If PPSHs and G43s come at 1cp, why doesn't 1919LMGs!?!?"
Cons Repair Kit is fine as it is, no need for CP reduction or anything
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
Rapid Conscription (Blobification) as an ability is ok, using it is a small risk tho, because you might not benefit from it at all, pretty much nothing wrong with this ability and it comes at the right CP
You just gotta throw your units at the enemy in a manner that is vaguely retarded and nigh impossible for them to not beat.
The hard part is not entirely giving up map control doing it, so you gotta do what was mentioned while pressuring the enemy sufficiently they don't just take over the entire map because you tried to make 18 individual men to die.
Posts: 230
Permanently BannedConscript vet 3 would need a slight nerf though.
Posts: 118
Posts: 275 | Subs: 1
Ppsh would be ok at 2cp, too early at 1cp.
Why GW43 is OK on 1 CP and Ppsh on 1 CP is too early?
The m5 guards calling could maybe be 4cp but lower then that wouldbe too much- the m5 isn't comparable to the 251 call in as it can reinforce and be upgraded allowing it to scale better
Dev have another opinion
Posts: 609
Also, just my personal preference, but Hit the Dirt should affect Penals and Guards as well as Cons and Industry should have its original bonuses (rebalanced to compensate for changes) and be tied to a truck placed on a fuel point.
Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9
Posts: 640 | Subs: 1
KV8 at 7CPQuick Relic, make this guy a balance designer.
Posts: 166
Posts: 166
Since the doctrines with this ability are all about masses of infantry perhaps it could be a manpower from fuel/munitions?
Posts: 783
Why GW43 is OK on 1 CP and Ppsh on 1 CP is too early?
Dev have another opinion
For your first point, the g43 isn't as big an upgrade for grens as ppsh are for conscripts.
In regards to your second point it's true that tactical support gets an m5 but it does not come with elite assault troops like the Soviet one packaged into the deal. The ostheer callins are much better to compare to because ostheer tech pace is closer to soviets then usf is.
Livestreams
54 | |||||
42 | |||||
18 | |||||
11 | |||||
816 | |||||
40 | |||||
30 | |||||
29 | |||||
21 | |||||
9 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.35057.860+15
- 3.1110614.644+11
- 4.624225.735+2
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.919405.694+3
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, pawlicmarg44
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM