THE problem of the insane strenght of OKW.

Posts: 875 | Subs: 2
Posts: 47
Posts: 708 | Subs: 1
Posts: 128
Posts: 830
M3 or M20 hardcounters it quite well. I have to admit that the small arms penetration is very RNG dependant, sometimes a con volley brings it down to 3/4 health, sometimes it doesn't. You also have to remember that there is one less infantry squad on the OKW side early on, so you should be able to win those engagements.
I like the Kubel's new role and I think it's fine.
Posts: 1094 | Subs: 20
yeah and then kubel casually rolls to your cut off while you are busy fighting his infantry.
Posts: 830
sounds like a l2p issue to me though because of the reasons I stated above
Posts: 521
Posts: 2470
Posts: 1664
Posts: 513
Posts: 552
Posts: 1891
Posts: 2470
Kubel has to be really good because the OKW are an early game faction with crappy lategame infantry and vehicles.
So: l2p. Soviets have no problem with OKW, and the only other faction (USF) has Riflemen.
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
Kubel has to be really good because the OKW are an early game faction with crappy lategame infantry and vehicles.
So: l2p. Soviets have no problem with OKW, and the only other faction (USF) has Riflemen.
Posts: 1653
Kubel has to be really good because the OKW are an early game faction with crappy lategame infantry and vehicles.
So: l2p. Soviets have no problem with OKW, and the only other faction (USF) has Riflemen.
Posts: 132
Posts: 1097
Posts: 1664
Kubel has to be really good because the OKW are an early game faction with crappy lategame infantry and vehicles.
So: l2p. Soviets have no problem with OKW, and the only other faction (USF) has Riflemen.
Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
143 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
49 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
16 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
89 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
26 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
18 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
16 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
15 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
2 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 |