What do you think, which one is better?
And btw. give ability to put mortar to the Ostheer trench again, not sure why it was "fixed" by Relic it even have a hole on top. Anyone ever complained about this?
Give Brits vCoH style trenches instead of Otheer copypasta
22 Dec 2015, 11:14 AM
#1
Posts: 344
I liked the old ones more.
What do you think, which one is better?
And btw. give ability to put mortar to the Ostheer trench again, not sure why it was "fixed" by Relic it even have a hole on top. Anyone ever complained about this?
What do you think, which one is better?
And btw. give ability to put mortar to the Ostheer trench again, not sure why it was "fixed" by Relic it even have a hole on top. Anyone ever complained about this?
22 Dec 2015, 11:47 AM
#2
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
The only thing about brits trenches is that they can't be occupied by enemy troops. And that is not right.
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
22 Dec 2015, 12:52 PM
#3
Posts: 190
What do you think, which one is better?
The one that can be captured?
22 Dec 2015, 13:43 PM
#4
2 
Posts: 538
left one looks like a trench,
the right thing looks like a poorly built shit hole
the right thing looks like a poorly built shit hole
Greetings from Nürnberg - always happy to increase our local COH pool for local events - more glory: Rankade ladder
22 Dec 2015, 13:52 PM
#5
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
left one looks like a trench,
the right thing looks like a poorly built shit hole
22 Dec 2015, 14:06 PM
#6
Posts: 521
Is the model on the left already in the game? If so, why not?
22 Dec 2015, 14:38 PM
#7
Posts: 245
I always thought the one without a top looked better. Also I agree let mortars use trenchs again.
22 Dec 2015, 14:56 PM
#8
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
The only thing about brits trenches is that they can't be occupied by enemy troops. And that is not right.
It is right. Because you are paying for them 50 MP.
If they were free then yes enemy should occupy them , but right now NO
22 Dec 2015, 14:58 PM
#9
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
left one looks like a trench,
the right thing looks like a poorly built shit hole
22 Dec 2015, 15:03 PM
#10
Posts: 344
In vCoH you could build a trench and put a demo charge inside and lol hard when enemy enter to occupy it. 
22 Dec 2015, 16:33 PM
#11
Posts: 1679 | Subs: 5
Yeah, let's incorporate the single worst design element of the single worst faction in the history of the franchise. What a swell plan.
22 Dec 2015, 16:38 PM
#12
Posts: 344
Yeah, let's incorporate the single worst design element of the single worst faction in the history of the franchise. What a swell plan.
What? It's only a different model, trenches are already in the game.
22 Dec 2015, 18:13 PM
#13
Posts: 1679 | Subs: 5
Sure, but CoH2 trenches are nothing like CoH1 Brit trenches gameplay-wise. Adding CoH1 Brit trenches would be ridiculously stupid.
22 Dec 2015, 18:50 PM
#14
Posts: 109
Sure, but CoH2 trenches are nothing like CoH1 Brit trenches gameplay-wise. Adding CoH1 Brit trenches would be ridiculously stupid.
Dank hunter here, can I get some of what you're smoking on? How would it be any different at all? It's purely aesthetic. The new trench looks gay. The old one is OG.
23 Dec 2015, 01:04 AM
#15
Posts: 92
Dunno why brit emplacements have Camo netting when there's nothing camouflaged about them.
23 Dec 2015, 14:14 PM
#16
1 Posts: 1276
The only thing about brits trenches is that they can't be occupied by enemy troops. And that is not right.
If they were free to build Im sure it would be fair to let the bad guys use them
23 Dec 2015, 15:05 PM
#17
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
Sure, but CoH2 trenches are nothing like CoH1 Brit trenches gameplay-wise. Adding CoH1 Brit trenches would be ridiculously stupid.
This theters like old one this same trench will all parameters like old one this same trench will all parameters like old one except it would look more like trench rather than bad shithole
23 Dec 2015, 18:02 PM
#18
Posts: 190
It is right. Because you are paying for them 50 MP.
If they were free then yes enemy should occupy them , but right now NO
If they were free to build Im sure it would be fair to let the bad guys use them
So by this logic deserted weapons and vehicles should not be capturable? I mean i bought them with manpower its not right to enemy use them then...
OF COURSE they should be capturable to penalize stupid usage
you push them too far, -> team killed and weapon captured. Build a trench on top of the victory point then abandon it -> you cannot penalize him from that when he abandones it. There is no danger in trenches.
23 Dec 2015, 18:15 PM
#19
Posts: 211
The left model is definitley better in this case as it is more suitable for the style of the british forces.
23 Dec 2015, 18:43 PM
#20
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
So by this logic deserted weapons and vehicles should not be capturable? I mean i bought them with manpower its not right to enemy use them then...
OF COURSE they should be capturable to penalize stupid usage
you push them too far, -> team killed and weapon captured. Build a trench on top of the victory point then abandon it -> you cannot penalize him from that when he abandones it. There is no danger in trenches.
Axis trench = UKF trench in all terms (durability , squad capacity)
Birtish trench cost 50 MP because enemy cannot use it.
Axis one is free because it is neutral structure.
Also UKF trench will die to some fire too , so if you buuild it at VP enemy will kill it with pak one you abandon it.
Tank abanonement mechanic is bad , please dont take it as your argument.
Also loosing weapon and trench is something completely different.
It is like saing once USA fighting position is wihtout RE , axis should capture it (same logic here)
If you want to have that trench neutral structure , then revert 50 MP cost (thats a lot for manpower starved faction)
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
62 | ||
 |
|
|
14 | ||
|
|
|
|
9 | ||
 |
|
|
8 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
143 | ||
|
|
|
|
26 | ||
|
|
|
|
12 | ||
 |
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
5 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.600215.736+15
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1107614.643+8
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.273108.717+24
- 8.722440.621+4
- 9.1041674.607-2
- 10.17146.788+1
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1235
Board Info
936 users are online:
936 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49107
Welcome our newest member, Falac851
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Falac851
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM